Skip to main content

NLSY79

Types of Variables

There are six types of variables present in the NLSY79 data. Some are the raw answers provided by the respondent, while others are constructed. Types of variables include:

  1. Direct (or raw) responses from a questionnaire or other survey instrument
  2. Edited variables constructed from raw data according to consistent and detailed sets of procedures, such as occupational codes, KEY variables, and so forth
  3. Constructed variables based on responses to more than one data item, either cross-sectionally or longitudinally, and edited for consistency where necessary, such as variables on the NLSY79 Supplemental Fertility File ("Fertility and Relationship History/Created" area of interest in NLS Investigator)
  4. Constructed variables from other sources, such as the County & City Data Book information present on the NLSY79 Geocode data files
  5. Variables provided by an outside organization based on sources not directly available to the user, such as the high school survey and transcript data, scores from the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, and so forth
  6. Data collected from or about one universe of respondents reconstructed with a second universe as the unit of observation, such as variables on the NLSY79 Child File

The type of variable impacts:

  • the title or variable description naming each variable,
  • physical placement of each variable within the codebook, and
  • location of a variable within a given area of interest.

Reference numbers

Every variable in the main NLSY79 data files has been assigned a reference number or identifier that determines its relative position within the data file and NLS documentation system. Persons contacting NLS User Services should be prepared to discuss their question or problem in relationship to the reference number(s) of the variable(s) in question.

Important information: Data consistency processes

In general, the Center for Human Resource Research (CHRR) does not impute missing values or perform internal consistency checks across waves. Exceptions to this general rule occur when financial support is available, as is the case with the consistency edits performed since 1982 on the NLSY79 fertility data. When bounded interviewing methods are used, responses from the previous interview appear in the text of a question, both to verify that past information and as a point from which to update current information. Bounded interviewing techniques, using data from the Information Sheets or flap items, are intended to impose consistency across waves. Data quality checks most often occur in the process of constructing (1) cumulative and current status variables, such as 'Highest Grade Completed,' and (2) NLSY79 employment-related variables, such as 'Weeks Working in Past Calendar Year,' 'Total Tenure with Employer,' and so forth. More information on NLSY79 instruments can be found in the Survey Instruments section.

Once assigned to variables within the NLSY79 data files, reference numbers remain constant through subsequent revisions of the files. Reference numbers are assigned sequentially, with variables referring to the first survey year having a lower reference number than those variables specific to the second year and so forth.

Occasionally variables are created in a year later than that in which the data were actually collected. These variables are frequently given a reference number with a decimal value that reflects the year in which the actual data were gathered rather than the year the created variable was constructed, for example, R01461.01. Beginning with the 1993 survey, decimals are also used to indicate that more than one variable has been derived from a single question.

Important information: Reference numbers

Reference numbers in the main and Geocode data files have traditionally begun with the letter "R." Beginning with the 2000 data release, the work history variables are incorporated with the main data on the same data set. However, these work history variables are assigned reference numbers beginning with "W" for easy identification. Beginning in 2006, government program participation or recipiency variables are assigned reference numbers beginning with "G,", health module variables are assigned reference numbers beginning with "H," and all other variables are assigned reference numbers beginning with "T."

Variable descriptions or variable titles

Each variable within NLSY79 main file data files has been assigned an 80 character summary title that serves as the verbal representation of that variable throughout the documentation.

Variable titles are assigned by CHRR archivists who endeavor, within the limitations described below, to capture the core "content" of the variable and to incorporate within the title:

  1. "NLS Investigator areas of interest" that facilitate easy identification of related variables,
  2. "Universe identifiers" that specify the subset of respondents for which each variable is relevant, and
  3. "Reference periods" that indicate the specific period of time (e.g., survey year, calendar year) to which the data pertain for some variables. Universe identifiers and reference periods are discussed below.

Universe identifiers

If two ostensibly identical variables differ only in that they refer to different universes, the variable title will include a reference to the applicable universe by either appending in parentheses to each title the appropriate universe (Example 1) or by identifying the universe before the variable title (Example 2).

  • Example 1: 'Did R Have Any Job since Last Int? (Unemployed or OLF) (1994)'
  • Example 2: 'Female - Number of Children R Has Had since Last Interview'

Reference periods

Variable descriptions may include a phrase indicating the time period to which the data refer. When a date follows a verbal description of a variable and is preceded by the prepositional phrase "in 19XX," the date identifies the calendar year for which the relevant information was collected.

  • Example: 'Received Income from Child Support in 1991?' This 1992 survey question refers to child support payments received in calendar year 1991.

Important information: Verifying variable details

Do not presume that two variables with the same or similar titles necessarily have the same (1) universe of respondents or (2) coding categories or (3) time reference period. While the universe identifier conventions discussed above have been utilized, users are urged to consult the questionnaires for skip patterns and exact time periods for a given variable and to factor in the relevant fielding period(s) for the cohort. In addition, variables with similar content may have completely different titles, depending on the type of variable (raw versus created).

Variables with similar content, such as information on respondents' labor force status, may have completely different titles, depending on the type of variable (raw versus created). In addition, such variables may be located within different NLSY79 areas of interest.

  • Example 1: 'Employment Status Recode' (ESR), in 1979-98 and 2006, is the created or reconstructed version of the 'Activity Most of Survey Week' raw variable. The 'Activity' variable is derived from the first question of the full series of questions used by the Department of Labor (DOL) to obtain employment status; the title reflects questionnaire content. ESR, on the other hand, reflects the procedure used to recode the 'Activity' variable. This produces a constructed variable for all respondents based upon responses to the 'Activity' question and all other questions used by the DOL to obtain employment status. These other questions serve to qualify and refine employment status beyond the answer to the initial 'Activity' question.
  • Example 2: NLSY79 raw fertility variables appear within the various "Children," "Birth Record," or "Birth Record xxxx" areas of interest while edited and constructed versions of these variables appear within the "Fertility and Relationship History/Created" area of interest.

Finally, different archivists, for a period of more than 20 years, have performed the task of assigning variable descriptions to data. While every effort has been made to maintain consistency, users may find some differences in variable title and area of interest assignment.

New variables created by researchers

Researchers sometimes use the NLS public datasets to generate a new variable to use in their research. In some cases, researchers like to make that new variable publicly available (through their own data repository) so that it can be easily accessed for follow-up studies. This is permissible as long as researchers are using public NLS data (rather than restricted) and that they make it clear they are the author of the variable rather than the NLS team.

Survey Instruments

The primary variables found within the main data set are derived directly from survey instruments, such as questionnaires, household interview forms, and so forth. This section describes each of the NLSY79 instruments in the order that they appear in the following list.

Types of NLSY79 survey instruments and user aids

This section also explains the conventions used in the NLSY79 documentation system to identify questionnaire items from some of the primary survey instruments. An additional document, the interviewer reference manual, provides background information on specific survey instruments.

Important information: Instrument terminology

Questionnaire Item or Question Number. This generic term refers the user to the printed source of data for a given variable. A questionnaire item may be a question, a check item, or an interviewer's reference item that appears within one of the survey instruments. Each questionnaire item has been assigned a number or a combination of numbers and letters within the NLSY79 documentation system to assist the user in linking each variable to its location in a survey instrument. NLSY79 questionnaire item assignment is complex and varies across survey years and instruments. For some years, NLSY79 questionnaire item identification is dependent upon various combinations of the deck and column numbers used in data entry that are printed to the right of the answer categories on the survey instrument. In other years, designation is made by section and question numbers. Specific information on the conventions used appears below, after each relevant instrument, under the subheadings "Question Numbering."

A unique set of survey instruments has been used during each survey year to collect information from respondents. The term "survey instrument" is used to refer to:

  1. the questionnaires that serve as the primary source of information on a given respondent
  2. questionnaire supplements fielded during select survey years that contain additional sets of questions
  3. documents such as the household interview forms or household record cards that collect information on members of each respondent's household

Users should be aware that, while the source of the majority of variables in the main NLSY79 data files is the questionnaire or one of the other survey instruments, certain NLSY79 variables are created either from other NLSY79 variables or from information found in an external data source (see Types of Variables).

Household information

Each NLSY79 interview includes the collection of information on the members of each respondent's household. For NLSY79 respondents, such household data are collected prior to the administration of the main questionnaire and for many years used separate survey instruments called the Household Interview Forms. Both the instruments used for the yearly household data collection and the household screening instruments that were used to draw the samples of respondents are described below.

NLSY79 1978 Household Screener and Interviewer's Reference Manual

This document (fully titled NLSY-National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Force Behavior Interviewer's Manual-Household Screening, NORC 1978) contains detailed information on the 1978 screening of households conducted by NORC from which the civilian youth samples (the cross-sectional and supplemental samples) were drawn. It provides a copy of the short 25-question screener, question-by-question specifications for administering the form, and a sample completed screener. Most of the information collected on each respondent during the screening is presented within the data set. The screener is the source for important data such as the sex and race or ethnicity variables that were used to assign each respondent to a specific NLSY79 subsample, as well as the relationship codes (for example, brother, sister, husband, wife) that allow researchers to identify related NLSY79 respondents who shared a household at the time of the screening.

Question numbering

Question numbers for the 1978 screener were arbitrarily assigned by NORC using an artificial questionnaire section number that followed the last section of the 1979 questionnaire ("Section 25" for all screener variables) even though the actual administration of the screener preceded that of the 1979 questionnaire.

Users should note that screener questions are identified within the documentation as 1979 variables even though these data were collected during 1978. Most variables from the screener use the phrase HOUSEHOLD SCREENER at the beginning of the variable title, appear physically within the codebook after the 1979 household record series, and have been placed within the "1978 Screener" and "Household Record" areas of interest.

Household interview forms

Yearly household information for the NLSY79 is collected from either the respondent or the head of household prior to the administration of the main questionnaire. NLSY79 Household Interview Forms are used to:

  1. enumerate all persons currently living in the respondent's household
  2. record information about each person's age, highest grade completed, work experience in the past year, and relationship to the respondent
  3. collect, during the 1979-1986 surveys, certain family income information

Information on household members is collected using the questions on the Household Interview Forms; however, much of the information is actually recorded on the "Household Enumeration" section of the Face Sheet discussed below.

During the 1979-1986 interviews, different versions of the Household Interview Forms were administered depending upon the type of residence of the respondent. Version A was used if the respondent was living with his or her parents (or in-laws), in which case the interview was conducted with the respondent's parents (or in-laws) in order to gather information on household income sources. Version B was used if the respondent was living in group quarters, such as a dormitory or the military, or in temporary facilities, such as a hospital or prison, and was administered to the respondent. If the respondent had a permanent residence elsewhere, the household interview gathered information about that household. Version C was administered to the respondent if he or she was living in his or her own dwelling unit, military family housing, an orphanage, a religious institution, or other individual quarters or was the head of a family unit. Table 1 in the Household Composition section of depicts, by survey year, the universe and residential unit(s) specific to each form.

During the first eight survey rounds, many respondents were younger than 18 and living with their parents; thus, Version A was frequently used. Beginning with the 1987 survey, all respondents were 21 or older and living predominantly on their own; consequently, the household interview forms were consolidated into a single version. For 1979-1986, these forms appear as separate documents. Beginning with the 1987 interview, household interview questions were incorporated within each year's questionnaire. Some variation in administration of these forms has occurred over survey years. Users should refer to each survey year's Interviewer's Reference Manual for more information.

Interviewing aids

Certain instruments used during fielding of the NLSY79 provide researchers with interview- and respondent-specific information that appears as variables within the NLSY79 data files.

Face Sheet

Immediately prior to fielding, a Face Sheet is computer-generated for each respondent and forwarded to the interviewer assigned to that case. The Face Sheet contains:

  1. various items of respondent-specific information (name, address, phone number)
  2. information about each member of the household or family unit as of the last interview (full name, sex, relationship to youth, education, and whether the household member worked during the year), generated from the most recent administration of the Household Interview Forms
  3. a historical overview of previous interview rounds (whether the respondent refused to be interviewed, the respondent was interviewed after initially refusing, the interview was complete or incomplete, and so forth)
  4. for the 1980-1986 survey years, information on the version of the Household Interview Form that was used in the previous interview

This information is used to alert the interviewer and field manager to potential problems, assist them in preparing a successful location and fielding strategy, and provide details necessary to conduct an efficient interview, such as a listing of previous employers. Information about the respondent's household and family unit from each survey year's Face Sheet can be found by searching the "Household Record" area of interest with NLS Investigator. Sample Face Sheets for most survey years can be found in the various Interviewer Reference Manuals.

Information Sheet

This document contains data on the respondent from the previous interview that will be referred to and used to update information during the interviewing process. Items found on this document include marital status, high school completion status, university last attended, names of previous employers, training program enrollment, and pregnancy status. This information enables the interviewer to accurately route the respondent through the relevant sections of the questionnaire and provides on-the-spot reconciliation of earlier errors. Information Sheet items appear within the NLSY79 data set ("Last Interview Information" area of interest in NLS Investigator). Beginning with the 1993 interviews, the information sheet is incorporated into the CAPI instrument. Sample Information Sheets can be found in the Interviewer Reference Manuals. In CAPI surveys, information sheet data are stored electronically on the interviewer's laptop and accessed by the survey program during the interview; no paper information sheet is used.

Children's Record Forms (CRF) (1985-1992)

This interviewing aid containing information on biological (collected each survey) and nonbiological (that is, adopted or step-; collected biennially) children was used in the 1985-1992 surveys to:

  1. provide identification numbers, names, dates of birth, sex, and deceased/adopted status for each child
  2. identify special sections of the main questionnaire (such as immunization, feeding, and so forth) that needed to be administered for particular children

Sample Children's Record Forms can be found in the Interviewer's Reference Manuals. Beginning with the 1993 interviews, this form is incorporated into the CAPI instrument. As with information sheets, these data are automatically accessed by the survey program during CAPI interviews, so the hard copy CRF is no longer needed.

Questionnaires

There are separate and distinctly different questionnaires for each survey year of the NLSY79. Each questionnaire is organized around a set of topical subjects, the titles of which usually appear on either the first page of each section of the questionnaire or as a header.

Important information: Questionnaire use

The questionnaires are critical elements of the NLSY79 documentation system and should be used by each researcher to ascertain the wording of questions, coding categories, and the universe of respondents asked to respond to a given question.

NLSY79 questionnaires record:

  1. interview dates
  2. responses to the topical survey questions (see discussion below)
  3. locating information which will assist NORC in finding the respondent for the next interview
  4. interviewer remarks on such topics as the race and sex of respondent, language in which the interview was conducted, interviewer's impressions, and so forth

Show cards

These are interviewing aids used in conjunction with the questionnaire and list the possible response categories for selected questions. Show cards help the respondent keep the more complicated response categories in mind.

NLSY79 questionnaires explore the following core topics:

  • current labor force status
  • jobs and employers
  • work experience and attitudes
  • training
  • assets and income
  • family background
  • marital history
  • fertility
  • regular schooling
  • military service
  • health

Additional sets of questions have been fielded during select survey years on such topics as:

  • childcare
  • alcohol use
  • drug use
  • job search methods
  • educational/occupational aspirations
  • school discipline
  • pre-and post-natal health behaviors
  • delinquency
  • childhood residences

During the 1979-1992 paper-and-pencil (PAPI) interviews, questionnaires and other survey instruments were preprinted paper products used during fielding. With the advent of computer-assisted interviewing (CAPI) in 1993, the "questionnaire" became a series of visual screens that not only told the interviewers what questions to ask but provided helpful instructions on how to administer the interview. Separate supplemental documents such as the job-specific Employer Supplements were integrated into the electronic main questionnaire. NLSY79 CAPI questionnaires incorporate some helpful elements of the traditional codebook, with reference numbers assigned to variables and greater specificity on coding and universes provided within each codeblock.

Question numbering

The conventions used to assign question numbers within the NLSY79 documentation system vary by survey year and are based on various combinations of the questionnaire section number, the question number, or the deck and column numbers (Table 1). Users can locate a variable within the codebook--which represents each question fielded in the same order as it appears within the questionnaire--by finding the question number which appears (in parentheses) to the right of each reference number.

Table 1. NLSY79 question numbering conventions
Survey Year Designated By Example
1979 Section # (S) and Question # (Q) S02Q01: Question 1 in Section 2
1980-1982 Section # (S), Deck # (D), and Column # S06D1314: Question appearing in Section 6, deck 13, column 14
1983-1987,
1989-1992
Deck # and Column # Q0413: Question appearing in deck 4, column 13
1988 Section # and Question # (Q) Q5.3: Question 3 in Section 5
1993-present Section #, Question # (Q) and Loop # as applicable Q5-26.3: Question 26 in Section 5, with the appended .03 representing the third loop

Deck and column numbers are vestigial items that were used to locate the data when it was input on punch cards. The deck numbers are printed at the upper right hand corner of each page in the survey instruments and at the beginning point for each new deck for the 1980 through 1992 instruments. The column numbers are printed to the left of the response categories. If the variable contains more than one digit, the column reference is to the starting column for that variable. 

Important information: Questionnaire content

Although NLSY79 questionnaires are to some extent topically arranged, the user should be aware that the absence of a section title on a given subject does not mean that no questions on that topic were fielded during that survey year. For example, the 1987 and 1989 NLSY79 questionnaires contain no section entitled "Childcare." However, a small number of childcare questions were asked in those years and appear within the "Fertility" section of the questionnaires.

Questionnaire supplements

Separate instruments called "supplements" have been used since the onset of the NLSY79 to administer distinct sets of questions. The NLSY79 has made extensive use of supplements for collecting information from separate universes such as schools or children or for administering confidential sets of questions on illegal activities or abortion. The following section describes each supplemental instrument used for the NLSY79. The use of such separate supplements has diminished with CAPI-administered interviews. In the main youth and young adult instruments, all supplements are now incorporated as electronic modules in a questionnaire. Children still use multiple supplements, one self-report, one interviewer-administered, and one completed by the mother.

Illegal Activities Form J (1980)

This confidential questionnaire supplement, administered during the 1980 survey, contains a series of questions designed to collect information on the extent of respondents' participation in various delinquent and criminal activities such as:

  • skipping school
  • alcohol/marijuana use
  • vandalism
  • shoplifting
  • drug dealing
  • and robbery

This series supplements those on reported contacts with the criminal justice system collected within the main questionnaire.

Employer Supplement

Information about each employer for whom a NLSY79 respondent has worked since the last interview has been collected since 1980. One Employer Supplement is administered for each employer and contains questions about gaps when the respondent was not working, the number of hours worked, the type of work done, and the wages earned at that job. Note: Comparable information for the 1979 survey can be found in the "On Jobs" section of the main questionnaire and within the separate single sheet 1979 Employer Flap. Beginning with the 1993 CAPI interviews, all employer supplement questions appear within the body of the main questionnaire.

Question numbering

Five numbering systems have been used to identify questionnaire items within the Employer Supplement (Table 2). Although data from up to 10 jobs are collected, the main data set includes information on only the first five jobs since few individuals work at more than five jobs between interviews. Data on all ten jobs are used to construct a series of summary variables for hours and weeks worked; see the Labor Force Status, Time & Tenure with Employers, and Work Experience sections for more information.

Table 2. Employer Supplement question numbering conventions: 1980-present
Survey Years Question Numbering Description
1980-1987
1989-1991
A supplement identifier, i.e., the letter B, representing the first supplement, through F, the fifth supplement, is combined with the deck and column numbers preprinted in the instrument. The deck numbers for the first Employer Supplement would be B1, B2, B3, and B4 while the second supplement would use C with each deck and column number. The question number QB140 thus refers to B (the first supplement), 1 (deck 1), 40 (column 40), while QC166 refers to Employer Supplement C, deck 1, column 66.
1988 Letter designations, i.e., ESB, ESC, ESD, ESE, ESF, continue to identify the specific supplement in use; however, deck and column numbers are not used. Appended to the supplement identifier is the actual question number as printed in the supplement. For example, ESB.1 refers to the first supplement, question 1.
1992 A series of supplemental deck numbers are attached to the column numbers preprinted in the supplement. Question numbers 7439-7831 refer to information collected in the first supplement, 7939-8331 to the second supplement, 8439-8831 to the third supplement, 8939-9331 to the fourth supplement, and 9439-9831 to the fifth supplement.
1993-1996 The designation QES and a number, e.g., QES5, indicates that this series of questions collected information about the fifth employer. Hyphenated numbers attached to the QES5, e.g., QES5-26, QES5-27, etc. indicate the specific question number within the series, while a decimal number following a question number, QES5-26.3, reflects the third repetition of that question for that employer.
1998-present Beginning in 1998, the number identifying the employer was moved to a decimal after the question number. The question previously labeled QES5-26.3, for example, was now designated as QES-26.05.03. The decimal number ".05" indicates this information was collected about the fifth employer. Again, ".03" represents the third repetition of question 26 for the fifth employer.

Fertility Supplement (1983)

Respondents (both male and female) who were not interviewed during 1982 were administered a special set of supplementary fertility questions during the 1983 survey. The Fertility Supplement was designed to collect complete fertility data, including all live births for males and females, and all pregnancy losses and contraception between pregnancies for females. For those not interviewed in 1982, these questions replaced the fertility questions found in Section 10 of the 1983 questionnaire.

Confidential Abortion Forms

Biennially beginning in 1984, female NLSY79 respondents have completed a short confidential abortion form which elicited information on the number and dates of each abortion. Copies of these supplementary questions are provided within the survey instrument sets. The 1984 form also collected information on the dates that respondents left school prior to 1979 if leaving school was associated with early childbearing. Beginning in 2002, the abortion form was included in the main instrument. 

Drug Use Supplement (1988, 1992, 1994, and 1998)

The 1988 supplement contains the confidential set of drug use questions which were, through a random assignment process, self-administered by the respondent in half of the cases and administered by the interviewer in the other half. Questions were asked on age at first use of marijuana and cocaine, extent of lifetime and most recent use, and method(s) practiced in using cocaine. The 1992 and 1994 supplements contain the confidential set of questions on respondents' use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, or other drugs. Users should note that while the 1988 and 1992 supplements are bound as separate booklets, the 1994 and 1998 supplements are bound with the main questionnaire.

Childhood Residence Calendar (1988)

The 1988 questionnaire contained a special section detailing the living arrangements of respondents from birth through age 18. The Childhood Residence Calendar, the interviewing aid used to collect these data, depicts for each year of life the type of parent (biological-, adoptive-, or step-) with whom each respondent lived for at least four months and, for those ages when he or she was not living with a parent, in what other arrangements the respondent resided, such as, with grandparents, foster parents, friends, or in a children's home, detention center, or other institution.

Supplemental data collections

High School Survey (1980)

A supplemental survey of the last secondary school attended by civilian NLSY79 respondents was conducted in 1980. This survey gathered information on each school's grading system, course offerings, dropout rate, student body composition, and faculty characteristics, as well as respondent scores from a variety of intelligence and aptitude tests. Copies of the high school survey instruments, the "School Questionnaire" and the "Student's School Record Information" form, are included within the documentation item called the NLSY High School Transcript Survey: Overview and Documentation

Transcript Surveys (1980-1983)

Transcript information on up to 64 courses was collected from high school records for civilian NLSY79 respondents who were expected to complete high school within the United States. A copy of the instrument used to collect transcript information, called the "Transcript Coding Sheet," is included within the NLSY High School Transcript Survey: Overview and Documentation (see School & Transcript Surveys Documentation in the NLSY79 Codebook Supplement).

ASVAB

The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) was administered to most NLSY79 respondents in 1980 as part of a Department of Defense effort to renorm this military enlistment test. The scores from this supplemental data collection are included in the NLSY79 data file. For details, see the Aptitude, Achievement & Intelligence Scores section.

Interviewer's Reference Manual (Question-by-Question [Q by Q] specifications)

Each questionnaire or set of survey instruments is accompanied by an Interviewer's Reference Manual. This document provides NORC interviewers with background information on the NLSY79 and detailed question-by-question instructions for administering and coding the questionnaire, Employer Supplement, Household Interview Forms, and other survey supplements. Separate Q by Q's exist for each survey year. Printed copies of the CAPI help screen information, which each interviewer could access during the course of the interview, replace the traditional interviewer's manual instrument beginning with the 1993 release.

Environmental Variables

Important information: Viewing asterisk tables

  • Click a topic below to expand and collapse the corresponding asterisk table.
  • Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Region of residence * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Current residence urban or rural * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Current residence in metropolitan statistical area * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Changes in residence since January 1, 1978, or date of last interview (collected as a history) * *   *                             * * * * * * * * * * * *

Human Capital and Other Socioeconomic Variables

Important information: Viewing asterisk tables

  • Click a topic below to expand and collapse the corresponding asterisk table.
  • Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Nationality and birthplace *       *                                                  
Birth date *   *                                                      
Ethnic self-identification (revised 2002) *                                     *                    
Year foreign-born R entered the United States         *             *                                    
Month and year R entered the United States to live for at least 6 months *                     *                                    
Immigration or visa status                       *                                    
Religious affiliation, frequency of attendance *     *                             *                      
Periods lived away from parents (birth to age 18) *                 *                                        
Non-English language spoken when R was a child *                                                          
Were magazines, newspapers, or library cards available in home when R was age 14 *                                                          
Person(s) R lived with at age 14 *                     *                                    
Occupations of primary adults when R was 14 *                                                          
Birthplace of parents: State or country *                                                          
Highest grade completed by father and mother *                                                          
Employment status of father and mother in past year * *                                                        
Are R's parents living * *                               * * * * * * * * * * * * *
R's biological parents---life status, health, cause of death (40+/50+/60+ health modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Current enrollment status, date of last enrollment * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  
Highest grade completed * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  
Reason stopped attending school * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  
Highest degree and date received                   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  
Is or was school public or private *                                                          
High school curriculum * * * * * * *                                              
Comparison of high school courses to skills training                             *                              
College degree received * * * * * *       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  
Type of college attending (2- or 4-year) * * * * * * * *   * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  
Field of study or specialization in college * * * * * * * *   * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
College tuition *                                                          
Educational loans or financial aid in college * * * * * * * *   * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Attitude toward selected aspects of high school *                                                          
Courses taken during last year of high school *                                                          
Ever suspended or expelled from school; date   *                                                        

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Type(s) of training * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Number of weeks, hours per week in training * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Was training completed * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Was degree, certificate, or journeyman's card obtained * *                                                        
Was training related to specific job or employer       * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Was training related to a promotion                       * * * * *                            
Reason for training       * * *             * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Method of financing training       * * *       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Informal job learning activities (questions vary)                             * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Participation in programs * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Type of program * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Satisfaction with program * * * * * * * * *                                          
Did program help on subsequent jobs * * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * *                        
Services provided by program * * * * * * * * *                                          
Length of participation in program * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Hours per week and per day spent in program * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Amount of income from participating in program * * * * * * * *                                            
Aspects liked most and least about programs *                                                          
Reasons for entering and leaving programs * * * * * * * * *                                          

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Does health limit work, duration of limitation * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Type of health problem (ICD-9 code) * * * *                                                    
Work-related injury or illness (ICD-9 code)                   * * *   * * * * * *                      
Height     * *     *                             * * * * * * *    
Weight     * *     * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Health insurance coverage: R, spouse, children                     * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Frequency and intensity of R's physical activity                                   * * * * * * * * * * * * *
R's general health behaviors                                       * * * * * * * * * * *
General perception of health (40+/50+/60+ health modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Does health interfere with daily activities (40+/50+/60+ health modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Emotional health in past 4 weeks (40+/50+/60+ health modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CES-Depression Scale                           *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Loneliness

                                                          *
R's various health problems (heart problems, cancer, diabetes, poor eyesight or hearing, and so forth) (40+/50+/60+ health modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Time spent on healthcare activities (40+/50+ health modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * *      
Diagnosed with asthma (40+/50+ modules)                                   * * * * * * * * * *      
Diagnosed with Alzheimer's/dementia (60+ health module)                                                       * * *
Satisfaction With Life Scale/SWLS (60+ health module)                                                       * * *
General Anxiety Disorder/GAD scale (60+ health module)                                                       * * *
Brief Resilience Scale/BRS (60+health module)                                                       *
Note E.1
   
Cognition                                           * * * * * * * *  
National Death Index data                                                         *  

Note E.1: In 2018, four items from the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) were included in the 60+ Health module. The BRS questions were discontinued partway through the 2020 survey round, but a portion of the 2020 BRS data collected is available in the public release.

All spouse items also refer to partners beginning in 1994.

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Dating behaviors and attitudes (unmarried females)                   *       *   * * * * * * * * * * *        
Marital status * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Changes in marital status since 1/1/1978 or previous interview; number and duration of marriages * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Month, year R and partner began living together                       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Did R and spouse live together continuously before marriage (or R and partner continuously until now)                       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Changes in cohabitation with partner since last interview                                       * * * * * * * * * * *
Occupation of spouse * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Race of Spouse                                             * * * * * * * *
Extent spouse worked in previous calendar year * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Current labor force status, reason not employed for spouse                   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Shift worked by spouse       *           * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *        
Rate of pay, hourly rate of pay of spouse                       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Spouse/partner's religious affiliation and attendance       *                             * * * * * * * * * * * *
Number of spouse's marriages, details       *                           * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Effect of spouse's health on R's work       *                                                    
Quality of R's relationship (14 items) (mothers in 1988; females all other years)                   *       *   * * * * * * * * * * * *      
Age at which R expects to marry *                                                          

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Relationship of household or family members to R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Household or family members' demographics (sex, age, highest grade completed, work status in past year) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Number of dependents or exemptions * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Number and ages of R's children living in household * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Expected number of children *     * * * * *   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * *          
Number of children R considers ideal *     *                                                    
Healthcare during pregnancy (females)         * * * *   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Postnatal infant healthcare and feeding (females)         * * * *   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Father's relationship with children (males)                                   * *                      
Fertility history * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Use of birth control methods       *   * * *   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Pregnancies not resulting in live births (includes how ended through 1990)       * * * * *   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * *      
Characteristics of children with asthma                                         * * * * * *        

Asked of female respondents only in even years after 1986.

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Current childcare arrangements       * * * * * * *                                        
Childcare during first 3 years of life               *   *       *   * * * * * * * * * * *        
Cost per week       *     * *   *                                        
Number of hours per week       * * * * *   *                                        
Is childcare a hindrance to R's work, school, or training       * * *       * *                                      
Extent of various neighborhood problems                           *   * * * *                      

All spouse items also refer to partners beginning in 1994.

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Total family income in previous calendar year * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Income of R and spouse in previous calendar year from: Farm or own business * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Income of R and spouse in previous calendar year from: Wages or salary * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Income of R and spouse in previous calendar year from: Business or Professional Practice Investment or Ownership                                         *   *   *   * * * *
Unemployment compensation * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Public assistance * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Food Stamps * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Targeted cash or noncash benefits                                   * *                      
Pensions/Social Security * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Military service * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Veterans' benefits, workers' compensation, other disability (collected separately beginning in 2002) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Other sources * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
R receives government rent subsidy or public housing * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *   *   *   *  
Income from child support * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Child support expected vs. received                             * * * * *                      
Rights to estate or trust; income from inheritances (since last interview)                                     * * * * * * * * * * * *
R claimed Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) on previous tax return, amount                                     * * * * * * * *        
Possession of various assets (R and spouse)   * * * * * * * * * * *   * * * * * *   *   *   *   *   *  
Asset market value (R and spouse)             * * * * * *   * * * * * *   *   *   *   *   *  
Amount of debt             * * * * * *   * * * * * *   *   * * * * * * *  
Amount spent on food, other than Food Stamps                       * * * * *           *                
Effect of 1996 welfare reform on R (shorter in 2000)                                   * *         *            
R receives targeted benefits from public assistance program (gas vouchers, childcare, and so forth)                                     *                      
R ever declare bankruptcy                                         *   * * * * *   *  
Home foreclosure                                               * * * * * * *
R has a will                                                 * * * *   *
Financial literacy                                                 * * * *    
Educational expenditures                                                   *        
Effects of Coronavirus outbreak on earnings                                                         * *
R and spouse receive Coronavirus stimulus check                                                         * *

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Branch of Armed Forces * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Months spent in Armed Forces * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Military occupation(s) * * * * * * *                                              
ROTC or officer training *                                                          
Reserve or guard activities * * * * * * *                                              
Pay grade and income * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Type and amount of military training * * * * * * *                                              
Does R use military skills on civilian job * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Does R do same kind of work in recent civilian job as in military job       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Formal education received while in service * * * * * * *                                              
Family members who have served on active duty         *                                                  
Participation in Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) (after 1985, with GI bill) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *      
Attitude toward military service * * * * * * *                                              
Future military plans * * * * * * *                                              
Reason for entering and leaving military   * * * * * *                                              
Contact with military recruiters * * * * * * *                                              
Type of discharge   * *                                                      
Enlistment or reenlistment bonuses received * * * * * * *                                              
Civilian job offer at time of discharge   * * * * * *                                              
Return to same employer after active duty   * * * * * *                                              

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Would R like more education or training; type *                                                          
How much education desired and actually attained *   * *                                                    
Kind of work R would like to be doing at age 35 *     *                                                    
Expectation of achieving occupational goal *     *                                                    

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Knowledge of World of Work score *                                                          
Would R work if had enough money to live on *                                                          
Characteristics of job R is willing to take (R unemployed or out of labor force) * * * * * * * *                                            
Reaction to hypothetical job offers *                                                          
Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (Rotter) *                                                 * * *    
Mastery Scale (Pearlin)                           *                                
Attitude toward women working *     *         *                       *                  
Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg) (10 items)   *             *                         *                
CES-Depression Scale                           *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Person having most influence on R, his or her responses to various situations *                                                          
Retirement expectations                                         * * * * * * * * * *
R risk aversion questions                                               * * *        
Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)                                                   * * *    
Life satisfaction                                                   * * * * *
Computer and internet access                                     * * * * * * * *     * *

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Perception of age, race, and sex discrimination *     *                                                    
Reason for problems in obtaining employment *     *                                                    

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Activities within last year (20 items)   *                                                        
Income from illegal activities within last year   *                                                        
Alcohol consumption in last week or month       * * * *     * *     *   *       *   * * * * *   * * *
Extent of cigarette use           *               *   *   *         * * * *   * * *
Age R first smoked and stopped smoking cigarettes           *
(first smoked only)
              *   *   *                        
Extent of marijuana use   *       *       *       *   *   *                        
Age R first used marijuana           *       *       *   *   *                        
Extent of cocaine use, age R first used           *       *       *   *   *                        
Extent of "crack" cocaine use, age R first used                           *   *   *                        
Ever used sedatives, barbiturates, and so forth           *               *   *   *                        
Cigarette and alcohol use during pregnancy         * * * *   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * *    
Marijuana and cocaine use during pregnancy                   *   *   *   * * * * * * * * * * * * *    

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Number of times stopped by police   *                                                        
Number of times booked or arrested   *                                                        
Number of convictions, charges   *                                                        
Number of times incarcerated; date of release   *                                                        

Variable

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Use of time at various activities (school, work, watching TV, household chores, and so forth)     *                                                      
Volunteerism/Philanthropy                                           *   * * *        

Retention & Reasons for Noninterview

Retention vs. response rate

Retention rates for NLSY79 respondents from 1979 to 1993 exceeded 90 percent. Rates from 1994 until 2000 exceeded 80 percent. Rates from 2002 until 2014 were in the 70s. Retention rate is calculated by dividing the number of respondents interviewed by the number of respondents remaining eligible for interview. All 1979 (round 1) respondents including those reported as deceased are eligible for interviews, with the exception of those who have been permanently dropped from the sample. In the round 29 (2020) survey, 6,535 civilian and military respondents out of the 9,964 eligible were interviewed, for an overall retention rate of 65.6 percent. Retention rates for each survey are shown in Table 1. This table also shows which interviews were conducted with paper-and-pencil interviewing (PAPI) and which were executed with computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI).

The number of respondents can also be expressed as a percentage of the number of base year respondents not known to be deceased. This is referred to as the response rate and is reported in Table 2 for each survey round. As of 2020, 1,185 main respondents had been reported as deceased. The response rate for those believed to be alive is 74.4 percent.

Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Table 1. Sample sizes and retention rates by sample type: NLSY79
Survey Year Type and Mode of Interview

Cross-Sectional Sample

Supplemental Sample

Military Sample

Total Sample

Total Retention Rate
Note 1.1
Total Retention Rate Total Retention Rate Total Retention Rate
1979 Personal/PAPI 6111   5295   1280   12686  
1980 Personal/PAPI 5873 96.1 5075 95.9 1193 93.2 12141 95.7
1981 Personal/PAPI 5892 96.4 5108 96.5 1195 93.4 12195 96.1
1982 Personal/PAPI 5876 96.2 5036 95.1 1211 94.6 12123 95.6
1983 Personal/PAPI 5902 96.6 5093 96.2 1226 95.8 12221 96.3
1984 Personal/PAPI 5814 95.1 5040 95.2 1215 94.9 12069 95.1
1985 Personal/PAPI 5751 94.1 4957 93.6 186
Note 1.2
92.5 10894
Note 1.3
93.9
1986 Personal/PAPI 5633 92.2 4839 91.4 183 91.1 10655 91.8
1987 Telephone only/PAPI 5538 90.6 4768 90.1 179 89.1 10485 90.3
1988 Personal/PAPI 5513 90.2 4777 90.2 175 87.1 10465 90.2
1989 Personal/PAPI/CAPI 5571 91.2 4853 91.7 181 90.0 10605 91.4
1990 Personal/PAPI/CAPI 5498 90.0 4755 89.8 183 91.0 10436 89.9
1991 Personal/PAPI 5556 90.9 3281
Note 1.4
89.9 181 90.0 9018
Note 1.6
90.5
1992 Personal/PAPI 5553 90.9 3280 89.8 183 91.0 9016 90.5
1993 Personal/CAPI 5537 90.6 3293 90.2 181 90.0 9011 90.4
1994 Personal/CAPI 5457 89.3 3256 89.2 178 88.6 8891 89.2
1996 Personal/CAPI 5290 86.6 3171 86.8 175 87.1 8636 86.7
1998 Personal/CAPI 5159 84.4 3065 83.9 175 87.1 8399 84.3
2000 Personal/CAPI 4949 81.0 2921 80.0 163 81.1 8033 80.6
2002 Personal/CAPI 4775 78.1 2792 76.5 157 78.1 7724 77.5
2004 Personal/CAPI 4686 76.7 2818 77.2 157 78.1 7661 76.9
2006 Personal/CAPI 4629 75.7 2862 78.4 162 80.6 7653 76.8
2008 Personal/CAPI 4688 76.7 2908 79.6 161 80.1 7757 77.8
2010 Personal/CAPI 4602 75.3 2808 76.9 155 77.1 7565 75.9
2012 Personal/CAPI 4422 72.4 2731 74.8 147 73.1 7300 73.3
2014 Personal/CAPI 4263 69.8 2660 72.8 147 73.1 7070 71.0
2016 Personal/CAPI 4192 68.6 2581 70.7 139 69.2 6912 69.4
2018 Personal/CAPI 4147 67.9 2587 70.8 144 71.6 6878 69.0
2020 Personal/CAPI 3942 64.5 2458 67.3 135 67.2 6535 65.6
2022 Personal/CAPI 3892 63.69 2390 65.44 131 65.17 6413 64.36

Note: "Personal" mode can refer to either in person and by telephone.

Note 1.1: Retention rate is defined as the percentage of base year respondents within each sample type remaining eligible who were interviewed in a given survey year. Included in the eligible sample are deceased and difficult to field respondents whom NORC does not attempt to contact.

Note 1.2: A total of 201 military respondents were retained from the original sample of 1,280.

Note 1.3: The total number of civilian and military respondents in the NLSY79 at the beginning of the 1985 survey was 11,607.

Note 1.4: Economically disadvantaged, nonblack/non-Hispanic female and male members of the supplemental subsample are not eligible for interview as of the 1991 survey year. Remaining eligible for interview in post-1990 surveys are 3,652 black and Hispanic or Latino respondents of the supplemental sample, of whom 3,281 were interviewed in 1991.

Note 1.5: The total number of civilian and military respondents in the NLSY79 at the beginning of the 1991 survey was 9,964.

Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Table 2. Response rates (excluding deceased sample members) by sample type: NLSY79
Survey Year Cross-Sectional Sample Supplemental Sample Military Sample Total Sample
Number of Response Total Deceased Rate Number of Response Total Deceased Rate Number of Response Total Deceased Rate Number of Response Total Deceased Rate
1979 6,111 0   5,295 0   1,280 0   12,686 0  
1980 5,873 4 96.2 5,075 5 95.9 1,193 0 93.2 12,141 9 95.8
1981 5,892 15 96.7 5,108 14 96.7 1,195 0 93.4 12,195 29 96.3
1982 5,876 24 96.5 5,036 19 95.5 1,211 1 94.7 12,123 44 95.9
1983 5,902 27 97.0 5,093 26 96.7 1,226 4 96.1 12,221 57 96.8
1984 5,814 30 95.6 5,040 33 95.8 1,215 4 95.2 12,069 67 95.6
1985 5,751 36 94.7 4,957 43 94.4 186
Note 2.1
0 92.5 10,894
Note 2.1
79 94.5
1986 5,633 43 92.8 4,839 51 92.3 183 1 91.5 10,655 95 92.6
1987 5,538 51 91.4 4,768 56 91.0 179 3 90.4 10,485 110 91.2
1988 5,513 56 91.0 4,777 68 91.4 175 3 88.4 10,465 127 91.2
1989 5,571 60 92.1 4,853 78 93.0 181 3 91.4 10,605 141 92.5
1990 5,498 67 91.0 4,755 82 91.2 183 3 92.4 10,436 152 91.1
1991 5,556 75 92.0 3,281
Note 2.2
65 91.5 181 4 91.9 9,018
Note 2.2
144 91.9
1992 5,553 81 92.1 3,280 71 91.6 182 4 92.4 9,015 156 91.9
1993 5,537 90 92.0 3,293 83 92.3 181 4 91.9 9,011 177 92.1
1994 5,457 104 90.8 3,256 96 91.6 178 4 90.4 8,891 204 91.1
1996 5,290 129 88.4 3,171 109 89.5 175 5 89.3 8,636 243 88.8
1998 5,159 152 86.6 3,065 118 86.7 175 5 89.3 8,399 275 86.7
2000 4,949 170 83.3 2,921 136 83.1 163 7 84.0 8,033 313 83.2
2002 4,775 188 80.6 2,792 151 79.7 157 7 80.9 7,724 346 80.3
2004 4,686 221 79.6 2,818 171 81.0 157 7 80.9 7,661 399 80.1
2006 4,629 252 79.0 2862 197 82.8 162 7 83.5 7653 456 80.5
2008 4688 274 80.3 2908 222 84.8 161 7 83.0 7757 503 82.0
2010 4602 309 79.3 2808 255 82.7 155 9 80.7 7565 573 80.6
2012 4422 384 77.2 2731 292 81.3 147 13 78.2 7300 689 78.7
2014 4263 444 75.2 2660 331 80.1 147 15 79.0 7070 790 77.1
2016 4192 512 74.9 2581 385 79.0 139 18 76.0 6912 915 76.4
2018 4147 576 74.9 2587 435 80.4 144 22 80.4 6878 1033 77.0
2020 3942 659 72.3 2458 502 78.0 135 24 76.3 6535 1185 74.4
2022 3892 756 72.7 2390 562 77.3 131 34 65.2 6413 1348 74.4

Note: Response rate is defined as the percentage of base-year respondents remaining eligible and not known to be deceased who were interviewed in a given survey year.

Note 2.1: A total of 201 military respondents were retained from the original sample of 1,280; 186 of the 201 participated in the 1985 interview. The total number of NLSY79 civilian and military respondents eligible for interview (including deceased respondents) beginning in 1985 was 11,607.

Note 2.2: The 1,643 economically disadvantaged nonblack/non-Hispanic male and female members of the supplemental subsample were not eligible for interview as of the 1991 survey year. The total number of NLSY79 civilian and military respondents eligible for interview (including deceased respondents) beginning in 1991 was 9,964.

Reasons for noninterview

A 'Reason for Noninterview' variable is constructed for each survey year (excluding 1979) in the NLSY79 and provides an explanation of why an interview could not be conducted or completed with a respondent. The cause of noninterview is assigned by the NORC interviewer to each respondent designated as a member of the eligible sample for a given survey year. Typical coding categories have included reasons such as an interview being refused by the respondent or by the respondent's parent, the respondent or family unit not being located, or the respondent being reported as deceased.

Beginning in the 1980s, two administrative categories were added. One reflected a decision by NORC not to attempt to interview certain sample members who were determined to be extremely difficult to interview. The second category indicates that, due to funding cutbacks, interviews would not be attempted with certain members of one or more of the NLSY79 subsamples. Thus, beginning in 1985, interviews ceased for 1,079 respondent members of the military subsample; each was permanently assigned a reason for noninterview of "military sample dropped." A second group of respondents, those belonging to the supplemental economically disadvantaged, nonblack/non-Hispanic sample, was similarly dropped from interviewing beginning with the 1991 survey. The target universe for each survey year--that is, the respondents whom NORC attempts to interview--thus includes all respondents interviewed in the initial survey year exclusive of those who were:

  1. reported deceased at an earlier interview
  2. dropped from the sample
  3. judged to be extremely difficult to interview

Important information: Noninterview

Reasons for noninterview may change for a given respondent between noninterview years, even if those years are contiguous. Some codes, such as "parent refusal/break off," have become virtually obsolete over time with the aging of the cohort. Other codes should be considered relatively permanent, such as those applied to the reported death of a respondent. (Users should be aware that false reports of death have been used to avoid being interviewed. NORC attempts to verify these reports by obtaining death certificate information or newspaper obituaries.)

The coding of deceased members of the two subsamples dropped from interviewing in 1985 and 1991 has not been handled consistently. Those respondents of the military sample reported deceased during the 1980-84 surveys, that is, those with a code of "65 - Deceased" on a 'Reason for Noninterview' variable, have been recoded, beginning in 1985, to "68 - Military Sample Dropped"; this recode occurred for four cases. Thus, the count of 1,079 reflects all members of the military subsample, both living and deceased, who were dropped from interviewing; however, this means that the cumulative count of total deceased respondents on any post-1984 'Reason for Noninterview' will be understated.

The 22 members of the supplemental economically disadvantaged, nonblack/non-Hispanic sample who had died prior to the dropping of the sample in 1991 were not similarly reclassified as dropped. The count of 1,621 for the economically disadvantaged, nonblack/non-Hispanic sample in the 1991 'Reason for Noninterview' variable reflects only the living members of the total 1,643 who were dropped; the 22 deceased members of the supplemental economically disadvantaged, nonblack/non-Hispanic subsample remain coded as deceased.

Table 3 presents the number of respondents not interviewed across survey years by sample type.

Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Table 3. Reasons for noninterview by sample type: 1980-2022
Survey Year Total Not Interviewed Refusal Can't Locate Deceased Other Difficult Cases Dropped
Note 3.1
Cross-sectional Supplemental Military Cross-sectional Supplemental Military Cross-sectional Supplemental Military Cross-sectional Supplemental Military Cross-sectional Supplemental Military Cross-sectional Supplemental Military Cross-sectional Supplemental Military
1980 238 220 87 153 91 9 60 101 56 4 5 0 21 23 22 0 0 0 0 0 0
1981 219 187 85 133 71 16 30 64 20 15 14 0 41 38 49 0 0 0 0 0 0
1982 235 259 69 86 73 18 56 123 30 24 19 1 7 25 18 62 19 2 0 0 0
1983 209 202 54 103 94 23 43 63 18 27 26 4 15 14 8 21 5 1 0 0 0
1984 297 255 65 204 138 32 54 73 24 30 33 4 9 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
1985 360 338 1094 180 146 5 51 94 7 36 43 0 10 14 2 83 41 1 0 0 1079
1986 478 456 1097 284 230 10 78 115 7 43 51 1 14 22 0 59 38 0 0 0 1079
1987 573 527 1101 286 217 5 118 165 10 51 56 3 28 39 1 90 50 3 0 0 1079
1988 598 518 1105 335 248 4 107 128 13 56 68 3 43 36 4 57 38 2 0 0 1079
1989 540 442 1099 316 202 7 90 93 5 60 78 3 19 25 2 55 44 3 0 0 1079
1990 613 540 1097 385 269 8 101 139 6 67 82 3 23 28 1 37 22 0 0 0 1079
1991 555 1992 1099 316 182 9 97 99 6 75 65 4 8 13 1 59 12 0 0 1621 1079
1992 558 1993 1097 323 196 7 82 70 6 81 71 4 11 16 1 61 19 0 0 1621 1079
1993 574 1980 1099 338 191 11 57 62 3 90 83 4 12 10 1 77 13 1 0 1621 1079
1994 654 2017 1102 398 196 9 78 59 9 104 96 4 11 14 0 63 31 1 0 1621 1079
1996 820 2102 1105 486 216 6 86 87 11 128 109 5 22 23 1 98 46 3 0 1621 1079
1998 952 2208 1105 490 233 8 117 146 9 152 118 5 74 59 1 119 31 3 0 1621 1079
2000 1162 2352 1117 689 333 15 162 180 11 170 136 7 58 61 4 83 21 1 0 1621 1079
2002 1336 2503 1123 684 394 14 201 195 14 188 151 7 65 66 4 198 54 51 0 1621 1079
2004 1425 2477 1123 790 328 16 240 197 15 221 171 7 119 80 3 55 58 3 0 1621 1079
2006 1482 2433 1118 969 403 20 165 138 10 252 197 7 38 19 0 58 33 2 0 1643 1079
2008 1423 2387 1119 814 311 14 177 149 10 274 222 7 103 31 7 55 31 2 0 1643 1079
2010 1509 2487 1125 795 334 22 194 162 14 309 255 9 98 42 1 113 51 0 0 1643 1079
2012 1689 2564 1133 649 238 16 255 198 13 384 292 13 317 152 12 84 41 0 0 1643 1079
2014 1848 2635 1133 775 328 18 346 213 16 444 331 15 111 54 3 172 66 2 0 1643 1079
2016 1919 2714 1141 722 318 20 482 295 23 512 385 18 31 19 0 172 54 1 0 1643 1079
2018 1964 2708 1136 633 281 19 496 271 13 576 435 22 22 9 0 237 69 3 0 1643 1079
2020 2169 2837 1145 1010 487 29 185 94 9 659 502 24 80 49 3 235 62 1 0 1643 1079
2022 2219 2905 1149 1075 505 25 180 123 11 756 584 34 34 25 4 174 47 0 0 1643 1079

Note 1.1: Two groups of NLSY79 respondents have been dropped from interviewing: (1) 1,079 members of the 1,280 military subsample were dropped after the 1984 survey and (2) the 1,643 members of the supplemental economically disadvantaged, non-black/non-Hispanic subsample were dropped after the 1990 interview.

Sample representativeness and attrition

This section reviews the number of respondents by race, sex, and NLSY79 sample type who have continued to be interviewed during all surveys. It also takes a brief look at the racial composition of the cohort at the initial and latest survey points. Table 4 shows the number of respondents, excluding dropped respondents, who were interviewed at all survey points. This table exhibits the high degree of NLSY79 retention. From 1979 to 2020 the survey has been administered 29 times.

Table 4. Percentage of respondents (excluding dropped respondents) who answered every survey: 1979-2022
Survey Year Percent Number
1979 100 9964
1980 96.0 9571
1981 94.3 9395
1982 92.7 9234
1983 91.6 9125
1984 89.7 8942
1985 87.5 8721
1986 85.0 8472
1987 82.3 8203
1988 79.9 7957
1989 78.5 7819
1990 76.7 7642
1991 75.5 7521
1992 74.2 7396
1993 73.2 7291
1994 71.8 7153
1996 69.6 6935
1998 69.9 6664
2000 63.3 6310
2002 60.3 6004
2004 57.6 5736
2006 55.6 5538
2008 54.3 5407
2010 52.3 5208
2012 50.3 5012
2014 48.0 4787
2016 46.3 4613
2018 44.7 4452
2020 42.5 4239
2022 40.3 4020

Table 5 shows the distribution of the number of interviews completed by respondents, broken down by sample type. The "# who completed" column shows how many respondents completed exactly that number of surveys. These numbers refer to any surveys completed since the NLSY79 began, not necessarily consecutive surveys completed or surveys completed in particular years. The cumulative percent column shows a cumulative total percent of those completing at least a given number of surveys rather than a percentage of those completing an exact number of surveys. Readers should note the attrition suggested in Table 3 greatly overstates the amount of lost information. The NLSY79 asks detailed questions about work history, education, training, marital status, and fertility since the date of the respondent's last interview. These retrospective questions capture information lost due to missed interviews. Hence, a perfect response record is not needed for researchers to understand how the respondent's life changes over time, unless he or she leaves the survey forever.

Scroll right to view additional table columns.

Table 5. Number of interviews respondents completed out of 30 surveys by sample type: 1979-2022

Number of Surveys
Note 5.1

Total Sample

Cross Sectional Sample

Supplemental Sample

Military Sample

Number who Completed Cumulative Percent Number who Completed Cumulative Percent Number who Completed Cumulative Percent Number who Completed Cumulative Percent
1 39 0.4 25 0.4 14 0.4 0  
2 38 0.4 22 0.4 15 0.4 1 0. 5
3 29 0.3 19 0.3 10 0.3 0  
4 37 0.4 16 0.3 19 0.5 2 1.0
5 49 0.5 36 0.6 12 0.3 1 0.5
6 57 0.6 34 0.6 23 0.6 0  
7 71 0.7 50 0.8 19 0.5 2 1.0
8 64 0.6 42 0.7 21 0.6 1 0.5
9 77 0.8 49 0.8 28 0.8 0  
10 67 0.7 43 0.7 24 0.7 0  
11 74 0.7 39 0.6 34 1.0 1 0.5
12 76 0.8 52 0.9 22 0.6 2 1.0
13 96 1.1 62 1.0 34 0.9 0  
14 98 1.1 66 1.1 31 0.8 1 0.5
15 113 1.1 70 1.1 41 1.1 2 1.0
16 155 1.6 98 1.6 52 1.4 5 2.5
17 158 1.6 113 1.8 42 1.2 3 1.5
18 193 1.9 127 2.1 60 1.6 6 3.0
19 211 2.1 132 2.2 74 2.0 5 2.5
20 204 2.0 132 2.2 69 1.9 3 1.5
21 234 2.3 141 2.3 86 2.4 7 3.5
22 229 2.3 132 2.2 91 2.5 6 3.0
23 282 2.8 164 2.7 107 2.9 11 5.5
24 315 3.2 185 3.0 122 3.3 8 4.0
25 355 3.6 213 3.5 138 3.8 4 2.0
26 406 4.1 234 3.8 163 4.5 9 4.5
27 490 4.9 275 4.5 198 5.4 17 8.5
28 646 6.5 344 5.6 288 7.9 14 7.0
29 1081 10.8 599 9.8 457 12.5 25 12.4
30 4020 40.3 2597 42.5 1358 37.2 65 32.3
Total 9964 100 6111 100 3652 100 201 100

Note: Universe excludes the 1,079 members of the military subsample and the 1,643 members of the economically disadvantaged, non-black/non-Hispanic oversample dropped from interviewing; it includes the remaining 9,964 eligible members.

Note 5.1: Surveys completed in any year, not necessarily consecutive survey years.

Confidentiality & Informed Consent

The NLS program has established set procedures for ensuring respondent confidentiality and obtaining informed consent. These procedures comply with Federal law and the policies and guidelines of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:

OMB procedures and federal laws

OMB procedures

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is responsible for setting overall statistical policy among Federal agencies. For example, OMB has established standards on collecting information about race and ethnicity, industry, occupation, and geographic location. OMB also has established standards on the manner and timing of data releases for such principal economic indicators as the gross domestic product, the national unemployment rate, and the Consumer Price Index. In addition, OMB sets standards on whether and how much respondents to Federal surveys can be paid for their participation, an issue of particular concern in the NLS program.

Another of OMB's responsibilities is to review the procedures and questionnaires that Federal agencies use in collecting information from 10 or more respondents. Federal data collections reviewed by OMB include administrative data, such as the tax forms that the Internal Revenue Service requires individuals and corporations to complete. OMB also reviews all censuses and surveys that Federal agencies conduct, either directly or through contracts.

Surveys that are funded through Federal grants to universities and other organizations generally do not have to undergo this OMB review process unless the grantee in turn contracts with a Federal statistical agency such as the Census Bureau to collect the data. In place of OMB review, surveys funded through grants typically must undergo a competitive peer-review process established by the agency administering the grant, and that review process examines the procedures for maintaining respondent confidentiality and obtaining the informed consent of the participants. In addition, such surveys also typically are scrutinized by an institutional review board established at the grantee's institution.

OMB examines a variety of issues during these reviews, such as the:

  • amount of time (and money, if any) that the agency collecting the information estimates respondents will spend to provide the requested information
  • agency's efforts to reduce the burden on respondents of providing the information
  • purpose and necessity of the data collection, including whether it duplicates the objectives of other Federal data collections
  • ways in which the agency obtains informed consent from potential respondents to participate in the data collection
  • policies and procedures that the agency has established to ensure respondent confidentiality
  • statistical methods used to select representative samples, maximize response rates, and account for nonresponse
  • payment of money or the giving of gifts to respondents
  • questionnaire itself, including the quality of its design and whether it includes questions that respondents may regard as sensitive

These OMB reviews are very thorough. From the time an agency prepares an OMB information collection request until the time OMB approves the data collection, the process typically takes 7 months or more and includes multiple layers of review within the agency and at OMB. These reviews are helpful in improving survey quality and ensuring that agencies treat respondents properly, both in terms of providing them with information about the data collection and its uses and protecting respondent confidentiality.

The review process also provides the general public with two opportunities to submit written comments about the proposed data collection. The agency conducting the data collection publishes a notice in the Federal Register describing the data collection and inviting the public to request copies of the information collection request, questionnaires, and other materials that the agency eventually will submit to OMB. The public is invited to submit written comments to the agency sponsoring the data collection within 60 days from the time the Federal Register notice is published. In the history of the NLS program, the public very rarely has submitted comments to BLS, but when comments are received, they are summarized in the information collection request that ultimately is submitted to OMB.

After the request has been submitted to OMB, the agency sponsoring the data collection then publishes a second notice in the Federal Register and invites the public to submit comments directly to OMB within 30 days. Again, in the history of the NLS program, the public very rarely, if ever, has submitted comments to OMB. Once OMB has received the information collection request, they have 60 days to review the package, ask follow-up questions, suggest changes (or, occasionally, insist upon changes) to the survey questionnaire or procedures, and ultimately grant approval.

Respondents' advance letter

After OMB grants approval, the sponsoring agency can begin contacting potential respondents and collecting information from them. The process of contacting potential NLS respondents begins with sending them an advance letter several weeks before interviews are scheduled to begin. The advance letter serves several purposes. The obvious purpose is to inform respondents that an interviewer will be contacting them soon, but BLS and the organizations that conduct the surveys for BLS also use the letter to thank respondents for their previous participation and to encourage them to participate in the upcoming round. Another important objective of the advance letter is to remind respondents that their participation is voluntary and to tell them how much time the interview is expected to take. The letter also explains to respondents how the data will be used and how respondents' confidentiality will be protected by BLS and the organizations that conduct the surveys for BLS. An example of an advance letter, along with the confidentiality statement that appears on the back of the letter, is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. NLSY79 round 30 advance letter

Dear [Respondent Name],
For more than 40 years, the NLSY79 has provided vital information about the lives of ordinary Americans. Few surveys can match the NLSY79 in helping us understand who we are as a nation. And for that, we thank you.

Your continued participation in this study has impacted how our country understands important economic, educational, and labor market issues. And as you near retirement age and potentially leave the paid labor force, the NLSY79 will permit researchers to study key questions about retirement and the causes and consequences of age-related health issues.

We follow the federal laws that govern the confidentiality of survey respondents, as well as additional policies and procedures that ensure your answers are safeguarded. Please see the back of this letter for more information about privacy and confidentiality.

The average interview lasts about 69 minutes and you can schedule your appointment online as well as get extra cash with our Early Bird program! (See enclosed card for details.) To receive your gift faster, we offer electronic payment options through online or mobile banking and PayPal.

We appreciate your time and willingness to thoughtfully answer our questions. Few people have the opportunity to make such a lasting contribution. Thank You!

Sincerely,

Keenan Dworak-Fisher
Director, National Longitudinal Surveys
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics


WHY IS THIS STUDY IMPORTANT? Thanks to your help, policymakers and researchers will have a better understanding of the work experiences, family characteristics, health, financial status, and other important information about the lives of people in your generation. This is a voluntary study, and there are no penalties for not participating or not answering all the questions. However, missing responses make it more difficult to understand the issues that concern people in your community and across the country. Your answers represent the experiences of hundreds of other people your age. We hope we can count on your participation again this time.

WHO AUTHORIZES THIS STUDY? The sponsor of the study is the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The study is authorized under Title 29, Section 2, of the United States Code. The CHRR at The Ohio State University and NORC at the University of Chicago conduct this study under a contract with the Department of Labor. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the questionnaire and has assigned 1220-0109 as the study’s control number. This control number expires on ##/##, 20##. Without OMB approval and this number, we would not be able to conduct this study.

HOW MUCH TIME WILL THE INTERVIEW TAKE? Based on preliminary tests, we expect the average interview to take about 69 minutes. Your interview may be somewhat shorter or longer depending on your circumstances. If you have any comments regarding this study or recommendations for reducing its length, send them to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Longitudinal Surveys, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Washington, DC 20212.

WHO SEES MY ANSWERS? We want to reassure you that your confidentiality is protected by law. In accordance with the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act, the Privacy Act, and other applicable Federal laws, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, its employees and agents, will, to the full extent permitted by law, use the information you provide for statistical purposes only, will hold your responses in confidence, and will not disclose them in identifiable form without your informed consent. All the employees who work on the survey at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and its contractors must sign a document agreeing to protect the confidentiality of your data. In fact, only a few people have access to information about your identity because they need that information to carry out their job duties.

Some of your answers will be made available to researchers at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other government agencies, universities, and private research organizations through publicly available data files. These publicly available files contain no personal identifiers, such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and places of work, and exclude any information about the states, counties, metropolitan areas, and other, more detailed geographic locations in which survey participants live, making it much more difficult to figure out the identities of participants. Some researchers are granted special access to data files that include geographic information, but only after those researchers go through a thorough application process at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Those authorized researchers must sign a written agreement making them official agents of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and requiring them to protect the confidentiality of survey participants. Those researchers are never provided with the personal identities of participants. The National Archives and Records Administration and the General Services Administration may receive copies of survey data and materials because those agencies are responsible for storing the Nation’s historical documents.

WHERE CAN I FIND MORE INFORMATION? To learn more about the survey, visit www.bls.gov/nls. To search for articles, reports, and other research based on the National Longitudinal Surveys, visit www.nlsbibliography.org.

Institutional review boards

In addition to OMB review, the NLSY79 is reviewed and approved by an institutional review board (IRB) at the institutions that manage and conduct the surveys under contract with BLS. Those institutions are The Ohio State University and NORC at the University of Chicago. BLS and OMB do not require these reviews; rather, the reviews are required under the policies of the universities. Obtaining approval from the IRBs involves completing a form signed by the Principal Investigator, providing a summary of the research project and submitting a description of the consent procedures and forms used in the survey.  Additional documentation includes a copy of any materials used to recruit respondents, a detailed summary of the survey questionnaire, and any other information regarding the risks to humans of participating in the survey. OMB must review all data collections for the NLSY79.

The NLSY79 project staff at The Ohio State University Center for Human Resource Research (CHRR) and at NORC obtain approval from their respective IRBs prior to the start of each round of data collection. Because each survey includes only an interview and no invasive medical procedures, the IRBs typically focus on respondent compensation, consent procedures, and confidentiality protections for special populations, such as incarcerated or disabled respondents. Prisons, schools, and other institutions in which NLSY79 sample members may reside often request the IRB approval statement and application as evidence that appropriate procedures are being followed and to judge whether to permit NLSY79 interviewers to have access to individuals for whom the institutions are responsible.

Federal laws

Two Federal laws govern policies and procedures for protecting respondent confidentiality and obtaining informed consent in the NLSY79 program: the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act (CIPSEA) of 2002.

The Privacy Act and CIPSEA

These two acts protect the confidentiality of participants in the NLSY79 and its associated Child and Young Adult surveys. CIPSEA protects the confidentiality of participants by ensuring that individuals who provide information to BLS under a pledge of confidentiality for statistical purposes will not have that information disclosed in identifiable form to anyone not authorized to have it.

In addition, CIPSEA ensures that the information respondents provide will be used only for statistical purposes. While it always has been the BLS policy to protect respondent data from disclosure through the Privacy Act and by claiming exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act, CIPSEA is important because it specifically protects data collected from respondents for statistical purposes under a pledge of confidentiality.

This law strengthens the ability of BLS to assure respondents that, when they supply information to BLS, their information will be protected. In addition, CIPSEA includes fines and penalties for any knowing and willful disclosure of specific information to unauthorized persons by any officer, employee, or agent of BLS. Since the enactment of the Trade Secrets Act and the Privacy Act, BLS officers, employees, and agents have been subject to criminal penalties for the mishandling of confidential data, and the fines and penalties under CIPSEA are consistent with those prior laws. CIPSEA now makes such fines and penalties uniform across all Federal agencies that collect data for exclusively statistical purposes under a pledge of confidentiality.

Survey interviewers are trained how to answer questions from respondents about how their privacy will be protected. Interviewers explain to potential respondents that all the employees who work on the surveys at BLS, NORC, and CHRR are required to sign a document stating that they will not disclose the identities of survey respondents to anyone who does not work on the NLS program and is therefore not legally authorized to have such information. In fact, no one at BLS has access to information about respondents' identities, and only a few staff members at NORC and CHRR who need such information to carry out their job duties have access to information about respondents' identities.

Interviewers also explain that the answers respondents provide will be made available to researchers at BLS and other government agencies, universities, and private research organizations, but only after all personal identifiers--such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and places of work--have been removed. In addition, the publicly available data files exclude any information about the States, counties, metropolitan statistical areas, and other, more detailed geographic locations in which respondents live, making it much more difficult to infer the identities of respondents.

Respondents are told that some researchers are granted special access to data files that include geographic information, but only after those researchers undergo a thorough application process at BLS and sign a written agreement making them official agents of BLS and requiring them to protect the confidentiality of respondents. In no case are researchers provided with information on the personal identities of respondents.

Finally, the reference in the questions and answers to the National Archives and Records Administration and the General Services Administration may be confusing to some potential respondents, because those Federal agencies are not involved in the administration of the surveys. Interviewers explain to respondents that NLS data and materials will be made available to those agencies because they are responsible for storing the Nation's historical documents. The information provided to those agencies does not include respondents' personal identities, however.

The organizations involved in the NLS program continuously monitor their security procedures and improve them when necessary. Protecting the privacy of NLS respondents entails considerable responsibilities for BLS, the organizations that conduct the surveys for BLS, and the researchers who use the data. Indeed, researchers in particular may become frustrated that they cannot obtain access to all the data that they want or that they must undergo a long review process at BLS to obtain some types of data. It is important to remember, however, that protecting respondent confidentiality must remain paramount. Any action that might jeopardize respondent confidentiality and erode the confidence of respondents could harm response rates in the NLS program and in other government or academic surveys. Thus, without the safeguards in place to protect respondent confidentiality, researchers would have far less data available to work with than they currently enjoy.

Contractors' role in maintaining respondent confidentiality

BLS, NORC, and CHRR are responsible for following the Federal requirements and maintaining their own security procedures. As mentioned earlier, all officers, employees, and agents of BLS are required to sign agreements stating that they will not disclose the identities of survey respondents to anyone who does not work on the NLS program and is therefore not legally authorized to have such information. Each contractor has in place procedures to ensure that the data are secure at each point in the survey process. (See the Data Handling section for more information.)

Survey procedures

Like all contractor staff, field interviewers are agents of BLS and are required to sign the BLS agent agreement before working on the NLSY79. All interviewers also must undergo a background check when they are hired. Confidentiality is stressed during training and enforced at all times. Field interviewers receive specific instructions in their reference manuals to remind them of the appropriate procedures when locating or interacting with respondents or contacts.

At the end of each interview, interviewers ask respondents to provide information on family members, friends, or neighbors who can be contacted if the interviewers are unable to locate the sample member in a subsequent round of interviews. The interviewers then use those contacts to help in locating sample members who have moved. When contacting a sample member's relatives, friends, or neighbors about the sample member's whereabouts, interviewers never disclose the name of the survey they are conducting. They are instructed to maintain the confidentiality of any relative, friend, or neighbor who provides information about the sample member's whereabouts.

Answering machines can pose problems when interviewers are contacting sample members because it is difficult to confirm that the interviewer is calling a sample member's correct telephone number or that other household members will not hear the message. For those reasons, interviewers are instructed not to leave messages on answering machines.

When interviewers contact the appropriate household, they ask to speak with the sample member. Interviewers introduce themselves and state the purpose of the call by saying that they are from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago and are calling concerning a national survey. The name of the survey is not disclosed to anyone but the sample member.

Special situations

The NLSY79 is a general population survey and includes a variety of sample members with special circumstances, such as incarcerated individuals, respondents in the military, other institutionalized persons, disabled persons, those with limited English proficiency, and so forth.

Incarcerated respondents

Incarcerated respondents constitute the largest group requiring special accommodations. The first challenge with incarcerated respondents is contacting them to schedule an interview. NLS interviewers must contact the prison administration to arrange for an interview, but the interviewers cannot legally reveal to the prison administration that the prisoner previously had participated in the survey without first obtaining the written, informed consent of the prisoner to reveal that information (Note: Data were incomplete for 2004 due to confidentiality concerns regarding inmates' participation in the NLSY79. A protocol was established for round 22 of the NLSY79).

The following steps are used for obtaining prisoners' consent:

  1. Prisoners are first sent a letter reminding them about their previous participation in a NORC survey, but, in case the mail is monitored by prison staff, the letter does not name the survey or BLS so as not to reveal the prisoner's participation. The letter encourages the prisoner to participate in the upcoming round of the survey. It explains that NORC staff needs to set up an interview through the prison administration but that NORC cannot tell the prison administration about the prisoner's participation without the prisoner's informed consent. he letter then asks the prisoner to request a consent form by signing and dating an enclosed form letter and mailing it to NORC in a pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. The letter reminds the prisoner that the mail at the institution may be monitored and explains that the consent form that NORC will send the prisoner will state the prisoner's name and the name of the survey. The letter emphasizes that, by returning the enclosed form letter, prison management or staff may learn that the prisoner is a participant in the survey.
  2. If the prisoner chooses to send the form letter to NORC, NORC then sends the prisoner a cover letter and a consent form that names the specific survey. The prisoner is asked to sign the consent form and mail it to NORC in a pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. Once NORC has received the signed consent form, NORC staff can contact the prison to request permission to interview the prisoner and learn about any restrictions that the prison administration may impose.
  3. If the prison administration permits an interview and a date and time have been scheduled for the interview, NORC mails another letter to the prisoner. This letter serves two purposes. First, it tells the prisoner when the interview will take place. Second, it informs the prisoner in writing that the interview very likely will be monitored by prison that it is important to tell the prisoner in writing.

Once all of these steps are complete, the prisoner finally can be interviewed, but the NLS program takes additional steps to minimize the risk that prisoners might reveal illegal or illicit behavior in the presence of prison staff during the course of the interview.

As described later in this chapter, such sensitive questions are asked in the self-administered portions of the NLSY79. During these portions of the survey, the typical protocol for a respondent who is not incarcerated involves the interviewer turning the laptop computer around to enable the respondent to read the questions to him or herself and enter the answers directly into the laptop computer without the interviewer knowing the responses. (In fact, the interviewer does not even know which questions the respondent answered). In some relatively low-security correctional facilities, such as some county jails and halfway houses, this protocol still would be possible. In higher security facilities, the prison administrators would not permit the prisoner to touch the computer, so the questions either would have to be read to the respondent or skipped altogether.

NLS program staff have identified the questions that could be considered even moderately sensitive or risky for the prisoner to answer out loud. Given this examination of these questions, the NLS program has adopted the following protocol for administering sensitive questions to prisoners:

  1. At the very beginning of the interview, the interviewer will indicate in the survey instrument whether a respondent is in a correctional facility of any kind and, if so, whether the facility permits the prisoner to touch the laptop and enter responses to the self-administered questions. For Federal prisons, the interviewer assumes that the prisoner is not permitted to touch the laptop.
  2. If the facility permits the prisoner to enter responses to the self-administered questions directly into the laptop, then the full set of questions, including all of the sensitive questions, would be administered.
  3. If the facility does not permit the prisoner to enter responses directly into the laptop, or if the interview is conducted over the telephone rather than in person, all survey questions will be asked orally by the interviewer, but the instrument is programmed to skip sensitive questions in which the prisoner might be asked about illegal or illicit behavior.

Military respondents

NLSY79 respondents who are in the military tend to be very cooperative and willing to participate in the surveys, but it sometimes can be difficult to locate and contact them, particularly if they are stationed outside the United States. It sometimes is necessary to seek the help of military or civilian staff in the Department of Defense to locate and contact military respondents, but NLS program staff first must obtain the military member's written, informed consent to reveal to Department of Defense staff that he or she previously had participated in the survey and is willing to be contacted to participate in future rounds of the survey.

Respondents with limited English proficiency

Some respondents lack fluency in English and are more comfortable using another language. It is not possible to accommodate all of the different languages other than English that respondents might speak, but the NLSY79 historically has made special arrangements for respondents and their parents who speak Spanish, the most commonly spoken language other than English among respondents. NORC staff members translate advance letters and other informational materials into Spanish to enable respondents and the parents of minor respondents to provide their informed consent based on information that is written in the language that they understand best. Survey questionnaires also have been translated into Spanish to ensure that the surveys are administered consistently, an alternative much preferable to having Spanish-speaking interviewers translate the English-language questionnaire during the interview. The first 20 rounds of the NLSY79 included a Spanish version of the questionnaire, but, because the number of respondents who speak only Spanish has continued to decline, it no longer is cost-effective to continue programming a computerized Spanish questionnaire. For that reason, Spanish questionnaires are not used starting with round 21 (2004) of the NLSY79. Advance letters and other informational materials still are available in Spanish, however.

Sensitive topics

The NLSY79 has included questions on income and assets, religion, relationships with parents and other family members, sexual experiences, abortion, drug and alcohol use, criminal activities, homelessness, runaway episodes, and other topics that are potentially sensitive for respondents to discuss. Respondents are advised at the start of the interview that they can choose not to answer any questions that they prefer not to answer. During training, interviewers undergo exercises to teach them how to allay the concerns of respondents about answering sensitive questions and encourage them to respond.  Interviewers are instructed not to coerce respondents into answering questions that they prefer not to answer, however.

All questions in the NLSY79 are read to the respondent by an interviewer. The respondent then provides an answer, and the interviewer records that answer on a laptop computer. For especially sensitive questions, some respondents might be reluctant to answer truthfully--or at all--if they have to tell an interviewer their answers, even though interviewers can face criminal and civil penalties if they disclose the respondents' identities or answers to anyone not authorized to receive that information.

Guidelines for emailing sample members

At the end of each interview, respondents are asked to provide information that will help interviewers contact them during subsequent rounds of the surveys. In addition to the information collected about relatives, friends, or neighbors, interviewers also obtain the email addresses of sample members who have them. During round 20 of the NLSY79 (conducted during 2002), the NLS contractors began using email as a means to contact a small number of sample members who were hard to reach by other means. The following guidelines were enacted to ensure confidentiality:

  1. The name of the survey is not contained in the subject line or text of the email message. Some respondents may share the use of an email address with other household members, so the survey name is omitted from the message to prevent other household members from learning the specific name of the survey.
  2. Email is sent from one main address. Field interviewers are not permitted to use their individual email accounts to contact respondents.

Respondents knowing respondents

One feature of the sample design in the NLSY79 is that there often are multiple respondents within the same original household, either siblings or, occasionally, spouses. It obviously is not possible in these cases to prevent family members from knowing that a relative is in the survey sample, but interviewers take steps to ensure that each respondent's answers remain private and are not revealed to other family members.

Consent from NLSY79 respondents

Respondents are able to review the confidentiality and consent information presented in the advance letter. The respondent gives verbal consent to participate at the beginning of the interview.

Data Handling

An important part of maintaining respondent confidentiality is the careful handling and storage of data. Steps taken by BLS, CHRR, and NORC to ensure the confidentiality of all respondents to the NLSY79 include maintaining secure networks, restricting access to geographic variables, and topcoding income and asset values.

Network security

The data that are stored and handled at each NLSY79 organization's site are done so with maximum security in place.  During data collection, transmission, and storage, password protection and encryption are used to secure the data. Standard protocols for network security are followed at each organization's site. Detailed information about these arrangements is not provided to the public to prevent anyone from circumventing these safeguards.

Restricting access to geographic information

Geographic information about NLSY79 respondents is available only to researchers who are designated agents of BLS. These researchers must agree in writing to adhere to the BLS confidentiality policy, and their projects must further the mission of BLS and the NLSY79 program to conduct sound, legitimate research in the social sciences. Applicants must provide a clear statement of their research methodology and objectives and explain how the geographic variables are necessary to meet those objectives. For more information about applying to use the restricted-use Geocode data is available on the BLS Restricted Data Access page.

Topcoding of income and asset variables

Another step taken to ensure the confidentiality of NLSY79 respondents who have unusually high income and asset values is to "topcode" those values in NLSY79 data sets. Values that exceed a certain level are recoded so that they do not exceed the specified level. In each survey round, income and asset variables that include high values are identified for topcoding. For example, the wage and salary income variable usually is topcoded, but variables indicating the amount received from public assistance programs are not. Notes in the codebooks for topcoded income and asset variables provide more information about the exact calculations used to topcode each variable. For more information see the NLSY79 Documentation section.

References

Center for Human Resource Research. "Technical Sampling Report Addendum: Standard Errors and Deft Factors for Rounds IV through XIV." Columbus, OH: CHRR, The Ohio State University, 1994.

Frankel, M.R.; Williams, H.A.; and Spencer, B.D. Technical Sampling Report, National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Force Behavior. Chicago: NORC, University of Chicago, 1983.

Baker, Paula C.; Mott, Frank L.; Keck, Canada K.; and Quinlan, Stephen V. NLSY79 Child Handbook: A Guide to the 1986-1990 NLSY79 Child Data. Columbus, OH:  CHRR, The Ohio State University, 1993.

NORC. NLSY-National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Force Behavior Interviewer's Manual-Household Screening. Chicago: NORC, University of Chicago, 1978.

Olsen, Randall J. "The Effects of Computer Assisted Interviewing on Data Quality." Columbus, OH: CHRR, The Ohio State University, 1991.

Subscribe to NLSY79