([number of revised DOLEL eligible people on the household roster] > 0)

COMMENT: are there any dolel youths in the household to ask parent questions of?

REPEAT ([loop number 1])

COMMENT: loop through parent questions for all dolel eligible youths

(([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] >= 13) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] <= 16)) OR ([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] = 21) OR
([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] = 22) OR ([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] = 0)

COMMENT: if there is no "parent", skip out

([loop number 1] = 1)

COMMENT: if this is the first time through, don't bother checking the previous loops to see if this parent has already been asked about

REPEAT ([loop number 2])

COMMENT: check previous youths to see if the responding parent is the same

([interviewer selected responding parent id([loop number 1])] = [interviewer selected responding parent id([loop number 2])])

COMMENT: is the responding parent the same as a previous youths?

UNTIL ([loop number 2], ([loop number 2] = ([loop number 1] - 1)) OR ([does this youth have the same responding parent as a previous youth([loop number 1])] = 1))

COMMENT: loop through all previous youth's parents or until a match is found

([does this youth have the same responding parent as a previous youth()] = 1)

COMMENT: is this the same parent as was asked about before?

([is responding parent available for parent interview()] = 1)

COMMENT: was that parent available?

Is [interviewer selected responding parent name()] available to do an interview at this time?

([biological father's id on household roster 2()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [biological father's id on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the mom be the replacement person?

([biological father's id on household roster 2()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [biological father's id on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the dad be the replacement person?

([adopted mother's id of person on household roster 2()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [adopted mother's id of person on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the adoptmom be the replacement person?

([adopted father's id of person on household roster 2()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [adopted father's id of person on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the adoptdad be the replacement person?

([id of step-mother on household roster 2()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [id of step-mother on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the stepmom be the replacement person?

([id of step-father on household roster 2()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [id of step-father on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the stepdad be the replacement person?

([foster mother's id on household roster()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [foster mother's id on household roster()])

COMMENT: should the foster mom be the replacement person?

([foster father's id on household roster()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [foster father's id on household roster()])

COMMENT: should the fosterdad be the replacement person?

(([identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = 17) OR ([identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = 19)) AND
(([man in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = 0) OR ([man in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] > [identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()])) AND
([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the mom figure be the replacement person?

(([man in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = 18) OR ([man in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = 20)) AND
(([identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = 0) OR ([identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] > [man in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()]) OR
([identification for woman in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()] = [interviewer selected responding parent id()])) AND
([interviewer selected responding parent id()] != [identification for man in house responsible for youth on household roster 2()])

COMMENT: should the dad figure be the replacement person?

(([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] > 0) AND ([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] <= 6) AND ([type of replacement responding parent found()] > 0) AND ([type of replacement responding parent found()] <= 6)) OR
((([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] = 9) OR ([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] = 10)) AND
(([type of replacement responding parent found()] = 9) OR ([type of replacement responding parent found()] = 10))) OR
(([interviewer selected responding parent type if computer finds no responding parent()] >= 17) AND ([type of replacement responding parent found()] >= 17))

COMMENT: is there a valid replacement person who was found during the household relationship loops?

([loop number 1] = 1)

COMMENT: if this is the first time through, don't bother checking the previous loops to see if this parent has already been asked about

REPEAT ([loop number 3])

COMMENT: check previous youths to see if the replacement parent is the same

([id of replacement responding parent found([loop number 1])] = [id of replacement responding parent found([loop number 3])])

COMMENT: is the responding parent the same as a previous youths?

UNTIL ([loop number 3], ([loop number 3] = ([loop number 1] - 1)) OR ([does this youth have the same replacement responding parent as another youth([loop number 1])] = 1))

COMMENT: loop through all previous youth's parents or until a match is found

([does this youth have the same replacement responding parent as another youth()] = 1)

COMMENT: is this the same parent as was asked about before?

([is the replacement responding parent available for parent interview()] = 1)

COMMENT: was that parent available?

Is [name of replacement responding parent found()] available to do an interview at this time?

([does this youth have the same responding parent as a previous youth()] = 1)

COMMENT: was the parent the same as that for a previous youth?

([will responding parent be available at some time during field period()] = 1)

COMMENT: if the parent was the same, was the parent going to be available at some point?

INTERVIEWER: TRY TO SET UP APPOINTMENT WITH [interviewer selected responding parent name()]
TO DO THE PARENT INTERVIEW.

WILL [interviewer selected responding parent name()] BE AVAILABLE FOR PARENT INTERVIEW
AT SOME TIME DURING INTERVIEW PERIOD?

([was a replacement responding parent found()] = 1)

COMMENT: was there a valid replacement person asked about earlier?

([does this youth have the same replacement responding parent as another youth()] = 1)

COMMENT: was the replacement parent the same as a previous youth?

([is replacement responding parent available at some time during field period()] = 1)

COMMENT: if the replacement parent was the same, was the parent going to be available at some point?

INTERVIEWER: TRY TO SET UP APPOINTMENT WITH [name of replacement responding parent found()]
TO DO THE PARENT INTERVIEW.

WILL [name of replacement responding parent found()] BE AVAILABLE FOR PARENT INTERVIEW
AT SOME TIME DURING INTERVIEW PERIOD?

UNTIL ([loop number 1], ([loop number 1] = [number of revised DOLEL eligible people on the household roster]))

COMMENT: loop through all dolel members

([number of revised DOLEL eligible people on the household roster] > 0) OR ([number of revised STPEL eligible people on the household roster] > 0) OR ([number of revised ETPEL eligible people on the household roster] > 0)

COMMENT: are there any eligible people to ask the name for?

REPEAT ([loop counter ])

COMMENT: loop through all hh members

([revised DOLEL eligibility flag of person on household roster 2()] = 1) OR ([revised ETPEL eligibility flag of person on household roster 2()] = 1) OR ([revised STPEL eligibility flag of person on household roster 2()] = 1)

COMMENT: is this person eligible?

"May I have the full name of [name of person on household roster 2()]?"

UNTIL ([loop counter ], ([loop counter ] = [number of people on household roster 2]))

COMMENT: loop through all hh members