Skip to main content

NLSY79 Child and Young Adult

Pooling Sample Sizes

The panel dimension of the NLSY79 data collection permits one to cumulate sample cases for children at specified ages across survey points, thus attaining rather substantial sample sizes for those ages. Pooling in this manner also can greatly enhance the heterogeneity of the sample for specific research topics. The trade-off to this methodology is that the ability to follow a particular age cohort across survey years becomes somewhat limited, although it is still doable for selected research topics. Table 1 below highlights potential sample sizes using this approach.

Pooling the Child samples. From the perspective of the younger children, it is possible to attain single year of age samples numbering in the thousands for specific research efforts. For example, if one wishes to examine associations between scores on the digit span assessment and other factors for seven year olds, it would be possible to cumulate a sample of about 4,000 seven-year-old children from the first to the current assessment survey year (see Table 1 below). Because these children would have been born to mothers in all years between 1979 and the current survey round (see Table 2 in the Sample Design section), the mothers of these children would range in age from their teens to their forties. The relevance of this pooling approach for evaluation of the child data, utilizing various assessments, is dealt with in the "Repeat Assessments" section of the Child Assessments--Introduction.

Pooling the Young Adults. Parallel estimates can be found for young adults. Because the young adult interviews have only been ongoing since the 1994 survey round, no single year-of-age cumulative estimate can include more than eleven points. Nonetheless, returning to Table 1 below, the number of cases cumulated in this way for ages 15 to 18 all attain single year of age totals of between 3,417 and 3,560 cases. It is worth noting that this sample cumulation modestly increases the heterogeneity of these young adult samples. For example, cumulating cases at these early young adult ages expands the age of the mothers at children's birth from mid-adolescence to the late forties. Because beginning in 2010 young adults age 31-32, 35-36, 39-40, 43-44, etc., as of December 31 of the survey year are not fielded, pooled sample sizes in these age ranges will be constrained.

Table 1. NLSY79 Child and Young Adult Sample Types for Pooled Age Groups through the Current Survey Round
Younger Children      
Pooled Age Groups 1986-2020 Survey Round
 
Total Possible # Males Females
0 year olds 2704  1413 1291
1 year olds 3102 1586 1516
2 year olds 3281 1655 1626
3 year olds 3537 1799 1738
4 year olds 3698 1879 1819
5 year olds 3875 1989 1886
6 year olds 3911 2000 1911
7 year olds 4042 2058 1984
8 year olds 4085 2058 2027
9 year olds 4068 2060 2008
10 year olds 4146 2097 2049
11 year olds 4062 2062 2000
12 year olds1 4044 2062 1982
13 year olds2 4008 2046 1962
14 year olds3 2267 1146 1121
       
Young Adult Children      
Pooled Age Groups 1994-2020 Survey Round
 
Total Possible # Males Females
14 Year Olds 1929 989 940
15 Year Olds 3460 1774 1686
16 Year Olds 3594 1857 1737
17 Year Olds 3477 1749 1728
18 Year Olds 3681 1848 1833
19 Year Olds 3460 1703 1757
20 Year Olds 3589 1793 1796
21 Year Olds 3441 1675 1766
22 Year Olds 3330 1646 1684
23 Year Olds 3298 1611 1687
24 Year Olds 3277 1587 1690
25 Year Olds 3160 1573 1587
26 Year Olds 3088 1470 1618
27 Year Olds 2989 1503 1486
28 Year Olds 2831 1369 1462
29 Year Olds 2690 1319 1371
30 Year Olds 2153 1012 1141
31 Year Olds 492 236 256
32 Year Olds 463 192 271
33 Year Olds 1728 833 895
34 Year Olds 1651 780 871
35 Year Olds 291 140 151
36 Year Olds 121 51 70
37 Year Olds 1081 493 588
38 Year Olds 1010 489 521
39 Year Olds 162 81 81
40 Year Olds 41 13 28
41 Year Olds 428 204 224
42 Year Olds 351 157 194
43 Year Olds 55  27 28
44 Year Olds 6  2 4
45 Year Olds 92  46 46
46 Year Olds 51  25  26
47+ Years Old 5 1 4

NOTE: Ages are computed as of survey dates. For the Younger Children portion of this table, the counts are cumulative from 1986 to the current interview and are based on a child being interviewed in at least one survey year. In 2016, the Mother Supplement remained in the NLSY79 questionnaire, but the Child Supplement was not administered. In 2018, there was no Mother Supplement, but 12 and 13 year olds were interviewed as part of the YA survey. Starting in 1994, children who turned 15 or older as of December 31st of the reference year of the survey round were fielded as Young Adults. Some were age 14 when interviewed. Beginning in 2016, the inclusions age for the Young Adult fielding was lowered to 12. Those turning 14 went through the traditional YA survey, but those turning 12 or 13 answered far fewer questions, primarily drawn from the Child Supplement. The Young Adult Children portion of this table includes only those children aged 14 or older who have completed at least one Young Adult survey from 1994 to the current interview. Users should note that beginning in 2010 young adults age 31-32, 35-36, 39-40, 43-44, etc, as of December 31 of the survey year are not fielded; thus, pooled sample sizes in these age ranges will be constrained.

1 Of the 21 12 year olds in R27, 20 have both Mother Supplement and YA interview data.

2 Of the 28 13 year olds in R27, 26 have both Mother Supplement and YA interview data.

3 Beginning in 2012, the NLSY79 field period routinely crossed into the year after the reference year for fielding in the Child versus Young Adult samples. Subsequently, some of the 14 year olds had turned 15 by the point of their actual interview.

 

Intercohort and Cross Generational Research

These sections outline some research topics for which the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult data are particularly appropriate. Specific topics are not explored in depth but instead are presented as examples of a range of subjects that can be investigated. The focus here is on ways in which data from the main NLSY79 mothers, the younger children, and the young adults can be linked, allowing researchers to carry out not only within but also cross-generational research. Specific procedures for accessing and linking the various data files are discussed in Linking Children, Young Adults, and Mothers.

Note: Throughout these sections, the "current survey round" refers to the most recent public data release.

The NLSY79 main respondents were first interviewed in 1979.  An in-depth discussion of the information available for these main respondents is presented in the most recent NLSY79 User's Guide. As of the current survey round, the NLSY79 Child/Young Adult sample encompasses nearly all of the children that will ever be born to this cohort of women -- women who were 55-64 years old as of their 2020 interview date -- and they range in age from infancy into their late-forties. Large samples of these children are available for analysis throughout childhood and adolescence. Further, because growing numbers of children enter the young adult ages with each survey round, researchers are able to undertake analyses relating to transitions into adulthood for increasingly representative samples of youth. In addition, large minority samples are available, and as described in the sections of this guide on the sample, a variety of sibling-oriented analyses are possible. By pooling groups of children at certain ages across a number of years, researchers can also enhance sample sizes for relatively narrow age ranges, while at the same time improving the heterogeneity of the sample.

Further, a revised custom weight program is now available that permits users to more effectively combine weighted samples across survey years. Users do need to keep in mind that the oldest children were born to young NLSY79 mothers (and that the youngest children in the current survey round were born to mothers at the oldest ages). However, this sample selection issue has become less significant over time, as with every passing survey round the older children are increasingly born to women who gave birth at mainstream childbearing ages. See the "Sample Changes over Time" paragraphs in the Sample Design section for more detailed information about maternal age at birth.

Click a topic below for more information:

NLSY79 Mothers

Table 1 presents a synopsis of some of the attitudinal and behavioral questions that have been asked of mothers, and of their children when they were both pre- and early teenagers, and then again when they were young adults. When these mothers were in their middle to later adolescent years they were asked about their own educational, employment and family aspirations. The mothers' records in the NLSY79 main Youth also contain information about their progression through school, their employment experiences and their marriage and childbearing experiences, all systematically updated at every survey round. Comprehensive annual income and individual earnings information is also collected, along with household structure updates, and county of residence information (available on a separate geocode file). Attitudinal information and self-reports on mental health and wellbeing (for example attitudes towards women's roles, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and the CES-D depression scale) are available in selected years. A battery of tests measuring maternal cognition, plus measures of educational achievement are also available. For example, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, or ASVAB, was administered to NLSY79 main Youth respondents in 1980 and scores are available for about 94% of the cohort's members. PSAT, SAT I, or ACT scores were also coded for about a quarter of NLSY79 respondents from Transcript Surveys between 1980 and 1983. A cognition module was added to the NLSY79 main Youth health section in 2006; this same module is included in the expanded health module introduced into the Young Adult survey in 2010. Additionally, there is a short series of questions on the mother's religious affiliation and upbringing, plus information pertaining to some of the less normative activities she might have been involved in. Finally, the mother's first survey round in 1979 included a series of questions measuring the occupation and earnings of her parents (i.e. one set of the children's grandparents) that provides information on the socio-economic background she experienced while she was growing up. This background input was then greatly enhanced by a detailed childhood residence history that was collected retrospectively for all NLSY79 women in 1988. We will incorporate some of this information above into our discussion of research possibilities that follows.

NLSY79 Children 10-14

Once NLSY79 children reach age 10, they were asked about their own behaviors and experiences, and, as shown in Table 1, some of the information obtained was comparable with that obtained some years earlier from their mothers. These self-reports for children 10 and over included details about joint activities and interactions with parents, parental rules about activities and behaviors, household decision-making processes, peer pressures, attitudes about school, after-school employment and other extra-curricular activities, incipient substance use, involvement in a variety of non-normative activities, religious activities, dating relationships, sex education and expectations about future marriage and family building activities. Starting in 1992 the content of the child self-report was expanded to include details about within-family interactions, and--for those age 13 and over--items about sexual activity. Mothers were asked to report on their children's schooling success (e.g., grade repetition, reasons for success or failure), and each child ages 10-14 was asked to rate the quality of the school they attended and how they felt about their life in general. Questions about parental supervision activities were also directed to the mother.

NLSY79 Young Adults (age 15+)

All children who reach their 15th birthday during the survey year are interviewed as young adults. Reports by these young adults often have considerable overlap with questions asked of their mothers at similar ages. For example, scores are available for the Pearlin Mastery, Rosenberg Self-Esteem and CES-D scales for young adults and their mothers during their late teens. Beginning in 2016, children ages 12 to 14 have also been fielded as part of the Young Adult data collection. The 14 year olds answer the same questions as the 15-16 year olds, but the 12 and 13 year olds answer far fewer questions, including some previously asked in the CSAS.

Table 1. NLSY79 Mothers & Children: Comparable Attitudinal and Behavioral Questions
NLSY79 Mothers Children 10 & Older Young Adults
Child HH Chore Expectations & Time Spent Family Decision-Making Decision making in the family, with spouse/partner, and with other parent
Childhood Residence, own Time Away from Parents; Contact with Nonresident Father Reasons Left Mother's HH; Contact with Nonresident Mother and Father
Cigarette, Alcohol, & Drug Use, own Cigarette, Alcohol, & Drug Use Cigarette, Alcohol, & Drug Use
Delinquency; Police Contact Non-Normative Behavior Delinquency; Police/Justice System Contact; Non-Normative Behavior
Depression Scale (CES-D) Child Moods Depression Scale (CES-D)
Early Childbearing Early Childbearing Early Childbearing
Early Sexual Activity Early Sexual Activity Early/Current Sexual Activity
Educational Aspirations/Expectations, self & child Educational Expectations Educational Expectations
Employment, own Employment/Work for Pay Employment
HOME Items on Family Activities Parent-Child Joint Activities Home Items asked about YA's children
Knowledge of Child's Friends How Much Tell Parents about Friends How Much Tell Parents about Friends (Under age 19)
Locus of Control Peer Pressure Peer Pressure (Under age 19)
Marriage & Birth Expectations Marriage & Birth Expectations Marriage & Birth Expectations
Neighborhood Safety Neighborhood Safety Neighborhood Safety
Parental Involvement in Child's School Parental Involvement in Child's School Parental Involvement in Child's School
Parental Monitoring Parental Monitoring Limit Setting
Parent-Child Closeness Parent-Child "Closeness"/Interaction Parent-Child "Closeness"/Interaction
Pearlin Mastery -- Pearlin Mastery
Pregnancy/AIDS Knowledge Pregnancy Knowledge Pregnancy Knowledge
Relationship (Marital) Quality Mother-Father Consensus; Dating Relationship Quality (Spouse, Partner, or Steady Boy-/Girlfriend) Mother-Father Consensus; Dating
Religion, own & child's Religion & Attendance Religion & Attendance, own and spouse/partner's
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Child Loneliness; SPPC Rosenberg Self-Esteem
School Discipline, own & child's School Discipline School Discipline
School Rating/Satisfaction, own & child's Child Satisfaction with School Child Satisfaction with School
Sex Education (NA in main Youth) Sex Education Sex Education
Trouble in School (BPI & MS child items) Bring Parent to School Bring Parent to School; BPI asked of YA's children
TV Viewing by Child TV Viewing TV Viewing
Women's Roles Gender Role Attitudes Women's Roles
Note: Items in the "NLSY79 Mothers" column that are qualified with "own" refer to the mother's reports about her own behavior; questions where she reports on her own AND her child(ren)'s behavior are noted.

Introduction

In this section we present examples of a number of research options for which the current data set is highly appropriate. Again we consider both within- and cross-generational research possibilities as we emphasize that a strength of these data is that not only can they be used to explore connections between childhood, adolescence and adulthood, but also to examine connections across generations going back to maternal ages that closely match the ages many of our young adults are now. Additionally, the NLSY79 has large samples at many ages, a large sibling sample, and substantial minority oversamples.

The primary limitation to using the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult data is that these young adults cannot be generalized to the overall US population of similar ages. Although their mothers are representative of youth ages 14-21 who were living in the United States in 1979, the sample has not been refreshed to reflect changing population characteristics resulting from immigration. However, a subset of these children can be compared with members of the NLSY97 cohort as there is overlap in the years of birth between the two data sets, and the NLSY97 is nationally representative. Additionally, as pointed out earlier, the older young adults are primarily born to younger mothers. However, with every passing wave of data collection, this issue of heterogeneity at the older child ages becomes less of a limitation as the young adult sample is not only increasing in size, but the older young adults are becoming more representative of a broader spectrum of individuals in their twenties who have been born to a more representative group of women. And importantly, the older children at this time represent an ideal sample for exploring a wide range of programmatic and policy issues related to the adjustment process and mainstream economic and social assimilation of disadvantaged youth, while at the same time permitting comparisons with children who have been born to relatively younger but middle class mothers. Samples at the younger ages, however, are quite heterogeneous, especially when children from different birth cohorts are pooled.

We present topical information pertaining to mothers and to their children in both childhood and young adulthood in Table 1. Information from this table will be selectively utilized in our research examples below.

Table 1. Cross-Generational Research Possibilities
Maternal Background & Inputs Childhood Mediators YA Mediators & Outcomes
Demographic 
Race/Ethnicity 
Religion
Region 
Urban/Rural 
Migration Patterns 
Behavioral 
Age at Menarche 
Age at 1st Sex 
Age at 1st Birth 
Age at 1st Drug Use 
Age at 1st Marriage 
Deviant Activity 
Social Psychological 
Self-Esteem 
Depression 
Locus of Control 
Mastery 
Women's Roles 
Early Formative Influences 
Goals/Expectations for Education 
Educational Attainment 
School to Work Transition 
Marital History/Relationship Quality 
Job History 
Military Service 
Recipiency 
Father's Background (for years married to mother)
Pre-/Postnatal Information 
Maternal Work History 
Child Care in 1st Three Years 
Temperament 
Motor and Social Development 
Body Parts 
Memory for Location 
Digit Span 
PIAT Math 
PIAT Reading 
PPVT-R 
HOME 
BPI (Behavior Problems) 
SPPC (Self Perception) 
Preschool/Head Start 
Schooling 
Health 
Relationship with Parents 
Risk Taking 
Depression 
Gender 
Attitudes 
TV Viewing 
Physical development (height & weight) 
Early work for pay
Demographic
Race/Ethnicity 
Religion 
Region 
Urban/Rural 
Migration Patterns 
Behavioral 
Age at Menarche 
Age at 1st Sex 
Age at 1st Birth 
Age at 1st Drug Use 
Age at 1st Marriage 
Age at 1st Cohabitation 
Deviant Activity 
Sexual Activity 
Dating Activity 
Social Psychological 
Self-Esteem
Depression 
Mastery
Women's Roles 
Goals/Expectations for Education 
Educational Attainment 
School to Work Transition 
Marital History/Relationship Quality 
Job History 
Military Service 
Recipiency 
Transition to Parenthood 
Parenting attitudes and behaviors 
Father's Background (for non-residential fathers)

Exploring Cognitive and Socio-Emotional Trajectories

The NLSY79 Child and Young Adult study is one of the few large-scale data sets that permit researchers to examine the same children repeatedly over time, allowing them to explore linkages between intellectual and emotional development, or the stability of scores across multiple survey waves. For example, it is possible to examine connections between infant and early childhood cognitive batteries such as the Kagan Memory for Location assessment, the Body Parts assessments, or the Temperament Scale, and their later intellectual development. Further, one can explore possible causal connections between these early cognition measures and not only levels of subsequent cognition (as measured by PPVT or PIAT scores, for example), but also with intellectual trajectories over the early childhood to middle adolescent period. Researchers can also consider variations in trajectories across different socio-economic or racial/ethnic groups. Variations in trajectories may be linked with differences in life cycle paths and these data contain a range of information relating to family structure and family social and economic well-being over time. As of the current survey round, more than 80 percent of children born to the NLSY79 women have been followed up through age 15, or through all of their "testing years." More than two-thirds of the children ever reported by interviewed NLSY79 mothers have been interviewed at least once as a young adult.

Validity of Repeat Measures

These data may be used to explore the face validity of selected assessments over time. As already noted, some children have taken the PIAT assessments as many as five times, so it is possible to examine the stability of normed scores over time (bearing in mind that the sample cases were normed against national standards). Similarly, mothers have repeatedly completed a 28-item behavior problems scale for all of their children as they have aged from 4 to 14 years. One can also consider how assessment trajectories may be linked to other family factors, including scores on the HOME scale (described in detail in the child assessment sections of this users guide). Repeated measures on this HOME scale provide comprehensive information about the quality of the child's cognitive and socio-emotional home environment for the first 14 years of a child's life. Taken in conjunction with related family information, the repeated measures on these scales allow researchers to explore relevant connections in a more comprehensive and methodologically refined manner than is typically possible. The availability of many sibling pairs (see Tables 5 and 6 in Sample Design) also permits a more careful exploration of how within-family transitions can alter intellectual and socio-emotional developmental processes. Finally, as we describe in sections that follow, selected assessments may also be of value as intervening measures when exploring various within- and between-generational processes.

Early Family and Relationship Transitions and Behaviors

The NLSY79 child and young adult surveys provide excellent data to explore potential predictors of relationship timing, and the types of relationship trajectories that youth follow from mid adolescence and on into adulthood. Beginning at age 13, children report their early sexual activity and fertility experiences. Starting at age 15, in-depth information is collected about relationships in which they have been involved. Beginning with the 1998 survey round, a sequence of items that describe the full range of heterosexual relationships that sexually active youth can be part of are included in the young adult data collection. Family and maternal inputs, as well as over a decade of assessments from childhood, can be used as predictors of transitions into early relationships and also to explore a variety of questions such as why some early relationships last and others do not; why some cohabitations ultimately turn into marriages; and why some young adults have children early while others delay parenthood. It is also possible to investigate why some youth from relatively disadvantaged families effectively avoid some of the hurdles posed by early parenthood whereas others are less successful, and to explore intergenerational tendencies to form early relationships and begin childbearing at young ages.

Young Adult Schooling and Work Outcomes

The young adult data provide an excellent vehicle for examining educational progressions and transitions into the work force. And again, we emphasize that these outcomes can be linked to a rich range of child and early young adult data available from many prior survey rounds (for example, how might child cognitive or behavioral trajectories be linked to greater or lesser success in later educational progressions, or how might early relationship patterns impact transitions into the workforce). Schooling and work outcomes among these young adults can also be compared with the trajectories that their mothers took a generation earlier.

In addition to collecting detailed information about their post-secondary college experiences, when these youth were juniors/seniors in high school, they were asked about all the colleges they applied to. This information can be compared against actual college attendance. Data on specific colleges applied to and attended are available on the restricted geocode files.

In terms of employment, information is available about summer and school year employment from early adolescence onward. During the late adolescent and early adult years a lot of data is gathered regarding the nature and intensity of employment and training experiences. These data are described more fully in topic specific sections of this users guide and here we just point out that young adult educational trajectories, family transformations, and dimensions of employment can all be carefully linked in order to provide a better understanding of the associations, and perhaps causal linkages among these major life cycle events.

Geographic Moves, Location, and Employment

A special geocode file is available for all survey rounds for the main respondents in the NLSY79, and for 1994 to the current survey round for all young adults regardless of their residence. This data file can be linked with all of the NLSY79 main, younger child, and young adult data. Because many of these youth have been effectively tracked since birth, first in their mother's home and then increasingly in their own homes, these data offer unique opportunities to investigate the inherently complex connections that exist between geographic moves, early family structure transitions, and human capital. Migration of young people is an important feature of their early life course, and these geographic data permit a careful study of residential move patterns, their determinants, and consequences. The migration literature points to the importance of family connections in helping to explain migration. The residence information available for young adults can also be linked to data on their past locations, as well as to data on the current location of selected family members.

The availability of matched county-level information over most of these children's lives also allows potential connections between the residential dislocation of children and their intellectual and academic outcomes to be explored. For example, it is possible to examine whether or not younger children and young adults are academically disadvantaged if they are subject to repeated geographic movements throughout their formative years. These locational data also support explorations of how geographic trajectories might impact earnings during the early young adult years, particularly when this kind of geographic information is augmented by knowledge of school quality.

Non-Normative Behaviors across Generations

As the information we present in the section on Life Cycle Profiles for the NLSY79 Children shows, this data set presents many opportunities to look at cross-generational tendencies for family members to repeat non-normative behaviors (see the NLSY79 User's Guide for details about the mother's record). For example, the child/young adult data can be used to explore substance use trajectories over time and then to investigate possible linkages between these trajectories and a wide range of parallel child and family behaviors/attitudes. Since many of these data elements are available for both the children and their mothers at comparable life cycle points, it is possible to not only examine whether certain behaviors tend to be repeated across the generations, but also to consider the kinds of family units that appear more protective and hence evidence a better ability to break intergenerational connections of activities or behaviors that might typically be considered non-productive. Use of the young adult geocode file can further enhance these kinds of studies as the county-level identifiers that are included in the geocode file provide data to help sort out the potential relevance of area-level factors that may either additively or interactively affect connections within and between generations.

As illustrated in the section on Life Cycle Profiles for the NLSY79 Children and Table 1 above, there are many data elements that are available for both mothers and their children including information on early sexual activity, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale, the Pearlin mastery measure, depression measures, items measuring attitudes towards the roles of women in society, school satisfaction, and early (during adolescence) expectations regarding family, education and work. All of these inputs, along with a wide range of behavioral information, permit researchers to sort out cross-generational socio-economic predictors of non-normative child behaviors from other, perhaps more subtle, non-normative mother-to-child connections. Further, this research area can be enhanced by the large number of sibling pairs available in the child/young adult generation.

How Children Affect Mothers

For those interested in exploring possible feedback effects, the availability of repeated child measures of several behaviors and attitudes, in conjunction with detailed information about maternal behaviors, permits one to investigate the effect of changing child behaviors on subsequent actions of their mothers. For example, just as one can examine the impact of maternal employment on a child's behavior or changes in a child's behavior, one can also explore how changes in a child's behavior or health can affect subsequent maternal employment decisions.

Variation in High School and College Attendance

The NLSY79 data file includes in-depth information relating to both maternal/family and youth priors that are typically considered as significant analytical predictors of young adult schooling decisions and behaviors. As noted earlier, there has been a substantial increase in the number of youth who have passed through the primary college ages and hence censuring issues associated with very early school leaving have been reduced. As of the current survey round, the data set offers large samples of young adults past adolescence including fairly substantial minority samples. The child data collection includes a wide range of information asked of the mothers and children about school progression patterns, parent-school interaction processes, and child and parental satisfaction with the child's schooling. The young adult survey then collects a range of information about the high school completion process as well as college attendance. If a young adult has attended college since the date of last interview, the name of the current or most recent college attended is asked as well as the start and stop dates for attendance. Young adults in college are asked their major, whether they are part or full-time students, the cost of attending college, and if they have received degrees of any type. The young adult surveys ask questions about financial aid: whether or not a loan was received and, if so, the amount and how much of the years expenses it covered; whether or not the young adult received work study, scholarships, grants, fellowships, assistantships, as well as various other forms of help from government, institutions, friends, or family. Beginning in 2000, an additional series of questions has been included that ask about all colleges that have been applied to and whether or not the youth was accepted. Given that the college attendance questions have been asked repeatedly since 1994, the data now permit one to construct college trajectories for a relatively large population. These college profiles can be linked with early employment success, differentiating between white, black, and Hispanic youth.

These educational profiles can also be linked with early adult family-related activities. It is also possible to investigate the extent to which cognitive and socio-emotional tests administered in earlier waves are useful predictors of early career or family success, independent of the host of family factors known to be associated with child development.

Within-Family Differences in Outcomes

Because the NLSY79 Child sample is comprised of all children born to female respondents, many sibling clusters have been interviewed over time making it possible to explore the origins of differences between siblings in cognitive, emotional, and particularly behavioral outcomes. It is also possible to clarify the independent impact of differential family behaviors reflecting the reality that children from the same parents may nonetheless encounter different family processes due to variations in their parents' life cycle stages or sibling placement or gender.

A substantial number of children have one to three siblings, and the bulk of these siblings are now of young adult age (see Tables 5 and 6 in Sample Design). In addition to sharing many common data elements, siblings also have unique background characteristics. In the NLSY79, the HOME scale can provide insights into variations in child raising patterns by child parity, gender, or other characteristics such as health status. Many of the older children and young adults are within two or three years of each other in age so their outcomes, such as employment or family attributes can be measured at approximately similar life cycle points. Of course, with every additional survey round, the heterogeneity of the sample increases, bringing more children who have been born to a wider age range of mothers into the young adult sample. It is therefore possible, for example, to explore how child-raising practices for individual young adults may be sensitive to the age of their mother at birth and how this may translate into considerable variation in adolescent and young adult behaviors for children in the same family.

Child Health and Child/Young Adult Outcomes

Over the years, the NLSY79 main, child, and young adult interviews have included a number of questions designed to measure various dimensions of the physical and emotional development of the children. Mothers have reported on limiting health conditions, utilization of health services, illness and accidents. This type of health related information can be linked with all the other developmental and behavioral information available about the child and his or her family. Table 2 summarizes the types of health variables found in the Child data files. Key health items from the Young Adult surveys are listed in Table 3.

Table 2. Health Data in the NLSY79 Child Surveys
Child Health 1986 1988-1992 1994 1996-2002 2004-2016
Child's eye and hair color M        
Does health limit school or play M M M M M
Physical, emotional, or mental condition requiring: treatment, medicine,
or special equipment
M M M M M
Type/duration of limiting health conditions M M M M M
Accidents/injuries needing medical attention in last 12 months M M M M M
Accidents/injuries needing hospitalization since last interview/ since birth   M M M M
Number of illnesses requiring medical attention or treatment M M M M M
Date of last routine health checkup M M M M M
Menarche; age at 1st menses for female child (and mother) M M M M M
Right/left handedness       M M
Date of last dental checkup/work M M M M M
Source of health insurance, if any M M M M M
Behavioral, emotional, or mental problems; did insurance cover doctor visit M M M M M
Or prescription drugs taken to help control activity/behavior M M M M M
Height and body weight of child M-I M-I M-I M-I M-I
Healthcare during pregnancy leading to child's birth1 M M M M M
Postnatal infant healthcare and feeding1 M M M M M
Temperament Scales (<4 years) M M M M M
Motor and Social Development Scale (<4 years) M M M M M
Behavior Problems Index (4+ years) M M M M M
Asthma         M/C
Cigarette use; age first smoked; frequency   C C C C
Alcohol use; age first drank; frequency   C C C C
Marijuana use; age first used; frequency   C C C C
Substance use (like glue, gas, sprays, fluids) that are "sniffed/ huffed";
age first used; frequency
    C C C
Other drug use (LSD, cocaine, uppers, downers); age first used; frequency   C C C C
 
NOTE: Users are reminded that, while Child and Young Adult health items are presented separately in these tables, all child health items were collected for young adults when they were age 14 or younger in the years their mothers were interviewed.
"C" denotes child report. "M" denotes mother report. "M-I" denotes either mother report or interviewer measurement; flag indicating source of report appears in the data file for each survey year.
1 Pre- and postnatal items have been asked in the mother's main Youth interview since 1982 so that most information has been collected for most births. This information includes child's birth weight and length, mother's weight gain, type of delivery, etc.
Table 3. Health Data in the NLSY79 Young Adult Surveys
Young Adult Health 1994 1996-1998 2000-2002 2004 2006-present 
 
Does health limit work/school YA YA YA YA YA
Type and duration of health limitation YA YA YA YA YA
Recent accidents, injuries, illnesses, hospitalization1 YA YA YA YA YA
Height, body weight YA YA YA YA YA
Asthma       YA YA
Healthy Behavior       YA YA
Stressful Events         YA
Right/left handedness   YA      
Menarche (age at 1st menses) information (females) YA YA YA YA YA
Health insurance coverage for self YA YA YA YA YA
CES-Depression Scale (7 items) YA YA YA YA YA
Prenatal care (females) YA YA YA YA YA
Health care and nutrition during pregnancy (females) YA YA YA YA YA
Cigarette and alcohol use during pregnancy (females) YA YA YA YA YA
Drug use during pregnancy (females) YA YA      
Age 29/30 Health Module2         Since 2010
Age 41/42 Health Module2         Since 2014
Note: Users are reminded that, while Child and Young Adult health items are presented separately in these tables, all child health items were collected for young adults when they were age 14 or younger in the years their mothers were interviewed.
1 Information on recent illnesses, routine check-ups, and health insurance for young adults living in the mother's household was reported by the mother in the fertility section of the main Youth interview through 2016. All other young adult health items are obtained through the Young Adult report.
2When the first extended health module was introduced in 2010, all YAs age 29 or older were routed into it. In 2012, those YAs age 29/30 and anyone over those ages but not interviewed in 2010 went into this health module. Beginning in 2014, additional questions were added for respondents over the age of 40 and YAs who were ages 29/30 or 41/42, along with anyone else needing to complete either their first or second health module entered the health module.

For each child, the collection of health data essentially begins prior to their birth and encompasses a wide range of prenatal inputs about the mother's behavior and attributes (including weight gain during pregnancy and key facts about each pregnancy and birth), as well as summary health measures for the mother, including periodic body weight and height measures over her own NLSY79 time line.

During childhood, health information is obtained through maternal reports. As children age into the young adult years, they provide self reported health information. During the first year of life, a relatively intensive body of child health information is collected that consists of birth/early infant-connected health problems, as well as medical visitations for both sick and well care, including the nature of the contact and the need for hospitalization. During the first four years of life, mothers complete a motor and social development scale about each child (described in detail in the Child Assessments section of this users guide) that assesses the maturational development of the child compared to other children of the same age. Height and body weight are reported or measured at each interview point. Then continuing over the child/young adult's life, reports are given biennially on accidents, injuries, and hospitalizations. One advantage that this data collection provides over institutionally collected health data is that, because it is self-reported by mother or child, it avoids biases due to the fact that different race, class, and ethnic groups are differentially likely to actually contact appropriate health individuals or institutions.

Across the surveys, considerable ancillary information is also collected about each child/young adult that details limiting health conditions (with respect to school, peers, and work); emotional problems; and the utilization of specialized medical, dental, and psychiatric services. Much of this information has been collected for each child repeatedly, plus collected for each child in a family unit. Additionally, introduced in 2004, a detailed retrospective on asthma incidence and prevalence was asked of all mothers, children and young adults. This makes it possible to link asthma histories with factors such as body weight and height over the years, a variety of potential illnesses, maternal and youth smoking, maternal activity limitation due to asthma, and a detailed geographic residence profile, all of which can help sort out possible determinants of child/young adult asthma.

The overview of research applications is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather to suggest possible ways to approach the data, and to illustrate that there are many research questions waiting to be explored. Researchers interested in using the data are encouraged to draw on a variety of other NLSY79 informational sources including the other sections of this users guide, the NLSY79 User's Guide, public use Child documentation, and in particular, the Child and Young Adult questionnaires.

Child/Young Adult Documentation

In addition to this online User's Guide, a number of documentation items are provided to help users understand the Child and Young Adult data. Except for the Codebook, which is accessed through the NLS Investigator search and extraction Web program, all of these items are available within the Child section of this website. Additional assistance is available through NLS User Services.

Codebook

The NLSY79 Child and Young Adult (and main Youth) data files are each documented by a codebook that lists each variable and briefly describes its content. Each variable has a codebook page that contains the variable's unique reference number, coding categories for the variable, frequency distributions, minimum and maximum values, and any special notes. Entries for questionnaire items also contain links to the previous and next question in the instrument. The hyperlinked reference numbers that appear in codebook entries for created variables simply take the user to the next item in the list, generally within the area of interest. Users can review codebook pages for variables of interest through NLS Investigator, and extracts of variables include a custom codebook file containing codebook pages for all variables in the extract. For more information, see the Investigator User Guide.

Child and Young Adult survey instruments

Since most of the constructed variables and test scores found within the Child data set are derived directly from one or more survey instruments, users should have access to at least one set of questionnaires. Copies of the Child and Young Adult questionnaires and interview aids are available in either PDF or HTML format on the Questionnaires page. This page has links to the following questionnaires:

  • Child Supplement (CS): public user version of the Child Supplement questionnaire (paper and CAPI); contains the interviewer-administered assessments
  • Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS): public user version of the self-report questionnaire for children age 10-14; administered on paper, PDA or laptop
  • Mother Supplement (MS): public user version of the maternal report questionnaire for each child; contains the mother-report assessments
  • Young Adult Questionnaire: public user version of the Young Adult CAPI questionnaire
  • Child School Survey Principal Questionnaire: paper questionnaire about school characteristics completed by school principal for each child in the 1995-1996 NLSY79 Child School Survey
  • Child School Survey Schooling Questionnaire: paper questionnaire completed by school personnel about each child in the 1995-1996 NLSY79 Child School Survey

NLS bibliographies

NLS User Services maintains an annotated, searchable archive of NLS research available by clicking the tab in the main menu. Records of more than 9,000 journal articles, working papers, monographs, reports, presentations, theses, and dissertations are available for users to search, retrieve, and print customized listings of NLS research. CHRR periodically compiles listings of research based on the NLSY79 child data. Some of these bibliographies are listed under Child Survey Resources on the Research/Technical Reports page.

Other documentation

In addition to the codebooks, variable descriptions, search indices, and items described above, CHRR provides the following materials to users as additional documentation for the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult data:

  • NLSY79 Child Handbooks 1986-1992 (detailed information about the NLSY79 Child assessments and supplementary information about sample constraints in previous survey rounds)
  • Child Assessment Tables reports (tabular summaries of assessment scores for survey rounds from 1994 to the present)

These handbooks and assessment tables reports are available on the Research/Technical Reports page.

Important information and errata

Periodically CHRR provides users with updates to the existing data or documentation. Notes are sometimes prepared that clarify certain elements of the current files. This information is compiled into a list of Errata posted to the Child/YA User's Guide. Updates to previous data rounds are noted in the documentation for those rounds. Users are strongly encouraged to consult the errata page as they are working on their research projects to ensure that they are aware of any notices that may affect variables of interest.

Additional help is available

Please contact NLS User Services with questions and comments about the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult surveys.

Linking Children, Young Adults, and Mothers

The Child/Young Adult data files contain many constructed variables drawn from multiple sources, including both cross-sectional and longitudinal information in both the child and mother records. Users of the Child/Young Adult data who wish to construct variables not found in the Child/Young Adult files may access the mothers' records in the main Youth files in order to obtain the necessary inputs. A useful variable for linking the mother's longitudinal record to the child is C00052.00, which defines the first survey year (of the mother) following the child's date of birth. The question name for this variable is FSTYRAFT. (NOTE: Children born prior to the 1979 survey date are assigned 1979 as their first post-birth survey point.)

In general, a researcher interested in creating a variable that references a particular post-birth survey point for all children would need to follow a two-step procedure. For example, to create a variable that defines the first post-birth survey maternal school enrollment status for all children from information collected at the mother's survey dates, one would take the following steps:

  1. Find Question Name = FSTYRAFT (reference # C00052.00) to define the appropriate survey year following the child's date of birth
  2. Use the value for FSTYRAFT to choose a maternal enrollment status variable, depending on the date of the birth of the child

If the child's first post-birth survey year FSTYRAFT is 1982, the maternal enrollment status variable as of the 1982 interview (Qname = ATTSCH1982, reference # C00570.00) would be selected. Similarly the appropriate enrollment status information could be combined across the relevant surveys into one created "first post-birth survey enrollment status" variable.

For more refined linking procedures, the user may need to access maternal interview dates as well as the dates of many relevant events, such as school leaving, job changes, and marital changes. Variables that are keyed to the child's date of birth or to the mother's date of interview can be used to (1) link social, economic, and demographic maternal behaviors with a child's birth or age at a particular point or to (2) define the survey point closest to a particular child's birth or attained age.

The pre- and postnatal variables (C03200.00-C03392.10) are already defined in an appropriate life cycle context, since they reference either the pregnancy leading up to a particular birth or an event/behavior during the first year following a birth. A missing value in this series of constructed child variables means that at least one input from the main Youth file was missing (refer to the note in the Child codebook for C02700.00).

Linking Data Files across Cohorts

The child identification code (CPUBID, C00001.00) allows the user to link children with their siblings on the NLSY79 Child files and with their mothers on the main NLSY79 files. The child ID is created by appending a 2-digit code (01 to 11) to the end of the mother's public ID (R00001.00 in the NLSY79 data). Thus, children with the same first 5 digits in their IDs are siblings. Since the child ID contains the first 5 digits of the mother ID, either the child ID or the mother ID (MPUBID, C00002.00) enables the users wishing to create a mother-based file to extract maternal characteristics and write them out only for mothers. Appendix H provides additional information about the identification codes available in the Child/YA data.

Child ID vs. Young Adult ID. Users will note that identification codes are provided for all children as CPUBID (C00001.00) in the CHILD BACKGROUND area of interest and again for young adults as CASEID (Y00001.00) in YA COMMON KEY VARIABLES. The only distinction between these two variables is that the young adult CASEID is only available for children who have been interviewed as young adults. The variable called CPUBID is a comprehensive ID code with values for all children (including young adults), regardless of age or interview status. The YA CASEID is included for the convenience of users accessing only the Young Adult data.

Linking Children and Young Adults to Mothers. Linking NLSY79 mothers to their children can be done by using the case identification code for both the mother (R00001. in the main youth file) and the child (C00001.00). To merge the files, save the Child and Young Adult case ID (C00001.00, CPUBID or the Young Adult case ID, Y00001.00, CASEID) and mother case ID (C00002.00, MPUBID) from an extract of the Child and Young Adult file and save the mother case ID (R00001.00) from an extract from the main NLSY79 file. The mother's case ID will be the same in both files. The CPUBID child ID is provided for all children, regardless of whether they are under age 15 or classified as young adults in any survey year. Appendix E (SPSS) and Appendix F (SAS) in the Codebook Supplement offer sample programs designed to assist users in merging files.

User note: MOTHERID

In the CHILD BACKGROUND Area of Interest users will find mother ID labeled MPUBID, C00002.00 for all children regardless of age. When each round of the Young Adult is made available as a single-round preliminary release, this same variable, created only for young adults, appears as MOTHERID in the YA COMMON KEY VARIABLES Area of Interest.

NLS Tutorial: Linking Mothers and Children. We have produced a tutorial that gives detailed instructions on how to link a data file of young adult children extracted from the Child/Young Adult database with a file from the main Youth file for mothers. This example with step-by-step instructions will assist users still uncertain about the linking process.

Interviewer Remarks

Child

Interviewer Remarks in the Child Supplement. At the conclusion of each child interview, interviewers complete a summary evaluation of the overall interview and a series of "testing conditions" items, found at the end of the Child Supplement. These items, most of which are prefixed for with the phrase TESTING CONDITIONS or INT REMARKS, are assigned to the CHILD SUPPLEMENT area of interest. The following titles are used to describe these items in the documentation:

  • INT REMARKS: ANY PROBLEMS WITH CHILD'S HEARING?
  • INT REMARKS: ANY PROBLEMS WITH CHILD'S STATE OF HEALTH?
  • INT REMARKS: ANY PROBLEMS WITH CHILD'S VISUAL SHARPNESS
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM DISTRACTIONS
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM INTERRUPTIONS
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM LIGHTING
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM NOISE
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM OTHER SOURCE
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM PRESENCE OF OTHERS
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE FROM TEMPERATURE
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: CHILD'S ATTITUDE TOWARD BEING TESTED
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: CHILD'S COOPERATION
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: CHILD'S MOTIVATION/INTEREST
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: CHILD'S PERSEVERANCE/PERSISTENCE
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: CHILD'S RAPPORT WITH INTERVIEWER
  • TESTING CONDITIONS: WERE THERE ANY OTHER SOURCES OF INTERFERENCE?

The Child Supplement also contains two items in which the Interviewer indicates how shy the child was at the beginning and end of the interview. In 1986, these two items are documented as follows:

  1. SHYNESS AT START
  2. SHYNESS AT END

After 1986, the titles for these two items are as follows:

  1. HOW SHY/ANXIOUS WAS CHILD WHEN HE/SHE MET INTERVIEWER
  2. TESTING CONDITIONS: HOW SHY/ANXIOUS WAS CHILD AT END OF SUPPLEMENT?

In addition, the CHILD SUPPLEMENT area of interest contains interviewer check items that indicate the following:

  • THIS HEALTH INFORMATION RELEVANT TO FUTURE INTERVIEWS?
  • WHERE WAS CHILD SUPPLEMENT ADMINISTERED?
  • IN WHAT LANGUAGE WAS THIS CHILD SUPPLEMENT ADMINISTERED?
  • ANY SKIP ERRORS, QUESTIONS THAT WERE CONFUSING OR DIDN'T WORK?

Assessment-Specific Interviewer Remarks. At the conclusion of each interviewer-administered assessment in the Child Supplement, there is a series of interviewer remarks designed to describe the factors that might influence a child's performance. For each assessment the interview records:

  • the child's energy level
  • who else was present during testing
  • what impact others might have had on a child's performance
  • whether an assessment was prematurely terminated

Interviewers are also instructed to make comments in the assessments or interviewer remarks section if other languages were used in the interview to facilitate understanding. These remarks are in the CHILD SUPPLEMENT area of interest. The titles for these items are prefixed with the name of each assessment.

CSAS Interviewer Remarks. In the paper years, the Interviewer was asked to complete this question after the child had completed the Child Self-Administered Supplement:

  • LIST QUESTIONS THAT CONFUSED, ANGERED, OR CAUSED DISCOMFORT TO THE CHILD OR QUESTIONS THAT YOU FEEL THE CHILD DID NOT ANSWER TRUTHFULLY. EXPLAIN.

Starting in 2002, when the Child Self-Administered Supplement became a CAPI instrument, the CSAS interviewer remarks question is documented as followed:

  • CHILD SELF-ADMIN: INT REMARKS-NO QUESTION CONFUSED OR ANGERED CHILD

Starting in 2006, an additional question was added:

  • CHILD SELF-ADMIN: INT REMARKS - CHILD HAD PROBLEMS WITH HOW TO USE DEVICE (LAPTOP)

Interviewer Remarks in the Mother Supplement. In the Mother Supplement CASI section, the interviewer indicates the language of administration, which, if any, questions caused problems and rates the mother's attitude about using the CASI section. These items are documented as follows:

  • MS INTERVIEWER REMARKS: IN WHAT LANGUAGE WAS THIS MS ADMINISTERED
  • MS INTERVIEWER REMARKS: RATING OF RESPONDENT'S UNDERSTANDING OF QUESTIONS
  • MS INTERVIEWER REMARKS: NO QUESTIONS CONFUSED, ANGERED RESPONDENT

Important information about interviewer observations

Users are encouraged to examine both the assessment-specific remarks and the general interviewer observations when evaluating quality issues associated with assessment reliability. In the majority of cases, interviewers indicated that they encountered no particular problems or distractions and they viewed the interviewing environment as quite appropriate. Where an assessment was prematurely terminated, the reason for the termination is frequently noted in the interviewer remarks at the end of that particular session. Based on one's research intentions, individual researchers can choose to exclude certain children from their study. For example, children coded with low energy level or who were in testing environments characterized by substantial interference could be excluded from analyses.

In some instances interviewers neglected to complete the remarks items. Thus, an individual user should proceed with caution when using an interviewer remark that suggests that no one other than the target child was present during testing. This is an unlikely scenario in situations where younger children are being assessed. With respect to the interviewer remark items that indicate the presence or absence of parents or siblings, a positive response (i.e., one or greater) indicates that this particular relation was present. However, the absence of that relation was often left blank or not coded zero, particularly in survey years prior to CAPI.

To date, little in-depth analysis has been completed that uses the interviewer reports of testing conditions. One study based on the NLSY79 child data found that differences in achievement test scores by race/ethnicity could be partly explained by testing conditions, including interviewer characteristics, interviewer-child interactions, and the testing environment (Kim et al., 2003). In a study of intergenerational predictors of racial differences in achievement, Mandara, Greene and Varner used the testing evaluation items to construct a scale of "test-taking motivation." They found that motivation was one important predictor of achievement as measured by PIAT Math and Reading scores (Mandara, et al, 2006).

The NLSY Children 1992: Description and Evaluation (available on the Research/Technical Reports page) contains a discussion of the impact of testing conditions on selected outcomes. Analyses of the information about the presence of others during the testing indicate that younger children may experience some difficulty in certain cognitive tasks when there is interference in the testing environment and when other adults are present. Younger children who took the SPPC assessment tended to report more positive self-evaluation in the presence of other adults while the presence of other children tends to boost the reports of older children on this assessment. These early results helped inform the field-testing protocol so that interviewer procedures could be refined to minimize any external effects on child performance.

Young Adult

At the conclusion of each young adult interview, interviewers complete a summary evaluation of the overall interview. The Young Adult interviewer remarks section, located at the end of the questionnaire, contains interview-specific and interviewer comment information, including the type of interview (personal or telephone); the language used to conduct the interview; various interviewer remarks on respondent's race, attitude, understanding of the questions, and presence of anyone else during the interview; and interviewer identification codes. These variables are located in the "YA Interview Remarks" area of interest and have question names starting with "QIR."

Sample Weights

Appropriate sample weights are available in each year to adjust the un-weighted sample cases for the minority oversamples and year-to-year sample attrition. The sample weights for younger children and young adults:

  1. adjust the un-weighted data for sample attrition of mothers and their children since the first survey round (1979) and the sample reduction due to the loss of the military and economically disadvantaged white oversample and
  2. adjust the sample for the over-representation of black and Hispanic youth. 

For those interested in generating population estimates for prior survey rounds, sample weights for those survey rounds are available. 

Using these weights translates the un-weighted sample of children into a population that represents all children who have been born by that date to a nationally representative sample of women who were 14 to 21 on December 31, 1978. Beginning in 2002, a revised algorithm was used to compute the sample weights. For the 1986-2000 survey years, two sample weight variables are available for each year: the originally released sample weight and a revised weight using the new algorithm.

Weights are computed only for younger children who have been interviewed or young adults who have been fielded and interviewed in a given year. Children not assessed and young adults not interviewed (or interviewed but not fielded) in a given year are assigned a weight of zero for that year. Table 1 lists the complete set of child, young adult, and mother sample weights.

Table 1. NLSY79 Mother, Child, and Young Adult Sampling Weights
Cohort Question Name Survey Years
Mother SAMPWT79 1979
Child   CSAMWTyy 1986-1998
CSAMWTyyyy 2000-2016  
CSAMWTyyyy_REV 1986-2000  
Young Adult  YAyyWEIGHT 1994-current
YAyyWEIGHT_REVISED 1994-2000  

Revised Sampling Weights. Starting with the 2002 child survey round, an updated automated computation procedure was instituted to allow users to create custom sets of weights for analyses that require more than cross-sectional weighting information. The automated process was designed both to sum the same population totals and to follow the same procedures as done previously. Because of slight differences in the results, an additional set of revised cross-sectional weighting variables is provided for the Child survey years 1986-2000 (CSAMWTyyyy_REV) and for Young Adult survey years 1994-2000 (YAyyWEIGHT_REVISED). Users should find minimal differences between the two series of sample weights but are strongly encouraged to check if switching between the two types of weights affects their results.

Important information about sampling weights

Beginning in 2002, the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult sampling weights were constructed using an updated algorithm. This updated algorithm was also used to create revised weights for earlier survey rounds (identified by "REV" or "REVISED" in the question name).

The mother's sampling weight SAMPWT79 can be found in the Child-Young Adult data in the SAMPLING WEIGHTS Area of Interest.

The Child sampling weights have been assigned to two Areas of Interest in the documentation: (1) SAMPLING WEIGHTS and (2) ASSESSMENT for the relevant years.

The Young Adult weights have been assigned to the following two Areas of Interest in the documentation: (1) SAMPLING WEIGHTS and (2) YA COMMON KEY VARIABLES.

The child/young adult sample weights adjust for sample attrition of NLSY79 mothers and children (including the loss of the military and white oversamples) and for over-representation of black and Hispanic respondents. Each set of cross-sectional child sample weights is computed by multiplying the mother's 1979 sample weight by a factor that is the reciprocal of the rate at which children in particular age/sample-type/sex cells are assessed or interviewed. 

The current public release contains a complete set of custom child weights for all child survey years in which values are assigned according to the following criteria:

  • Each non-interviewed child's weight = 0.
  • Each interviewed child's weight is equal to the mother's weight multiplied by the number of children her interviewed child represents.
  • Every interviewed child represents himself or herself plus the number of non-interviewed, known children, plus the number of children estimated to have been born to non-interviewed mothers. This last set of imputed children is determined by determining the number of years since the mother was last interviewed and assigning the same number and ages of children born based on what was reported for interviewed mothers of the same sex and race.

In the other NLS cohorts, the cell collapsing code is relatively complex and allows the program to merge almost any set of adjacent cells. In creating the weights for the Child-Young Adult cohort the cell collapsing code is simpler. Generally cells are collapsed as follows:

  • Only the end points are collapsed (oldest and youngest kids)
  • The end point is the same for males and females (to follow how it is done prior to the custom weighting program)
  • Cells are collapsed if there are fewer than 10 observed children

Customized Longitudinal Weights. Researchers who need to weight individuals who participated in multiple survey rounds (i.e., such as all children who participated in 1988-2008) are referred to the custom weighting program. Caution should be used when comparing weighted estimates across years since the composition of the sample can change in subtle ways depending on who was interviewed. The custom weighting program also offers the option of getting weights for a specific set of respondent ids.

User note about fielding

Beginning in 2010, young adults over age 30 are only fielded every four years. The fielded sample is selected by age as of December 31 of the survey year, so that approximately half of the older young adults are eligible each round. Since 2010, young adults age 31-32, 35-36, 39-40, 43-44, etc., as of December 31 of the target year have not been fielded.

When the "Weight Years" option is used and "The respondents are in any or all of the selected years" is selected, the custom weights program uses the highest survey year selected to determine sample eligibility. This method most closely matches the approach taken to generate the sampling weights generated for each individual survey round (CSAMWTyyyy and YAyyWEIGHT).

If users use the "Weight Years" option to generate custom weights for respondents in any or all selected years and the highest survey round is 2010 or later, respondents not fielded in the highest year selected will be assigned a weight of 0, regardless of whether they participated in earlier rounds selected.

Users who want to get custom weights for older YAs regardless of the last year fielded when the highest survey round is 2010 or later are advised to use the "Weight IDs" option. Users can generate list of cases that they wish to weight, then copy these IDs into the "Weight IDs" dialog box on the custom weights page.

Sample Weights to Identify Interviews. Users can also employ the Child sample weight variables to delineate their analysis sample and to identify respondents interviewed in each survey round. Restricting the sample to those cases with a sample weight value greater than zero "0" will yield the set of respondents interviewed and/or assessed in a particular survey year. A child sample weight (CSAMWTyyyy_REV or CSAMWTyyyy) GT "0" will indicate the number of children with either a Mother Supplement and/or Child Supplement.

Please note that in 2000, four Young Adult respondents who were part of the pool of oversample cases that were not fielded were inadvertently interviewed. For these four respondents, their interview data are included in the public release, but their sampling weights are set to zero. Similarly, since 2010, in each survey round some Young Adults over thirty who were not fielded ended up being interviewed. For these respondents, their interview data are included in the public release, but their sampling weights are set to zero. More detail on sample weights and interview status can be found in the section Missing Data: Noninterviews and Item Nonresponse.

Where to Find the Sample Weights. The list of sample weight variables for children and young adults appears in Table 1 above.

The Child sample weights are assigned to both the SAMPLING WEIGHTS and the yearly ASSESSMENT areas of interest. Children who have been assessed or interviewed in a given year have values greater than 0 on their sample weight for that year.

The Young Adult sample weights for each year are assigned to both the SAMPLING WEIGHTS and the YA COMMON KEYVARS areas of interest. These YA sample weight variables are specific to young adults interviewed in that year so that any young adult not interviewed or any child who is not a young adult in that year is assigned a value of "0." The Young Adult sample weights are assigned to both the SAMPLING WEIGHTS and the YA COMMON KEY VARIABLES areas of interest.

A Note about Sampling Weights

NLSY79 Child and Young Adult 1994-2016 data set includes revisions to several Young Adult sampling weights as well as the replacement of two revised Child sampling weights.

Young Adult Sampling Weights. Beginning in 2010, young adults over age 30 are only interviewed every four years. The interviewed sample is selected by age as of December 31 of the survey year, so that approximately half of the older young adults are eligible each round. Since 2010, young adults age 31-32, 35-36, 39-40, 43-44, etc. as of December 31 of the target year have not been fielded.

The algorithm creating the round-specific sampling weights did not adequately account for this change in fielding, leading older YAs in the age groups that were fielded (33-34, 37-38, 41-42, etc.) to receive disproportionately high weights. The algorithm has been readjusted and the round-specific sampling weights for the interviewed YAs over age 30 have been replaced in the following variables:

Y26159.00    [YA10WEIGHT]
Y29663.00    [YA12WEIGHT]
Y33318.00    [YA14WEIGHT]

Child Sampling Weights. An error in the code creating the revised round-specific sampling weights that were released in 2002 led to the 1986 and 1988 Child Sampling weights to be incorrectly calculated. The following weights have been replaced for all affected children:

C05812.01    [CSAMWT1986_REV]
C08007.01    [CSAMWT1988_REV]

Types of Variables

The NLSY79 Child and Young Adult data release contains comprehensive information from the 1986 through the current survey round. The file also contains child-specific information from the mother's main Youth interviews. Certain variables are derived from the mother's longitudinal record while other data items represent the questions administered during the Child and Young Adult interviews and the responses from each child assessment. Finally, there is an extensive set of created variables on the file, based on the assessment and interview data.

Detailed information on the types of data available for the NLSY79 Children and Young Adults can be found by examining the field instruments and by searching the database indices. Instructions on how to search the database can be found in the Investigator User Guide. Researchers who are interested in items based on data from the mother's record are encouraged to access copies of the main Youth questionnaires and to review the NLSY79 main Youth documentation. These items are available in the NLSY79 section of the website. Information on how to link child and mother data can be found primarily in the section on Linking Children, Young Adults, and Mothers.

The NLSY79 Child data include demographic and family background, pre- and postnatal health history, home environment reports, information on child care and school experiences, items and scores from the biennial child assessments, and reports from the child "10 and older" self-report questionnaire. The Young Adult contains questionnaire items from all Young Adult interview years, covering areas such as family background, schooling, training, work and military experiences, relationship history, fertility, health, and drug and alcohol use, as well as a set of created variables for each round. Geographic information for young adults is available on a separate geocode file.

The type of variable may affect (1) the physical placement of the variable within the codebook (its sequence in the reference number list) and (2) the assignment of a variable to a particular area (or areas) of interest. Types of variables that appear in the public releases of the Child and Young Adult files include:

  1. Direct (or raw) responses from a questionnaire or assessment or other survey instrument.
  2. Recoded or edited variables constructed from raw data according to consistent procedures, e.g., coding of verbatim responses about jobs done for pay or religion other than the precoded categories. Such variables are marked as recode versions of the original.
  3. Constructed variables based on responses to more than one data item or multiple reports to the same item, either from cross-sectional or longitudinal information. Some of these created variables are indices or scale summations, such as the assessment scores, and others are individual items edited for consistency where necessary, e.g., child background characteristics such as age, date of birth, and gender. (See additional information below.)
  4. Constructed variables from a non-NLS data source, e.g., the County & City Data Book information present on the NLSY79 Young Adult geocode file.
  5. Variables provided by NORC or another outside organization based on sources not directly available to the user, e.g., the transcript data and test scores from the child school survey.
  6. Data collected from or about one universe of respondents reconstructed with a second universe as the unit of observation, e.g., variables on the NLSY79 Child data file that are based on inputs from the mother's main Youth record but linked to each child.

Constructed Child variables based on main Youth data. Constructed variables, drawn from the mothers' records, provide information on each mother's household composition, quarterly employment referenced to the birth of each child, and family background. While most information is cross-sectional, many variables link maternal events or behaviors to the child's life cycle-specific points after, or in some instances, before the child's birth. Any item from the complete record of the mother's main Youth record can be linked to the Child and Young Adult files.

Constructed Child- and Mother-Specific Variables. In addition to the questionnaire items and constructed assessment scores the NLSY79 Child data set contains a number of other constructed variables. Some constructed variables, such as pre- and postnatal care and child usual residence, are drawn from child-specific information collected in the mother's main Youth interview. Other constructed items, such as maternal household composition and family background, are created from mother-based information that does not vary across children. Constructed variables are generally found in the following Areas of Interest:

  • CHILD BACKGROUND
  • CHILD CARE
  • FAMILY BACKGROUND
  • MATERNAL HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION
  • PRE/POST NATAL CARE

These created items include sibling identifiers, maternal family background, maternal household composition at each interview, and family educational background. Details on these constructed variables can be found in the Topical Guide to the Data. Mother-specific information present on the NLSY79 main data file and on special data sources such as the work history and geocode main Youth files can be linked with the Child data by case ID.

Constructed Young Adult Variables. In addition to the questionnaire items from the Young Adult surveys, several constructed variables for Young Adults are available. Some of these created variables are available for all young adult respondents who were interviewed in any survey year (designated as XRND), while others are specific to a particular survey round. The Young Adult constructed variables are located in the Area of Interests called YA COMMON KEY VARIABLES and YA FERTILITY AND RELATIONSHIP DATA - CREATED. 

The following key variables are constructed for all young adults: young adult ID (Y00001.00, CASEID), date of birth, gender, race, the ID code of the mother, comprehensive biological child information, dates of first marriage and first cohabitation, as well as the following:

Y12051.00 LASTINTYR YEAR OF MOST RECENT YOUNG ADULT INTERVIEW
Y12052.00 NUMYAINTVS NUMBER OF YOUNG ADULT INTERVIEWS COMPLETED
Y12053.00 NUMCHASMTS NUMBER OF CHILD SURVEY YEARS WITH DATA FOR R AVAILABLE
Y12113.00 HGC_DLI HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED AS OF DATE OF LAST YA INTERVIEW
Y12121.00 HSTDEGREE_DLI HIGHEST ACADEMIC DEGREE RECEIVED AS OF DATE OF LAST YA INTERVIEW

Additionally, XRND flags for completing specific degrees, as well as the month and year the degrees were received, are available for all young adults.

Details about key variables: Two key identification codes are provided: that of the Young Adult and that of the mother. Any child who has not yet aged into the Young Adult sample, or who is ineligible for fielding, or who has been fielded but not interviewed, will have a missing value (-7) on these two ID variables. Only children who have ever been interviewed as Young Adults have valid values. These variables are provided for users who want to quickly restrict their sample to ever-interviewed Young Adults. The ever-interviewed Young Adults also have an updated date of birth (month and year), gender, and race based on mother's racial/ethnic cohort from the 1978 screener.

Beginning with the 2000 release, three interview status variables are provided. First is the year of most recent Young Adult survey (Y12051.). This variable allows users to quickly identify when data for a non-year-specific variable would have been pulled. For example, if a respondent was last interviewed in 1994, only information from that year would have been available to use in constructing variables such as ever cohabited or ever reported a first marriage. 

The second interview status variable is the number of Young Adult interviews completed by a respondent (Y12052.). This variable allows users to assess how many respondents have multiple time points for repeated measures. Users are reminded, however, that there are a variety of factors that influence a respondent's value on this variable, such as when the respondent aged into the sample, during what years there were age or other restrictions applied to the fielded sample, and whether or not the respondent was actually interviewed in a given year. There are two flags per survey year, located in the CHILD BACKGROUND area of interest, allowing the user to identify whether a respondent was eligible to be interviewed as a Young Adult and whether or not a Young Adult interview occurred.

The last of these interview status variables is the number of Child survey years where the respondent has at least some interview or assessment data available (Y12053.). Users should be aware that the Child survey consists of two or three instruments, depending on the age of the child, and some respondents may have data for only one of these instruments in a given survey year. This variable, as with the number of Young Adult interviews, is provided to help users gain a quick portrait of data availability. 

New Variables Created by Researchers. Researchers sometimes use the NLS public datasets to generate a new variable to use in their research. In some cases, researchers like to make that new variable publicly available (through their own data repository) so that it can be easily accessed for follow-up studies. This is permissible as long as researchers are using public NLS data (rather than restricted) and that they make it clear they are the author of the variable rather than the NLS team.

Question Names & Reference Numbers

Each NLSY79 child variable has a "question name" that helps to identify it in the data file and permits users to locate the original question in the questionnaire. Variables in the NLSY79 child data are generally named according to the source from which they are derived. Items from the Child, Mother, and Child Self-Administered supplements have question names linked to the location in the instrument. For example, "CS94-14" (HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?) comes from Q.14 asked in the first section of the Child Supplement in 1994. Acronyms are used to identify the scores derived from the child assessments administered at the time of the survey (e.g., BPI2002 for Behavior Problems Index-Raw Score, 2002). Mnemonic names identify constructed variables that are based on inputs taken from the main NLSY79 survey (e.g., AGEMOM2006 for Age of mother at interview date, 2006).

Through 1998, questions from the mother and child instruments are generally identified by "MS" for Mother Supplement or "CS" for Child Supplement and, starting in 2000, "CSAS" for the Child Self-Administered Supplement. The two digits that immediately follow this prefix refer to the year of the survey. Starting in 2000, question names for items from the child questionnaires generally indicate the topical section of the instrument from which each question was derived. For example, child question names beginning with "SCHL" come from the schooling section of the Child Supplement questionnaire; items prefixed with "HLTH" designate the child health questions in the supplement. The question name also indicates the order in which the question was administered within each section of a questionnaire. 

Constructed variables are usually named according to the topic of their content. The item called "FSTYRAFT" (C00052.00) in the CHILD BACKGROUND area of interest refers to the "first survey year of mother after the child's birth." Such items on NLSY79 mothers and their children are usually based on multiple inputs from the main youth and child survey instruments. Codebook entries for these items may include a reference to one or more main file reference number to give the user an example of the main Youth question on which the child-specific item is based. For example, in the PRE/POST NATAL CARE area of interest, the item PRE0009 (C03201.00) refers the user to R13284.00 in order to see the inputs to the variable that were extracted from the main Youth file.

Child Question Naming Conventions

Mother Supplement Question Names

From 1986-1996 question names for items in the Mother Supplement have the following three components: (1) "MS" to designate the source of the item, (2) a 2-digit number to indicate the year of the survey round, and (3) deck and column number, used to designate the physical location on a data punch card in the days of paper data input. For example, in the item listed below, MS960329, the "MS" indicates the Mother Supplement, the "92" means the item is from the 1992 survey, and "0329" shows that the item was in Deck 3, Column 29 in the booklet.

1992: MS920323 HOME PART B  (3-5 YRS): HOW OFTEN MOTHER READS TO CHILD
1994: MS940331 HOME PART B  (3-5 YRS): HOW OFTEN MOTHER READS TO CHILD
1996: MS960329 HOME PART B  (3-5 YRS): HOW OFTEN MOTHER READS TO CHILD

In 1998 a similar system was used in naming Mother Supplement questions except that section number and question numbers replace the deck and column numbers, which were no longer relevant. In the example below, MS981B01 means that this item is from the Mother Supplement, 1998, Section 1-B (the HOME), question 1.

MS981B01 HOME PART B  (3-5 YRS): HOW OFTEN MOTHER READS TO CHILD

In 2000 a new naming system was introduced that more closely parallels the conventions used for the main Youth and Young Adult surveys. As seen in the example below, questions from the Mother Supplement still use the MS designation as well as a reference to the section and item number within the section, but the question names do not indicate the year of the survey.

HOME-B01 HOME (AGE 3 YRS): HOW OFTEN MOTHER READS TO CHILD
MS1-A01 HOME (AGES 4-5 YRS): HOW OFTEN MOTHER READS TO CHILD

NOTE: In 2000 the HOME and Temperament items have different question naming conventions depending on the age of the child. Items for children under age 4 that were administered in the Child Supplement are named according to the name of the assessment (e.g., HOME-B01 above). HOME and Temperament questions for children age 4 and older appear in the Mother Supplement and are therefore prefixed with "MS" followed by the section and item number (MS1-A01 means Mother Supplement, Section 1-A, question 01). Notes have been entered into the codebook for these items to alert users to this change in 2000. In 2002, all these mother-report assessment items returned to the Mother Supplement, where they continue to be administered.

Question Names for the MS in the main Youth Questionnaire. Starting in 2006, to reduce the time burden on mothers, the Mother Supplement was fully integrated into the mother's main interview as part of the Fertility Section of the Youth questionnaire. The content and basic structure of the child-based Mother Supplement were preserved, but instead of administering separate questionnaires, one for each child, interviewers asked the Mother Supplement questions in a series of child-by-child "loops" as part of the mother's main interview. The Mother Supplement data items appear both in the main Youth file and as child-based items in the MOTHER SUPPLEMENT2006-current survey areas of interest in the Child file. While the Mother Supplement question names in the mother's main Youth documentation contain the same string used for those questions in recent years, Mother Supplement items in the Child file are now all prefixed with "MS."

For example, the item on Head Start enrollment for Child 01 and Child 02 in the mother's main Youth questionnaire is documented as follows in the mother's main Youth data record:

BKGN-12_MS1.01 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD 01 EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?
BKGN-12_MS1.02 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD 02 EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?

The child-based version of this same Mother Supplement variable is labeled as follows in the Child file:

MS-BKGN-12 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?

NOTE: In general, users of the Child data should access the "child-based" version of the Mother Supplement. Users of the Head Start data may be interested to know that mothers too were asked in 1994 if they attended Head Start.

Child Supplement (CS) Question Names

Through 1992, question names for items administered in the Child Supplement are constructed as follows: (1) "CS" to designate the Child Supplement, (2) a 2-digit number to indicate the year of the survey round, and (3) deck and column number, used to designate the physical location on a data punch card used in the early survey rounds. When CAPI was introduced in 1994, questions were no longer identified by deck and column but simply by item number.

1992: CS921746 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?
1994: CS94-14 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?
1996: CS96-14 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?
1998: CS98-14 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?

Starting in 2000, questions in the Child CAPI Supplement are generally identified by the section of the questionnaire. In the example that follows, BKGN stands for the Child Background section of the questionnaire:

BKGN-12 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?

NOTE: Starting in 2006, nearly all the child background questions were moved into the Mother Supplement, which was integrated into the mother's main Youth interview. So an item such as BKGN-12, now appears prefixed as "MS-BKGN-12."

MS-BKGN-12 CHILD BACKGROUND: HAS CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN HEAD START?
MS1-A01 HOME (AGES 4-5 YRS): HOW  OFTEN  MOTHER  READS  TO  CHILD

Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS) Question Names

Questions in the Child Self-Administered Supplement for children 10 and older are prefixed by "CS" until the 2000 survey when they begin with "CSAS." Through 1996, deck and column numbers were used to designate the question location in the CSAS booklet. The following example designates the year "96" and then deck "01", column "13" (pg. 3 of the paper booklet):

CS960113 CHILD SELF-ADMIN: GONE TO MOVIES WITH PARENTS IN LAST MONTH

In 1998, item numbers are used.

CS98001A CHILD SELF-ADMIN: GONE TO MOVIES WITH PARENTS IN LAST MONTH

Starting in 2000, the prefix CSAS designates that the item is from the Child Self-Administered Supplement and the item number corresponds to the actual question in the instrument:

CSAS001A CHILD SELF-ADMIN: GONE TO MOVIES WITH PARENTS IN LAST MONTH

Young Adult Question & Variable Names

Question names in the Young Adult surveys follow one of three general patterns. Individual items from the Young Adult CAPI questionnaire are usually prefixed by "Q" and the section number. The suffix generally indicates the order in which questions appear. Because questions asked in multiple rounds retain the same question name, many suffixes also include letters (e.g., Q4-31B). Thus, Q2-19 represents the following question (asked in each survey year) of the Family Background portion (Section 2) of the YA CAPI questionnaire:

Q2-19 IS THIS THE FIRST TIME R STOPPED LIVING WITH MOTHER?

In prior releases, questions from the Young Adult self-report booklet in 1994 and 1996 were prefixed with "YA" followed by the survey year, and then a designation of the deck and column number. In 1998, question names for these self-report items no longer incorporated the deck and column numbers and were simply named according to question number sequence in the booklet.

Since 2000, when the self-report questions were first incorporated into the self-report section of the YA CAPI questionnaire, they have been prefixed by "YASR":

YASR-67 EVER BEEN ON PROBATION?

In order to make the Self-Report data easier to search in Investigator, for the 2018 release, the questions from the YA Self-Report Booklets for 1994 to 1998 have been renamed to follow the naming conventions used since 2000. Any question that was in the YASRB and has remained in the CAPI questionnaire will now have the same question name across all rounds in which it was asked. Similarly, those questions only asked in the YASRB will have a CAPI-style name that allows users to easily identify these questions across the rounds in which they were asked.

Constructed variables on the Young Adult file are identified by mnemonic names related to their content. For example, the series of variables that identifies the type of residence in each survey round are named "RESTYPE" followed by a year designation.

1994 RESTYPE94 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
1996 RESTYPE96 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
1998 RESTYPE98 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2000 RESTYPE2000 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2002 RESTYPE2002 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2004 RESTYPE2004 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2006 RESTYPE2006 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2008 RESTYPE2008 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2010 RESTYPE2010 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2012 RESTYPE2012 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2014 RESTYPE2014 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2016 RESTYPE2016 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2018 RESTYPE2018 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED
2020 RESTYPE2020 TYPE OF RESIDENCE R LIVES IN - CONSTRUCTED

Child & Young Adult Reference Numbers

All variables on the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult files are assigned unique identifiers called reference numbers, which determine the relative position of each variable within the codebook. Users of the main Youth data will recognize these reference numbers as conceptually equivalent to the "R"/"T" numbers used in the NLSY79 main Youth documentation.

Reference numbers that start with "C" are used for data items on the Child file. The "C" numbers appear in each NLSY79 Child codebook entry and also form the basis of the variable names on the SAS and SPSS control cards that are generated by the extraction procedures on the data set.

Reference numbers for Young Adult variables are prefixed with the letter "Y." Decimals in the Young Adult reference numbers generally indicate that more than one variable has been derived from a single question. However, decimals may also appear in reference numbers when variables have been added to the file after the original public release. For example, these variables have been added to the 1994 YA data:

Y03840.12 IS CURRENT RESIDENCE URBAN OR RURAL?
Y03840.13 IS CURRENT RESIDENCE IN SMSA?
Y03565.01 REVISED YOUNG ADULT SAMPLING WEIGHT

 

Survey Instruments

Multiple field instruments, in both paper and computer-administered format, have been used to collect information from and about the NLSY79 children. These instruments are used to assess the children and to elicit reports about their health, aptitudes, achievement, attitudes, relationships and behaviors. A brief description of these instruments is presented below. For more detailed information, view the following topics at the bottom of this page: Child Survey Instrument Structure & Content and Young Adult Survey Instrument Structure & Content.

The Child Supplement (CS) was a questionnaire, administered in every survey year from 1986 to 2014 to each NLSY79 child eligible for interview. The CS was used by the interviewer to obtain permission from the mother, verify age and grade, measure the child's height and weight, complete the interviewer-administered assessments, and obtain reports from school-agers about their schoolwork, work for pay and religion. The Child Supplement was the key field instrument used by the interviewer to administer the child assessments directly to the child. It contained questions about school, directed to older kids, and a section where the interviewer could record any special conditions that might affect testing. The CS was also used by the interviewer to record observations about the child's home environment. From 1986-1992, the CS was administered on paper. Starting in 1994, the CS became a CAPI (computer administered personal interview) questionnaire.

A Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS), introduced in the 1988 survey and administered through 2014, contained questions about family interactions, attitudes, friends, and sensitive behaviors for children 10 and older. Initially a separate instrument, the CSAS was integrated into the Child Supplement in 2006.

A Mother Supplement (MS), administered from 1986 to 2016 to the mother for each child, contained mother-report assessments and questions about health, school, and family background. A limited number of questions about child health and school were asked in 2018, but no assessments were administered. Note: Starting with the R22-2006 survey, the Mother Supplement (MS) was integrated into the mother's main Youth questionnaire but still administered in its entirety for each child. Main youth questionnaires are available on the NLSY79 Questionnaires page; the Mother Supplement sections are also provided on the Child/YA Questionnaires page.

The Young Adult questionnaire is a CAPI instrument, first used in 1994, has been used to interview all NLSY79 children once they have reached the age of 15. Beginning in 2016, children ages 12 to 14 also complete the Young Adult questionnaire. Children age 14 answer the same questions as 15 and 16 year olds, whereas the children ages 12 and 13 answer far fewer questions, many of which were in either the Child Supplement or the Child Self-Administered Supplement. From 1994 to 1998, the Young Adult survey also included a paper supplement called the Young Adult Self-Report Booklet.  Beginning in 2000, the content of this instrument was modified and incorporated into the CAPI questionnaire. In the initial YA survey rounds, the questionnaire was modeled after the main Youth instrument but has since been revised, streamlined, and updated to reflect the content areas relevant to the activities and life stages of the young adult children.

Where to View the Questionnaires. Users are urged to examine the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult data collection instruments and relevant main NLSY79 Youth questionnaires in conjunction with the other documentation that accompanies the data files. Child and Young Adult questionnaires are available in PDF or HTML form on the Child/YA Questionnaires page; main youth questionnaires are available on the NLSY79 Questionnaires page. More detailed discussions of the content of each questionnaire and the mode of administration used in the current survey are provided the Interview Methods section.

Users also need to know how to find the specific question in the survey instruments that goes with a given variable in the data set. Information about linking the data to the questionnaires is provided in the Question Names & Reference Numbers section of this guide.

Child and Young Adult structure and content

Introduction

Each NLSY79 Child interview may have consisted of the administration of multiple field instruments.

The Child Supplement (CS), administered every survey round from 1986 to 2014, was designed for children age 4 and older (capped at age 14 beginning in 1994), eligible for one or more of the child assessments. The Child Supplement was designed primarily for items that involve interviewer contact with the child. The Child Supplement contained the interviewer-administered assessments and questions for school-agers on classroom activities, teacher practices, homework, work for pay, asthma, religion, and the interviewer home observations.

The Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS), administered every survey round from 1988 to 2014, contained questions about family interactions, attitudes, friends, and sensitive behaviors for children 10 years of age and older (capped at age 14 beginning in 1994).

The Mother Supplement (MS)a, dministered from 1986 to 2016 to the mother for each child (capped at age 14 beginning in 1994), contained mother-report assessments and questions about health, school, and family background.

Table 1 gives a detailed list of the contents of the child questionnaires used in the current survey round.

Table 1. NLSY79 Child Surveys: Instrumentation and Survey Content
Child Supplement (CS)* Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS)* Mother Supplement (MS)

Preliminaries: 
Age & DOB check/verification
Consent to assess/interview child (4 yrs+)
Enrollment & current grade (4-14 yrs)

Child Height/Weight Child Assessments (4 yrs+):
What I am Like (SPPC): 12-14 
Memory for Digit Span: 7-11 
PIAT Math: 5-14 
PIAT Reading Recognition: 5-14 
PIAT Reading Comprehension: 5-14 
PPVT: 4-5, 10-11

Interviewer Evaluation of Testing Conditions

Child Schooling (8-14 yrs):
Homework 
Classroom activities 
Teacher behavior/practices 
Parent assistance with homework/school plans

Asthma (10-14 yrs)

Work for Pay (10-14 yrs)

Religion (10-14 yrs)

Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS) (10-14 years)

Observations of Home Environment

Interviewer Remarks

After-School & Extracurricular Activities 
Alcohol, Cigarette, & Drug Use 
Anti-Social Behaviors 
Attitudes on Gender Roles 
Child "Moods" 
Child Task Expectations 
Childbearing Expectations 
Computer Access/Training/Use 
Dating 
Educational Expectations 
Friendship Network 
Interviewer Remarks 
Marriage Expectations 
Neighborhood Safety 
Parental Consensus 
Parent-Child Decision-Making 
Parent-Child Interaction 
Parent-Child Joint Activities 
Risk-taking Behavior 
Rules for Child Behavior 
School Satisfaction 
Sex Education 
Summer Activities 
Time Away from Parents 
TV Viewing 
Volunteerism (14 years old) 
Weapons at School

Child Background: 
Name, age verification 
School/preschool attendance 
Head Start 
Parent involvement 
Child religion

Child Health: 
Height/weight 
Limiting conditions 
Accidents/injuries/illnesses/hospitalization
Menarche 
Handedness 
Insurance

Mother-Report Assessments: 
The HOME 
How My Child Usually Acts (3-6 yrs) 
Motor & Social Development (0-3)

School & Family (5-14 yrs): 
Scholastic progress & difficulties 
Ratings of school effectiveness 
Expectations for child education 
Child social relationships

Behavior Problems Index (4-14 yrs)

Child Mental Health (0-14; 4-14 yrs)  

*NOTE: In every survey round from 1986 to 2014, a Child Supplement and a Mother Supplement were administered for each eligible child. In 2016, only the Mother Supplement was administered. In 2018, a limited number of child health and schooling questions were asked, but no Mother Supplement assessments were administered. Starting in 2006, the Mother Supplement was fully integrated into the main Youth questionnaire and the CSAS, previously a separate questionnaire, became a section of the Child Supplement. CS and MS sections not otherwise labeled are intended for all children ages 0-14. Sensitive items are self-administered.

Most of the primary variables found in the child data set were derived directly from one or more survey instruments, e.g., questionnaires or other interview forms. Constructed variables on the Child file that are not based directly on the Child assessments (e.g., pre- and postnatal care, child care, or maternal employment) are derived from information reported by the mothers during their own main NLSY79 Youth interviews. 

Users are urged to examine the NLSY79 Child data collection instruments and relevant main NLSY79 Youth questionnaires in conjunction with the other documentation that accompanies the data files. Online documentation for these questionnaires is available under "Questionnaires" in the Other Documentation section and in the Survey Instruments section. Details on the content of each questionnaire and the mode of administration used in prior survey rounds, as well as the current survey, are discussed below.

Prior Rounds. The Child data collection instruments have undergone changes, some of which are documented in this and other users guides from prior rounds as well as in the NLSY Child Handbook:1986-1990, part 1 and part 2 (Baker et al., 1993, PDF). From 1986-1992, separate paper instruments were used to collect interview and assessment information for each NLSY79 Child. A Child Supplement (CS) was the interviewer-administered assessment questionnaire. A Mother Supplement (MS) was given to mothers so they could report assessment information about each child. In 1988 a third questionnaire, the Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS) was introduced to collect self-reports from each child age 10 years or older (capped at age 14 beginning in 1994).

CHILD SUPPLEMENT 1994. In 1994 the Child Supplement was converted to Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI), while the MS and CSAS remained in paper format.

CHILD SUPPLEMENT 2000. In 2000 all items in the Mother Supplement for children under age four were moved to the Child CAPI Supplement. Some sections on school and family that had previously been in the Mother Supplement were transferred to the Child Supplement for CAPI administration. The Child Self-Administered Supplement used in 2000 was still a confidential paper self-report aimed at children ages 10-14.

CHILD SUPPLEMENT 2002. In the 2002 survey round, each child interview involved the administration of one Child Supplement (CS), a Mother Supplement (MS) and, for children age 10-14, a Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS). In the 2002 survey, the Child Supplement was essentially reserved for items that involved interviewer contact with the child. The 2002 Child Supplement focused on the interviewer-administered assessments and questions for school-agers on classroom activities, teacher practices, homework, work for pay, and religion. Starting in 2002, all items that had been traditionally addressed to the mother, such as schooling, health, and family background were moved into the Mother Supplement, which became a CAPI instrument for the first time. In 2002, the Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS) was converted from paper to CAPI and given to children who were age 10-14 by December 31 of that survey year. The CSAS was made available both on laptop and on hand-held PDA (Personal Data Assistant) in 2002.

CHILD SUPPLEMENT 2004. In the 2004 survey round, each child interview involved the administration of one Child Supplement, one Mother Supplement and, for children age 10-14, a Child Self-Administered Supplement. In the 2004 survey, the Child Supplement was essentially reserved for items that involved interviewer contact with the child. The 2004 Child Supplement focused on the interviewer-administered assessments and questions for school-agers on classroom activities, teacher practices, homework, work for pay, and religion. In 2004 all items that had been traditionally addressed to the mother, such as schooling, health, and family background, were moved into the Mother Supplement, which became a CAPI instrument for the first time. In 2004 the Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS) was converted from paper to CAPI and given to children who were age 10-14 by December 31, 2004. The CSAS was made available both on laptop and on hand-held PDA (Personal Data Assistant).

CHILD SUPPLEMENT & MOTHER SUPPLEMENT 2006. In the 2006 survey round, the Mother Supplement was folded into the mother's main Youth questionnaire and the Child Self-Administered Supplement became a section of the Child Supplement. So, while the MS and CSAS content were preserved, in 2006 they were no longer separate instruments.

MOTHER SUPPLEMENT 2016. In the 2016 survey round, the Child Supplement and Child Self-Administered Supplement were not administered. Mothers completed the Mother Supplement for children ages 14 and below. Mothers answered only the child background questions for 14 year olds; age-relevant assessments, health, and family questions were answered for children ages 13 and younger. More detail is provided in the Mother Supplement (MS) section below.

Child Supplement (CS)

For survey rounds from 1986 to 2014, the Child Supplement (CS) was used by the interviewer to:

  1. verify age and grade of the child
  2. weigh and measure the child
  3. give children the interviewer-administered cognitive and socio-emotional assessments
  4. obtain information about the child's current school experience
  5. evaluate the testing conditions
  6. record observations of the child's home environment

Tables 2a and 2b display the contents of the CS for the 2014 survey round, how the section was administered, and the age at which a child was eligible for each section.

Table 2a. Child Supplement - Administration Pattern by Age of Child (Preliminaries Age Check through PPVT) as of 2014
Section Name: Preliminaries Age Check Consent, Grade Child Hgt & Wgt What I Am Like (SPPC) Digit Span PIATs PPVT
Age Range 4-14 yrs 4-14 yrs 4-14 yrs 12-14 yrs 7-11 yrs 5-14 yrs 4-5, 10-11 yrs1
Age 4 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - - - FI asks child
5 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - - FI asks child FI asks child
6 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - - FI asks child FI asks child1
7 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - FI asks child FI asks child FI asks child1
8 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - FI asks child FI asks child FI asks child1
9 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - FI asks child FI asks child FI asks child1
10 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - FI asks child FI asks child FI asks child
11 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom - FI asks child FI asks child FI asks child
12 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom FI asks child - FI asks child -
13 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom FI asks child - FI asks child -
14 FI asks mom FI asks mom FI measures or asks mom FI asks child - FI asks child -
1 Some children 6 to 9 years of age with no previous score were administered the PPVT in some survey rounds.  
Table 2b. Child Supplement - Administration Pattern by Age of Child (Evaluation of Testing Conditions through Interviewer Remarks) as of 2014
Section Name: Evaluation of Testing Conditions
 
Child Schooling
 
Asthma, Work for Pay & Religion
 
CSAS (self-report)
 
HOME Observations
 
Interviewer Remarks
 
Age Range 4-14 yrs 8-14 yrs 10-14 yrs 10-14 yrs2 4-14 yrs 4-14 yrs
Age 4 FI only - - - FI only FI only
5 FI only - - - FI only FI only
6 FI only - - - FI only FI only
7 FI only - - - FI only FI only
8 FI only FI asks child - - FI only FI only
9 FI only FI asks child - Child self reports2 FI only FI only
10 FI only FI asks child FI asks child Child self reports FI only FI only
11 FI only FI asks child FI asks child Child self reports FI only FI only
12 FI only FI asks child FI asks child Child self reports FI only FI only
13 FI only FI asks child FI asks child Child self reports FI only FI only
14 FI only FI asks child FI asks child Child self reports FI only FI only
2 Some children 9 years of age at the date of interview (10 years as of Dec 31) completed an abbreviated CSAS.

The Child Supplement began with questions addressed to the mother on the child's current grade, enrollment status, and height and weight. The interviewer administered the following sections to the mother before starting any child assessments:

Preliminaries -- short introduction in which the interviewer verified the name and age of the child to be interviewed and the mode in which the questionnaire was to be administered (in-person or telephone).

Consent/grade --  the interviewer verified parental permission to interview the child and asked about the child's current grade in school. Grade was used to determine a good estimated entry point into the PIAT assessments.

Child Height and Weight -- height and weight were collected either by mother report or interviewer measurement.

The interviewer then administered the following assessments directly to children age 4 and older:

Interviewer-Administered Child Assessments -- What I am Like (SPPC) for children age 12-14; Memory for Digit Span for children 7-11; PIAT Math and Reading subtests for children 5 and older; and the PPVT-R administered to children 4-5, and 10-11.

All interviewer-administered assessments were completed using CAPI software, a process that was introduced into the surveys in 1994. The software presented the interviewer with on-screen facsimiles of the assessment items, stored each response that was entered, and then automatically scored the test. Original materials prepared by the test designers for PIAT Math and Reading Recognition were presented to the child. The PIAT Reading Comprehension and the PPVT were presented to the child on-screen. Each assessment was followed by a series of check items in which the testing conditions were evaluated by the interviewer.

After the interviewer-administered assessments were completed, the following sections on school, work, asthma and religion were administered to older children:

Child Schooling (age 8-14) -- questions addressed to school age children about reading, homework, classroom activities, and their perception of parental involvement in school.

Work for Pay (age 10-14) -- a brief series on type of work for pay, frequency, and earnings.

Asthma (age 10-14) -- questions on any asthma symptoms in the last month; type of symptoms and their effect on schoolwork and physical activity.

The Child Supplement concluded with interviewer reports on the child's testing environment and a checklist of conditions observed in the home. 

Interviewer Evaluation of Testing -- interviewer reports used to gauge the attitude of the child toward testing, the child's general physical condition, and whether there were any events that interfered with assessment or caused premature termination of the session.

Interviewer Observations of the Home Environment -- interviewer perceptions of the child-mother interaction and the nature of the child's physical surroundings. Most of the items that comprise the HOME scales are in the mother-report assessment section of the Mother Supplement. However, selected interviewer observations of the home environment (found in the CS) were used in scoring the HOME assessment.

The Child CAPI Supplement flowchart illustrates the sequence in which a case proceeds through the current questionnaire according to the age of the child.

Changes to the Child Supplement (CS). In 2002 virtually all the child background questions that appeared in previous survey rounds in the beginning of the CS (directed to the mother) were moved to the Mother Supplement. This design was also used in 2004 and subsequent survey rounds.

Changes to the Assessments: Starting in 2002, two of the original printed assessment easels were no longer displayed to the child in the administration of the PPVT or PIAT Reading Comprehension. The child viewed the PPVT images on the laptop while the interviewer followed along using a printed word list. PIAT Reading Comprehension subtest was also displayed on-screen to the child while the interviewer still used the assessment materials in the standard manner. All assessments, including the PPVT, were administered only in English starting in 2002. Interviewers were instructed to make comments in the assessments or interviewer remarks section if other languages were used in the interview to facilitate understanding.

Child Schooling raised to age 8: Starting in 2002, questions about the child's most recent classroom experiences and homework were directed to children 8 and older. Before that survey round this series was administered for children age 5 and older.

Religion & Work for pay moved from CSAS: Questions about religious affiliation and jobs that were self-reported in the Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS) for children 10-14 prior to 2002 were administered by the interviewer in the Child Supplement beginning in 2002.

The Child Supplement was not administered in 2016. The Child Supplement questionnaires for previous rounds are available under Questionnaires in the Other Documentation section.

Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS)

The Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS), administered from 1988 to 2014, has been used to collect information from children ages 10 years and older on a wide range of topics including child-parent interactions, family decision-making, attitudes toward school, extra-curricular activities, work for pay, peer relationships, dating activities, attendance at religious services, antisocial behavior, and substance use. 

In booklet form until 2002, this self-report series was administered on laptop (and on PDA in 2002 and 2004) by children who are 10 to 14 years old by the end of the survey year. The CSAS collected information on:

  1. child-parent interactions
  2. family decision-making
  3. attitudes toward school
  4. after school and extra-curricular activities
  5. jobs and employment
  6. peer relationships and dating activities
  7. religious identification and attendance at religious services
  8. birth and marriage expectations
  9. sex education
  10. participation in various delinquent activities
  11. use of cigarettes, alcohol, and other illegal substances
  12. risk taking and depression
  13. computer use

Through 2000 children age 13 and older were asked about age at first intercourse. Once children reach the Young Adult survey they are asked questions about sexual activity. See Table 1 at the beginning of this section for details on the content of the CSAS as of the 2014 survey round.

Changes in the CSAS. The content of this supplement has gradually expanded since 1988, the first survey year that it was used. In 1992, the following items and topics were added to the Child Self-Administered Supplement: 

  1. dates of birth and usual residence of any children born to the NLSY79 children age 13 or older
  2. expanded categories on the decision-making questions
  3. parent interaction
  4. parent-child closeness
  5. depression
  6. peer pressure
  7. school rating
  8. neighborhood safety

In 1994, with the introduction of the Young Adult survey, the CSAS was limited to children ages 10-14. In that same year, a sequence of questions was added regarding the nature of parent interactions on issues relating to the child. A seven-item series was added that probes into the child's ideas about appropriate roles for boys and girls in the family, with peers, and in school. Also included for the first time in 1994 was a sequence on risk-taking. The substance use series was substantially augmented by the addition of in-depth questions about current use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and a variety of other drugs. A series of questions about computer use and programming knowledge was also introduced in 1994. The only significant change since 1996 was an expansion, in 1998, of the sequence of questions relating to substance use.

A CSAS confidential report form was used from 1988 to 2000 to collect information on early sexual activity for children 13 and older. In 2000 the questions on the CSAS confidential card about live births were eliminated since this information is now collected as the children become young adults. Starting in 2002, questions about early sexual activity are no longer administered to children under age 15. The following questions, which were asked in the 1988-2000 surveys of children ages 13 and 14, were deleted from subsequent Child survey rounds:

CSASCC2A       Have you ever had sexual intercourse? ("had sex", "made it", etc.)
CSASCC2A       What grade were you in when you first had sexual intercourse? 
CSASCC2B       How old were you when you first had sexual intercourse? 
NOTE: These questions are also asked of young adult children once they become eligible for the Young Adult interview.

CSAS on PDA.  In 2002 and 2004 the Child Self-Administered Supplement was available on a hand-held personal data assistant (PDA) and on laptop. In those survey rounds children were encouraged to complete the CSAS on PDA while the interviewer continued other parts of the interview either with the mother or siblings on the laptop. If only one child age 10-14 was in the household or the laptop was not being used, that child could complete the CSAS on laptop as soon as the assessments were completed. A question was added in 2002 and repeated in 2004 on the extent of the child's previous experience using any type of hand-held digital device.

User Note: In the survey years in which the CSAS was a separate CAPI questionnaire, it was necessary to determine ahead of time which children would take the CSAS. Thus, all children who might turn 10 during the field period were identified as eligible for the CSAS. This means that some children who were age 9 at the time of the interview, but who would turn 10 by the end of the year, were eligible to start the CSAS and complete a short mini series once their age at the date of interview was established.

The CSAS was not administered in 2016. The CSAS section for prior rounds is included in the Child Supplement questionnaire, available under Questionnaires in the Other Documentation section.

Mother Supplement (MS)

Table 3 describes the current content of the Mother Supplement and the age at which each child is eligible for a particular section.

Table 3. Mother Supplement - Administration Pattern by Age of Child in 2016
Section Name Child Background Health Motor & Social Development How My Child Acts (Temperament) The HOME School & Family Behavior Problems Child Mental Health
Age Range 0-14 yrs 0-13  yrs 0-3 yrs 3-6 yrs 0-13 yrs 5-13 yrs 4-13 yrs 0-14 yrs
Age <1 * * *   *     *
1 * * *   *     *
2 * * *   *     *
3 * * * * *     *
4 * *   * *   * *
5 * *   * * * * *
6 * *   * * * * *
7 * *     * * * *
8 * *     * * * *
9 * *     * * * *
10 * *     * * * *
11 * *     * * * *
12 * *     * * * *
13 * *     * * * *
14 * *     * * * *
Note that in survey rounds prior to 2016, the upper age limit for the Mother Supplement was 14.

The Mother Supplement began with an introduction to obtain information about each child's schooling, religious attendance, and health. The interviewer asked about the child's home environment and temperament and then turned the laptop over to the mother so she could complete a self-administered section on her child's school progress, behavior problems, and mental health. Designed to be completed by the mother or guardian for each child, the Mother Supplement contained the following sections:

Child Background - Questions on school attendance, Head Start, teacher behavior and classroom activities, parental involvement in school, child's religious attendance, and the importance of religion. In prior survey rounds, mothers also completed a series on the child’s progress in school and ratings of school quality.

Child Health - Mother reports on the child's general health status, accidents and injuries, illnesses, menarche (age at first menses) update, handedness, insurance coverage, mental health.

Mother report assessments - The HOME for children ages 0 to 13; Behavior Problems Index for children 4-13; Temperament or "How My Child Acts" for children ages 2 to 6; and Motor & Social Development for children under age 4.

CASI section - Mother reports on educational expectations; child's friendships; child's closeness to mother and siblings; child's future prospects; child's mental health.

The Mother Supplement flowchart (PDF) depicts the general content and pathways of the Mother Supplement.

Changes to the Mother Supplement. From 1986-2002 the Mother Supplement (MS) was a paper booklet, self-administered by the mother. In 2000, assessments for children under age 4 years were moved out of the MS into the CS for that survey round only. In 2004, the paper-and-pencil Mother Supplement was converted to a CAPI instrument. Questions about child school attendance and Head Start that were previously addressed to the mother at the beginning of the Child Supplement (CS) were moved into the Child Background section of the Mother Supplement. The MS Child Health section then contained the series about limiting conditions, accidents, and injuries that used to be in the Child Supplement. School and family background questions, which were once in the paper Mother Supplement and then in the Child CAPI Supplement, were moved into the CAPI Mother Supplement. 

Three mother-report assessments, that were previously self-report, were (starting in 2004) administered to the mother by the interviewer:

  1. The HOME
  2. How My Child Usually Acts (Temperament)
  3. Motor and Social Development

While most of the Mother Supplement questions were asked by the interviewer, in early CAPI rounds (prior to the integration of the Mother Supplement into the mother's main Youth interview in 2006), mothers used CASI to self-administer a series of sensitive questions about each child's school progress, school rating, class standing, and educational expectations. Note that only the question about educational expectations was asked in 2016. Mothers also reported on each child's problem behaviors by completing the Behavior Problems Index (BPI) in the CASI section. Some confidential health questions, previously in the CS, were later administered in a brief MS section called Mental Health when reporting about children 4 and older.

Three questions on the following topics were added to the School & Family section of the Mother Supplement in 1992: rating of child's current school, rating of the child's general well-being and prospects, and degree of parent knowledge about child's friends. These questions are now completed by mothers for all their children of school age. In 1996 and thereafter the minimum child age for these schooling questions was lowered from age 10 to 5 years.

In 2006, the entire Mother Supplement was integrated into the mother's main Youth Questionnaire. This change meant that the items in the MS were administered in their entirety for each child as a series of "child-by-child loops" in the main Youth questionnaire. A second implication of this change is that the date of the MS assessments may have differed significantly from the date the interviewer-administered child assessments took place, in the Child Supplement.

Mother Supplement in Recent Survey Rounds. The child-based Mother Supplement section of the main NLSY79 questionnaire is available under Questionnaires on the child documentation main menu. Users who would like to view the mother supplement in the context of the full NLSY79 survey instrument can access the NLSY79 main Youth questionnaire through the NLSY79 documentation page.

When the Young Adult survey was first designed for the 1994 survey round, many of the CAPI sections exactly paralleled those administered to the main NLSY79 respondents. Other sections of the questionnaire were tailored for this cohort. One important part of the design process was to review the 1979 NLSY79 questionnaire to consider where Young Adults could be asked questions that were essentially the same as those that had been asked of their mothers in their first survey round. Other years of the NLSY79 were also reviewed for questions to include. The Young Adult questionnaire remained fairly stable as an instrument through the 1998 fielding, with changes in parallel sections mirroring those in the NLSY79 Youth.

The Young Adult survey instrument underwent a major redesign in 2000 and differs in a variety of important ways not only from the main Youth questionnaire, but also from the previous Young Adult instruments. The questionnaire was streamlined and adjusted for telephone administration, so that most interviews could be undertaken in less than one hour. Additionally, more pre-existing information was incorporated into information sheets to determine branching for each respondent’s path through the questionnaire. Branching also occurred throughout the questionnaire based on answers provided by the respondent. Many of the items that are comparable across the main Youth and the Young Adult were retained. Although not a complete listing of these items, Table 1 below provides users with a listing of attitudinal and behavioral sequences in the Young Adult and indicates where comparable data can be found for the mothers.

The 2002 survey instrument remained very similar to the 2000 questionnaire while incorporating questions directed to the younger Young Adults that paralleled questions they had been asked in the Child Survey when they were 10 to 14 years old. Questions concerning weapons in school were also added.

Prior to the 2004 fielding, we assessed the viability of changes made in 2000 and 2002 and questioned if there were additional needs. The redesign for 2004 focused on improving data collected on fertility and relationships, which have become increasingly important as this cohort ages, as well as enlarging the scope of health-related data.

For the 2006 fielding, we again assessed the changes we had made in the questionnaire for 2004 as well as incorporating additional questions to expand the range of data we collect. New questions were included to ascertain biological relatedness among the young adult's siblings in the Child database. We also added questions about catastrophic events, assets and debts, and the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. The 2006 questionnaire also included a series of political questions, funded through the American National Election Survey (ANES) with a grant from the National Institute of Health.

Prior to the 2008 fielding, the Young Adult survey instrument once again underwent a major re-evaluation and redesign. This redesign focused on social psychological issues, job characteristics, and military service, as well as on parenting for both residential and nonresidential children, maternity leave, and relationships.

The redesign for the YA2010 survey round included bringing forward information on household members as well as current jobs from the date of last interview, as well as an expansion of questions concerning financial difficulties, perceived fairness in relationships, and gender role item. Questions about the height and weight of biological children were added. Additionally, a health module for older Young Adults was started in 2010. For 2010 and 2012, this module was asked of all respondents age 29 or older.

The YA2012 survey round included questions about perceived discrimination. One series, asked of those 21 and older, is about major instances of discrimination. A second, answered by all respondents, asks about day-to-day discrimination. The discrimination questions were asked in 2014 to those respondents who did not participate in the 2012 survey round. In 2016, these discrimination items were again asked of all respondents.

Other additions made in the YA2012 redesign include adding head injury questions to the extended health module, adding childhood adversity items for respondents age 21 and over, and the addition of the Behavior Problems Index (BPI) to the questions asked of respondents about the children in their household. The childhood adversity items will continue to be asked of YAs as they reach 21 or if they have not yet answered them.

As part of the redesign of the YA2014 questionnaire, the answer categories for the questions concerning grade currently attending/highest grade attended and highest grade completed were changed. Everyone who was interviewed in 2014, whether or not they were either currently attending or had attended school since the date of last interview, was asked these questions with the new categories. In future rounds, any YA who has not yet answered these questions with the new categories will be asked them whether or not the YA is either currently attending or has attended school since the date of last interview. The migration questions were modified to more closely parallel those asked of the mothers in the NLSY79 survey. Additionally, a new module for self-employment based on a subset of questions from the NLSY79 was added.

In 2012 and 2014, a subset of Young Adult respondents took both the TIPI and the mini-IPIP, a 20-item short form of the 50-item International Personality Item Pool-Five-Factor Model measure. This allows researchers to assess how closely these two measures of the Big 5 Personality Factors converge.

Much of the redesign for the YA2016 focused on adjusting response categories based on "other specify" responses as well as response patterns across rounds. Another focus of the redesign was to accommodate the addition of 12 and 13 years olds into the YA fielding, as the Child Supplement is no longer being fielded. The 12 and 13 year olds answer far fewer questions, and many of the added questions are from the Child Supplement and are asked only of the 12 and 13 year olds.

Also part of the YA2016 redesign was a review and updating of the examples given in our drug use items, as well as the addition of questions about electronic cigarettes, synthetic marijuana, and narcotics/opioids.

The redesign of the YA2018 focused on streamlining and shortening the existing questionnaire to facilitate the addition of new survey questions about loneliness and social isolation, as well questions about sexual orientation and gender identity. The YA2018 also included the General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Developed by Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams and Lowe, the GAD-7 asks respondents how often they have experienced certain feelings associated with anxiety in the past two weeks. The survey included questions about the health and well-being of their parents as perceived by the Young Adult respondents.

The redesign of YA2020 questionnaire included the addition of the six-item Brief Resilience Scale asked of everyone as well as a series of questions about perimenopause and menopause asked of women over age 30. The advent of the Coronavirus pandemic, however, led to the development and inclusion of a variety of questions to assess the impact of the pandemic on the lives of the YA respondents. Questions were added to assess this impact on employment, income and assets, health, family, and children’s schooling. Additionally, all respondents were re-asked the General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), so that there is a pre-Covid and post-Covid anxiety measure for respondents interviewed in both 2018 and 2020.

Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Table 1. Selected Attitudinal/Behavioral Sequences Available for Young Adults and for Mothers
Question Sequence Mothers YA 1994-1998 YA 2000-2004 YA 2006-present
Attitudinal
  Job Satisfaction X X X X
  Fertility Desires/Expectations X X X X
  Educational Desires/Expectations X X X X
  Career Expectations X (Women) X X X
  Marriage Expectations X X X X
  Pregnancy "Wantedness" x X X X
  Women's Roles Scores X X X X
  Relationship Quality X X X X
  Locus of Control Rotter, Pearlin Pearlin Pearlin Pearlin
  Rosenberg Self-Esteem X X X X
  Depression Scale (CES-D) X X X X
  Anxiety Scale (GAD-7) X (2018)     X (2018, 2020)
  Brief Resiliency Scale (BRS) X (2018, 2020)     X (2020)
  Ten-Item Personality Inventory X     X
  Schieman Anger Scale       X (08 onward)
  Political Beliefs X     X (06 & 08 only)
Behavioral
  Religion X X X X
  Voting and Political Participation X     X (06 & 08 only)
  Police Contact X X X X
  Delinquency X X X X
  School Discipline X X X X
Alcohol
  Ever/Age First X X X X
  Frequency/Intensity X X X X
  Location X X    
Marijuana
  Age first/last X X/Recency X/Recency X/Recency
  Workplace Use     X X
  Dependency     X X
  Lifetime frequency X X    
  30 day frequency X X X X
Amphetamines
  Ever/Recency/Workplace Use     X X
Cocaine ("Crack" separate in 92, 94)   (separately) (separately) (separately)
  Age first/last X X/Recency X/Recency X/Recency
  30 day frequency X X X  
  Lifetime frequency X X    
"Other" Drugs (laundry list) (more detail) (more detail) (more detail)
  Ever X X X X
  Lifetime frequency X X    
  Age first/last X X/Recency X/Recency X/Recency
  30 day frequency X X X X
Cigarettes
  Ever X X X  
  Age first/last X X/Recency X/Recency X/Recency
  Frequency /Intensity X X X X
Note:  Pearlin = Pearlin Mastery Scale and CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale

Within the Topical Guide to the Data, users can find information about the contents of each section of the Young Adult survey instrument as well as changes that have occurred within each section over time. To understand the survey flow fully, users are encouraged to consult the HTML version of the CAPI questionnaire in the Questionnaires section.

Generally speaking, the CAPI data that are released are largely unedited. Exceptions to this pattern are discussed in the relevant sections. Users should note that all the names of the areas of interest for Young Adult data are preceded by "YA." Although many of the areas of interest are almost identical to the section names in the questionnaire, there are exceptions to this pattern. Table 2 provides a summary of the areas of interest in the order in which they appear in the extraction software and a description of their contents.

Scroll right to view additional table columns.

 
Table 2. Young Adult Areas of Interest
Area of Interest Description
YA ATTITUDES Data from Section 16 for 1994-present
YA BETWEEN JOBS Data from Section 8 (Gaps) for 1994-1998
YA BIRTH RECORD 1994 Data from the 1994 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 1996 Data from the 1996 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 1998 Data from the 1998 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2000 Data from the 2000 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2002 Data from the 2002 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2004 Data from the 2004 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2006 Data from the 2006 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2008 Data from the 2008 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2010 Data from the 2010 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2012 Data from the 2012 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2014 Data from the 2014 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2016 Data from the 2016 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2018 Data from the 2018 fertility section (Section 12)
YA BIRTH RECORD 2020 Data from the 2020 fertility section (Section 12)
YA CHILD CARE Data from Section 13 for 1994-present
YA CHILDREN IN THE HOUSEHOLD Data from Section 13 for 2020
YA COMMON KEY VARIABLES Commonly used variables from all YA years as well as constructed summary 
variables
YA CPS Data from Section 6 (CPS) for 1994-98
YA DATING AND MARRIAGE Data from Section 3 for 1994-present
YA FAMILY BACKGROUND Data from Section 2 for 1994-present
YA FERTILITY AND RELATIONSHIP 
DATA - CREATED
Cleaned variables relating to biological children, marriage and cohabitation
YA FIRST JOB AFTER HIGH SCHOOL Data from Section 10 for 1994-present
YA GEOCODE 1994 Constructed geocode variables for 1994 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 1996 Constructed geocode variables for 1996 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 1998 Constructed geocode variables for 1998 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2000 Constructed geocode variables for 2000 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2002 Constructed geocode variables for 2002 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2004 Constructed geocode variables for 2004 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2006 Constructed geocode variables for 2006 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2008 Constructed geocode variables for 2008 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2010 Constructed geocode variables for 2010 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2012 Constructed geocode variables for 2012 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2014 Constructed geocode variables for 2014 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2016 Constructed geocode variables for 2016 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2018 Constructed geocode variables for 2018 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA GEOCODE 2020 Constructed geocode variables for 2020 (Available only on Geocode release)
YA HEALTH Data from Section 14 for 1994-present
YA HOUSEHOLD RECORD Final (cleaned) household rosters and selected items from Section 1 for 1994-present
YA INCOME Data from Section 15 for 1994-present
YA INTERVIEWER REMARKS Selected data from the Interviewer Remarks Section for 1994-present
YA JOB INFORMATION Data on job characteristics collected in the Employer Supplements for 1994-present 
and Section 7 for 2000-present
YA JOBS Basic job data collected in Section 7 for 1994-1998
YA LAST JOB Data from Section 9 for 1994-present
YA MILITARY Data from Section 5 for 1994-present
YA SCHOOL Data from Section 4 for 1994-present
YA SELF REPORT Data from the YASRB for 1994-1998 and the YASR section for 2000-present
YA TRAINING Data from Section 11 for 1994-present

Fielding History and Sample Issues

Child Survey

Interview Dates. During the NLSY79 survey rounds in which multiple Child instruments were used, the child instruments were not always fielded on a single date.  For example, from 1986-2004, interviewers assigned to assess two or more children in a single family might ask the mother to complete one or more Mother Supplements (one MS for each child) on the first visit to the home. On that first visit the interviewer might complete one Child Supplement (CS) and one Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS), scheduling the remaining Child Supplements for all children until the next visit on a subsequent day. Even when the CSAS was folded into the Child Supplement in 2006, it was possible for a child to complete most of the CS (including the assessments) on one date, and then complete the CSAS section later. Starting in 2006, when the Mother Supplement was first integrated into the mothers' main interview, the date of the Mother supplement became the same as the mother's date of interview (DOI), since the mother's main Youth interview was generally completed in one session.

Fielding Periods. Historically, the field period of the NLSY79 Child and Young Adult data collection generally coincided with the main Youth. However, starting in 2002, main Youth and Young Adult telephone interviewing began substantially prior to the younger child interviews. While this fielding strategy had a positive impact on overall completion rates, it potentially widened the gap between the mother's interview and the assessments administered to her children later in the year. Fielding of the Child typically occurred over a period of about six months from late May through November or later. In some survey rounds a small number of cases were actually completed in the calendar year following the survey year.

As indicated in Table 1, child fielding has generally occurred over periods of approximately 6-9 months in each survey round; the young adult field period generally lasted somewhat longer. Until 2004, data collection was completed within the calendar year of the particular survey round. In 2004, child interviews were conducted June-December, with 15 cases completed in January-February 2005. In R22-2006, child interviews were conducted March-December, with 33 cases completed in January-February 2007. In R23-2008, nearly all child interviews were conducted April-December 2008, with 19 cases completed in January-February of 2009. In R24-2010, nearly all child interviews were conducted March-December 2010, with an additional two cases completed in January of 2011. In R25-2012, child interviews were conducted November 2012-August 2013, with more than half the cases completed in 2013. In R26-2014, all of the child interviews took place in 2015. R26-2014 was the last round of fielding for the Child as far as direct interviewing of the children; however, in R27-2016 mothers still completed Mother Supplements for children ages 0 to 13. In R28-2018, no Mother Supplement assessments were administered, but mothers answered a small number of child health and schooling questions for children aged 18 and younger.

Table 1. NLSY79 Child and Young Adult Surveys: Fielding Periods

Year Child fielding period Young Adult fielding period
1986 February 1986 - July 1986  
1988 June 1988 - December 1988  
1990 June 1990 - December 1990  
1992 May 1992 - December 1992  
1994 June 1994 - December 1994 June 1994 - December 1994
1996 April 1996 - November 1996 May 1996 - October 1996
1998 March 1998 - October 1998 March 1998 - September 1998
2000 May 2000 - January 2001 March 2000 - January 2001
2002 May 2002 - November 2002 January 2002 - December 2002
2004 June 2004 - February 2005 January 2004 - February 2005
2006 May 2006 - March 2007 January 2006 - March 2007
2008 April 2008 - February 2009 January 2008 - March 2009
2010 March 2010 - January 2011 December 2009 - January 2011
2012 November 2012 - August 2013 August 2012 - September 2013
2014 February 2015 - October 2015 October 2014 - October 2015
2016 N/A (last round of direct fielding of Child was 2014) October 2016 - November 2017
2018 N/A October 2018 - November 2019
2020 N/A September 2020 - December 2021

Important information

Information on fielding (interview) dates specific to each survey round can be found in the year-specific CHILD SUPPLEMENT, CHILD SELF-ADMINISTERED SUPPLEMENT and MOTHER SUPPLEMENT areas of interest.

In 1986 and 2006-present the titles for date of interview are as follows:

  • CHILD SUPPLEMENT DATE OF INTERVIEW
  • MOTHER SUPPLEMENT DATE OF INTERVIEW

In all other years these items are described with the following titles:

  • CHILD SUPPLEMENT INTERVIEW DATE
  • MOTHER SUPPLEMENT INTERVIEW DATE

Changes in the Child Assessments

Over time there have been changes in the administration of various assessments in the Child surveys. Details on changes in the content, administration, or scoring of particular assessments are discussed in the appropriate assessment-specific sections of this users guide (see The Child Assessments: Introduction for an overview). Two assessments, Memory for Location and Body Parts, were administered in 1986 and 1988, but have since been deleted from the data collection effort due to funding constraints. However, the 1986 and 1988 individual items and scores for these two assessments remain in the data file and are available to users.

Not all assessments were fielded in each child survey year. In some instances, assessments were administered only to children for whom no valid score has been obtained during a previous survey. In 1988 a procedure was introduced by which children ages 10 or 11 were designated to complete any assessment for which they were age-eligible in order to establish a representative index group for future analyses. Starting in 1996, the Self-Perception Profile (What I Am Like) was only administered to children ages 12 and over. The McCarthy Verbal Memory Subscale was administered for the final time in 1994. In 2004, very young children were not administered assessments, which means that scores are not available for Motor and Social Development in 2004. In 2016, only the Mother Supplement assessments were completed (Behavior Problems Index, the HOME-SF, and Motor and Social Development). The Self-Perception Profile was administered as part of the Young Adult survey in 2016 and 2018.

Young Adult Survey

By 1994, substantial numbers of children of NLSY79 mothers had reached at least mid-adolescence. Because of the enormous potential for further research possibilities with the NLSY79 cohort and their offspring, the decision was made to separate these older children into a third NLSY79 component: the Young Adults. Beginning in 1994, NLSY79 children ages 15 and older by the end of a survey year were no longer given cognitive and other assessments, but instead received a more standard Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) survey. This Young Adult CAPI questionnaire focuses on the transition to adulthood, with detailed questions on education, employment, training, health, fertility, parenting, family formation, attitudes, interactions with family members, substance use, sexual activity, non-normative activities, and pro-social behaviors. Many questions in the Young Adult survey parallel those asked of their mothers over the years, particularly when their mothers had been at comparable life cycle points. However, the Young Adult survey contains more in-depth data in certain areas such as sexual activity, drug use, schooling activities, attitudes, and marriage and cohabitation histories. The primary interview mode for the 1994 through 1998 survey rounds was in-person interviewing. Beginning with the 2000 survey round, the primary mode has shifted to telephone interviewing.

Older children who are defined as eligible for the Young Adult survey for a given round are said to be "fielded" in that survey year. Not all older children represented in the child file are eligible to be fielded as Young Adults, for a variety of reasons. Whereas the Child/Young Adult file includes all children known to have been born to NLSY79 mothers, the older children of mothers in the no longer interviewed military ;and poor white oversamples are ineligible to be interviewed as Young Adults. Additionally, children who have no child interviews or only one assessment point from very early in the child study, such as 1986 or 1988, and/or who have not been co-resident with their mothers at least part time are usually not fielded in the Young Adult sample. Generally speaking, we field older children who have either been assessed or interviewed in recent rounds, or who are currently or were typically living with their mother either full or part time during at least part of their childhood. Of course, not all of the children we field as Young Adults get interviewed. Mothers may refuse to allow younger Young Adults (under age 18) to be interviewed, the Young Adults themselves may refuse, or we may fail to locate them. 

Constraints on the Young Adult sample have changed over time as follows:

  • In 1994 and 1996, the Young Adult sample included all children who were age 15 and over by December 31 of that year and who met the other selection criteria, having been assessed or living with their mom in the two previous rounds.
  • Due to budgetary constraints, the Young Adult sample in 1998 was limited to youth through age 20 as of the interview date who met the other selection criteria.
  • With additional funding through a grant from NICHD, since 2000 the sample again included Young Adults ages 21 and older, as well as those ages 15 to 20. The selection criteria were widened to include age eligible children with at least some assessment history; therefor, children who were age-eligible but not fielded in 1994 to 1998, but had some assessment history, were fielded for the first time in 2000.
  • In 2000 only, the young adults between the ages of 15 and 20 of 38% of the black and Hispanic oversample mothers were not fielded for budgetary reasons. These Young Adults were once again eligible to be interviewed in 2002.
  • Beginning in 2010, Young Adult respondents over the age of 30 have been moved to a four-year interview cycle. The interviewed sample is selected by age as of December 31 of the survey year, so that approximately half of the older young adults are eligible each round. Beginning in 2010, young adults age 31-32, 35-36, 39-40, 43-44, etc., as of December 31 of the survey year are not fielded.
  • Beginning in 2016, the fielding age for the Young Adult was lowered so that children ages 12 and older were fielded. This ensured that we collected some of the same information from the children who would have been age-eligible for the Child Self-Administered Supplement had the Child been fielded. Children age 14 answered the same questions as those ages 15 and 16, while those ages 12 and 13 answered far fewer questions. 
Subscribe to NLSY79 Child and Young Adult