Search Results

Author: Zolna, Mia
Resulting in 2 citations.
1. Lindberg, Laura
Kost, Kathryn
Desai, Sheila
Maddow-Zimet, Isaac
Zolna, Mia
Completeness of Abortion Reporting in Three National Surveys in the United States
Presented: Denver CO, Population Association of America Annual Meeting, April 2018
Cohort(s): NLSY97
Publisher: Population Association of America
Keyword(s): Abortion; Monte Carlo; National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (AddHealth); National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG); Underreporting

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Despite its frequency, abortion remains a highly sensitive, stigmatized and thus difficult-to-measure behavior. This paper presents estimates of abortion underreporting for three recent major national surveys in the United States--the National Survey of Family Growth 2006 -2010 and 2011-2015, the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. The numbers of abortions reported in each survey will be compared to an external "gold standard" for national abortion counts obtained from a comprehensive census of abortion providers, with adjustments for differences in age and period of each data source. We will also use Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the extent to which underreporting may bias studies of the relationship between abortion and other variables. This work will help to clarify the extent to which pervasive underreporting of abortion in our nation's surveys compromises the study of abortion and fertility more generally.
Bibliography Citation
Lindberg, Laura, Kathryn Kost, Sheila Desai, Isaac Maddow-Zimet and Mia Zolna. "Completeness of Abortion Reporting in Three National Surveys in the United States." Presented: Denver CO, Population Association of America Annual Meeting, April 2018.
2. Lindberg, Laura
Kost, Kathryn
Maddow-Zimet, Isaac
Desai, Sheila
Zolna, Mia
Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys
Demography published online (26 May 2020): DOI: 10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4.
Also: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4
Cohort(s): NLSY97
Publisher: Population Association of America
Keyword(s): Abortion; Monte Carlo; National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (AddHealth); National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG); Underreporting

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Despite its frequency, abortion remains a highly sensitive, stigmatized, and difficult-to-measure behavior. We present estimates of abortion underreporting for three of the most commonly used national fertility surveys in the United States: the National Survey of Family Growth, the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Numbers of abortions reported in each survey were compared with external abortion counts obtained from a census of all U.S. abortion providers, with adjustments for comparable respondent ages and periods of each data source. We examined the influence of survey design factors, including survey mode, sampling frame, and length of recall, on abortion underreporting. We used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate potential measurement biases in relationships between abortion and other variables. Underreporting of abortion in the United States compromises the ability to study abortion--and, consequently, almost any pregnancy-related experience--using national fertility surveys.
Bibliography Citation
Lindberg, Laura, Kathryn Kost, Isaac Maddow-Zimet, Sheila Desai and Mia Zolna. "Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys." Demography published online (26 May 2020): DOI: 10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4.